There was a time when I felt sorry for Iron Mike, Tommy Morrison and even Ike Ibeabuchi, well maybe not for him, but you get my point.
Is it really sympathy for those f*cked up people or nostalgia (what if...) that leads us to mourn for former greats who screwed it up?
Today, I don't have any sympathy whatsoever for the likes of Tyson. I don't give a damn about their childhood and the reasons they became what they are... criminals and no-goods.
Cassius Clay and George Foreman grew up in poverty and theys became good people, reasonable people.
Sure, Tyson and Ibeabuchi could have been saviours of the heavyweight division if you just consider talent.
A boxer is not a computer though. You have to consider the whole personality and in those (nut)cases it couldn't have worked out in the long run. Eventually they had to screw it up.
___________________
What "goodness" do we have today? Well, to summarize it, it has to be Wladimir Klitschko. Flawless personality, intelligent and charming personality. It's just that he is not exactly the best boxer.
Do good boxers have to be crooks?
No, Evander Holyfield is one of the all-time greats, he is a decent human being.
My point is:
Don't look back and imagine what could have been, if person X was not a lunatic.
Don't feel sympathy for criminals, don't make excuses.
A champion should not only be a good boxer, but also a good person.
How can grown-up people tolerate a boxer with a crime-record longer than the golden gate bridge?
Sympathy for wasted talent, screwed up personalities etc.?
-
seattledirk
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 82
- Joined: 23 Nov 2002, 18:22
-
pundit
- Heavyweight

-
generic screen name
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 631
- Joined: 11 Feb 2006, 16:28