Who is better Pernell Whitaker or Usyk

[victor-romeo]

I respect both of these fighters, but due to both fighters lack of punching power, that have not always been my favorite fighters. I like Boxer punchers Like Thomas Hearns and Kovalev.

Usyk actually quiet often reminds of Pernell's style.

I do think Whitaker and Usyk both great fighters , with create drive to win fights.

[jamamb]

id fertainly bet on usyk in a fight

[Enlightened-One]

This place just keeps getting worse.

[Mexi-Box]

This place just keeps getting worse.

Mainly because of your posts.

[Abradolf Lincler]

This place just keeps getting worse.

Mainly because of your posts.

Agreed. What a pretentious loser.

[candyslim]

That's a very strange question if you don't mind my saying so. Different eras, different weights, the only thing they have in common is they are/were both great technical boxers. I find it hard enough to compare same era/different weight or same weight/different era,.

As Jamamb said Usyk clearly wins but beyond that, I'm not going there.

[victor-romeo]

They also have in common is that they are light hitting, southpaws, who are very good on defense, both won gold medals, and both are world champions, the biggest commonalties are their southpaw stance, with great defense, and not much only occasional shows of punching power. Both also show a champions drive to excellence.

[sharpei_louis]

How can you differentiate then?

[punchoutsb]

This place just keeps getting worse.

You'll be leaving soon though right? You never turned over your novel about Pacs personal life troubles so surely you'll be accepting the lifetime ban as you said?

[SenorPipino]

I'm a Whitaker fan.

I'll go with Sweet Pea but not at 200 lbs.

But if Usyk wants to drop down to 147, that's a completely different fight.

[candyslim]

You're right. A fight for (Usyk's) life I shouldn't wonder. A 147 Usyk would be skeletal and look very Brelandish ... er, I mean outlandish.

[victor-romeo]

I wrote who is better not who would win in a fight...obviously Usyk fights at a much higher weight than Pernell did..

[Enlightened-One]

This place just keeps getting worse.

You'll be leaving soon though right? You never turned over your novel about Pacs personal life troubles so surely you'll be accepting the lifetime ban as you said?

What the hell are you talking about? I listed facts about Pacquiao that no one could possibly deny.

How can someone receive a ban for detailing historical events that actually took place in the real world?

[punchoutsb]

This place just keeps getting worse.

You'll be leaving soon though right? You never turned over your novel about Pacs personal life troubles so surely you'll be accepting the lifetime ban as you said?

What the hell are you talking about? I listed facts about Pacquiao that no one could possibly deny.

How can someone receive a ban for detailing historical events that actually took place in the real world?

You know exactly what I'm talking about.

I tell you what, if am a troll, a forum moderator is welcome to issue me with a permanent ban if any of my claims relating to Manny Pacquiao are factually incorrect.

I could write a "War & Peace" sized novel about his mistakes.

You've yet to produce your over 1,200 page novel on Pac.

[Enlightened-One]

You'll be leaving soon though right? You never turned over your novel about Pacs personal life troubles so surely you'll be accepting the lifetime ban as you said?

What the hell are you talking about? I listed facts about Pacquiao that no one could possibly deny.

How can someone receive a ban for detailing historical events that actually took place in the real world?

You know exactly what I'm talking about.

I tell you what, if am a troll, a forum moderator is welcome to issue me with a permanent ban if any of my claims relating to Manny Pacquiao are factually incorrect.

I could write a "War & Peace" sized novel about his mistakes.

You've yet to produce your over 1,200 page novel on Pac.

The two sentences you've quoted aren't related, so you need to either attend an adult literacy course or alternatively arrange for assistance from a professional carer or a loved one to explain the actual meaning of my words.

I spoke the truth about Pacquiao and no one can prove me wrong about anything I wrote... unless someone possesses a TARDIS and is able to rewrite the course of history.

[keithmoonhangover]

This place just keeps getting worse.

Mainly because of your posts.

Agreed. What a pretentious loser.

Pretentious loser is a bit harsh, I prefer the term stubborn wanker.

[punchoutsb]

What the hell are you talking about? I listed facts about Pacquiao that no one could possibly deny.

How can someone receive a ban for detailing historical events that actually took place in the real world?

You know exactly what I'm talking about.

I tell you what, if am a troll, a forum moderator is welcome to issue me with a permanent ban if any of my claims relating to Manny Pacquiao are factually incorrect.

I could write a "War & Peace" sized novel about his mistakes.

You've yet to produce your over 1,200 page novel on Pac.

The two sentences you've quoted aren't related, so you need to either attend an adult literacy course or alternatively arrange for assistance from a professional carer or a loved one to explain the actual meaning of my words.

I spoke the truth about Pacquiao and no one can prove me wrong about anything I wrote... unless someone possesses a TARDIS and is able to rewrite the course of history.

"Any of my claims".

Check mate.

[keithmoonhangover]

What the hell are you talking about? I listed facts about Pacquiao that no one could possibly deny.

How can someone receive a ban for detailing historical events that actually took place in the real world?

You know exactly what I'm talking about.

I tell you what, if am a troll, a forum moderator is welcome to issue me with a permanent ban if any of my claims relating to Manny Pacquiao are factually incorrect.

I could write a "War & Peace" sized novel about his mistakes.

You've yet to produce your over 1,200 page novel on Pac.

The two sentences you've quoted aren't related, so you need to either attend an adult literacy course or alternatively arrange for assistance from a professional carer or a loved one to explain the actual meaning of my words.

I spoke the truth about Pacquiao and no one can prove me wrong about anything I wrote... unless someone possesses a TARDIS and is able to rewrite the course of history.

Be honest, what do you prefer......

1. Discussing boxing.
2. Constantly trying to prove that you're right and everyone else is wrong.

[punchoutsb]

You know exactly what I'm talking about.





You've yet to produce your over 1,200 page novel on Pac.

The two sentences you've quoted aren't related, so you need to either attend an adult literacy course or alternatively arrange for assistance from a professional carer or a loved one to explain the actual meaning of my words.

I spoke the truth about Pacquiao and no one can prove me wrong about anything I wrote... unless someone possesses a TARDIS and is able to rewrite the course of history.

Be honest, what do you prefer......

1. Discussing boxing.
2. Constantly trying to prove that you're right and everyone else is wrong.

There's a reason why I called him on this

[Enlightened-One]

The two sentences you've quoted aren't related, so you need to either attend an adult literacy course or alternatively arrange for assistance from a professional carer or a loved one to explain the actual meaning of my words.

I spoke the truth about Pacquiao and no one can prove me wrong about anything I wrote... unless someone possesses a TARDIS and is able to rewrite the course of history.

Be honest, what do you prefer......

1. Discussing boxing.
2. Constantly trying to prove that you're right and everyone else is wrong.

There's a reason why I called him on this

I listed real-world facts about Manny Pacquiao.

If people want to claim I'm wrong about these facts, then all they're doing is living in denial, wherby their dreams take precedence over reality.

I want to talk about the real sport of boxing, not some sort of dreamed up JK Rowling fictional account of it.

[punchoutsb]

Be honest, what do you prefer......

1. Discussing boxing.
2. Constantly trying to prove that you're right and everyone else is wrong.

There's a reason why I called him on this

I listed real-world facts about Manny Pacquiao.

If people want to claim I'm wrong about these facts, then all they're doing is living in denial, wherby their dreams take precedence over reality.

I want to talk about the real sport of boxing, not some sort of dreamed up JK Rowling fictional account of it.

You did list real-world facts about Manny Pacquiao.

You also said you would accept a ban if any of your claims relating to Manny were incorrect. You claimed you could write a War and Peace sized novel about it. Since you love citing sources so much, I figured I'd point this out to you. So will you be accepting the lifetime ban or when can we expect the novel?

[Enlightened-One]

There's a reason why I called him on this

I listed real-world facts about Manny Pacquiao.

If people want to claim I'm wrong about these facts, then all they're doing is living in denial, wherby their dreams take precedence over reality.

I want to talk about the real sport of boxing, not some sort of dreamed up JK Rowling fictional account of it.

You did list real-world facts about Manny Pacquiao.

You also said you would accept a ban if any of your claims relating to Manny were incorrect. You claimed you could write a War and Peace sized novel about it. Since you love citing sources so much, I figured I'd point this out to you. So will you be accepting the lifetime ban or when can we expect the novel?

You need to learn how to read and comprehend words effectively, instead of intentionally mis-interpreting them so that they adhere to your preferred perception of reality.

At least you agree with the accuracy of the facts I listed about Pacquiao.

[punchoutsb]

I listed real-world facts about Manny Pacquiao.

If people want to claim I'm wrong about these facts, then all they're doing is living in denial, wherby their dreams take precedence over reality.

I want to talk about the real sport of boxing, not some sort of dreamed up JK Rowling fictional account of it.

You did list real-world facts about Manny Pacquiao.

You also said you would accept a ban if any of your claims relating to Manny were incorrect. You claimed you could write a War and Peace sized novel about it. Since you love citing sources so much, I figured I'd point this out to you. So will you be accepting the lifetime ban or when can we expect the novel?

You need to learn how to read and comprehend words effectively, instead of intentionally mis-interpreting them so that they adhere to your preferred perception of reality.

At least you agree with the accuracy of the facts I listed about Pacquiao.

So quoting your own words claiming all your others words are accurate was wrong?

You're justso easy to mess with man; you're like a partly programmed bot that begins to shut down when you're own line of logic is turned on you

ps you should look up what the word "any" means

[Enlightened-One]

You did list real-world facts about Manny Pacquiao.

You also said you would accept a ban if any of your claims relating to Manny were incorrect. You claimed you could write a War and Peace sized novel about it. Since you love citing sources so much, I figured I'd point this out to you. So will you be accepting the lifetime ban or when can we expect the novel?

You need to learn how to read and comprehend words effectively, instead of intentionally mis-interpreting them so that they adhere to your preferred perception of reality.

At least you agree with the accuracy of the facts I listed about Pacquiao.

So quoting your own words claiming all your others words are accurate was wrong?

You're justso easy to mess with man; you're like a partly programmed bot that begins to shut down when you're own line of logic is turned on you

ps you should look up what the word "any" means

This conversation has unfortunately gone around in circles, as I've already pulled you up on quoting my sentences out-of-context, but I guess that's the point of your trolling, isn't it? It's to provoke a reaction from your target.

Your behaviour is more likely to receive a permanent ban than mine, especially considering you've already admitted to trolling.

Ironic isn't it?

[punchoutsb]

You need to learn how to read and comprehend words effectively, instead of intentionally mis-interpreting them so that they adhere to your preferred perception of reality.

At least you agree with the accuracy of the facts I listed about Pacquiao.

So quoting your own words claiming all your others words are accurate was wrong?

You're justso easy to mess with man; you're like a partly programmed bot that begins to shut down when you're own line of logic is turned on you

ps you should look up what the word "any" means

This conversation has unfortunately gone around in circles, as I've already pulled you up on quoting my sentences out-of-context, but I guess that's the point of your trolling, isn't it? It's to provoke a reaction from your target.

It seems that you prefer to troll than talk about the sport of boxing that takes place in the real world.

Your behaviour is more likely to receive a permanent ban than mine, especially considering you've already admitted to trolling.

Ironic isn't it?

It hasn't gone it circles; you've just squirmed because your AI doesn't allow you to admit fault and it's quite funny. You can't handle your own shtick