How would Kovalev fare at Heavyweight?

Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: How would Kovalev fare at Heavyweight?

Post by Blodhemn »

Danny Green was never a full size CW. The phrase "DannyWeight" was coined due to him having catchweight bouts between LHW and CW to suit him. In the two fights that weren't fought at DannyWeight, he got KO'd.

If a CW is good enough, he can make a HW run. Haye/Adamek, even Huck and Cunningham showed some success. Obviously, to actually beat the champ is a different story, but hanging in the top 10 or 5 isn't a reach as Haye and Adamek stayed in the top 5 for a while. It's all about matchmaking and let's face it, the best don't fight the best often enough, so someone a weight class below who is driven to be ranked and get a title shot can do so pretty quickly. Adding another weight class in there does more harm than good. Tarver even fought at HW.. Makes no sense to add another, it'd just be another transition to HW.
birdman77
Super Middleweight
Posts: 82
Joined: 12 Mar 2013, 02:25

Re: How would Kovalev fare at Heavyweight?

Post by birdman77 »

Too small to handle Wilder or even Stiverne. Def too short for Wlad. He could beat up Chisora, Haye, Cunningham and others
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: How would Kovalev fare at Heavyweight?

Post by danamba7 »

birdman77 wrote:Too small to handle Wilder or even Stiverne. Def too short for Wlad. He could beat up Chisora, Haye, Cunningham and others
Do you really think he'd beat up a fit David Haye? Not saying Haye would be a nailed on winner but Haye is very good defensively and hits just as hard as Kovalev but seems more explosive. If Haye connected it would be lights out for Kovalev and the same vice versa. Remember Wlad didn't even really hurt Haye and Haye was terrible that night.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: How would Kovalev fare at Heavyweight?

Post by crusader »

danamba7 wrote:
birdman77 wrote:Too small to handle Wilder or even Stiverne. Def too short for Wlad. He could beat up Chisora, Haye, Cunningham and others
Do you really think he'd beat up a fit David Haye? Not saying Haye would be a nailed on winner but Haye is very good defensively and hits just as hard as Kovalev but seems more explosive. If Haye connected it would be lights out for Kovalev and the same vice versa. Remember Wlad didn't even really hurt Haye and Haye was terrible that night.
If Haye was 'terrible' it probably helped him avoid being hurt, as fighting more assertively would've probably left him more vulnerable.

Kovalev would give away too much size for me to pick against someone like Haye, and I think he would run into serious problems against the division's top fighters. He's not even that big at 175, and his power is an important factor in the success he's had.
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: How would Kovalev fare at Heavyweight?

Post by danamba7 »

crusader wrote:
danamba7 wrote:
birdman77 wrote:Too small to handle Wilder or even Stiverne. Def too short for Wlad. He could beat up Chisora, Haye, Cunningham and others
Do you really think he'd beat up a fit David Haye? Not saying Haye would be a nailed on winner but Haye is very good defensively and hits just as hard as Kovalev but seems more explosive. If Haye connected it would be lights out for Kovalev and the same vice versa. Remember Wlad didn't even really hurt Haye and Haye was terrible that night.
If Haye was 'terrible' it probably helped him avoid being hurt, as fighting more assertively would've probably left him more vulnerable.

Kovalev would give away too much size for me to pick against someone like Haye. He's not even particularly big at LHW.
True. He was very tentative in the Wlad fight.
IKSRTFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4758
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 17:14

Re: How would Kovalev fare at Heavyweight?

Post by IKSRTFO »

Bump
greg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5323
Joined: 23 Mar 2007, 07:44

Re: How would Kovalev fare at Heavyweight?

Post by greg »

..I wonder what happened to crusader..was a great poster..
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9446
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: How would Kovalev fare at Heavyweight?

Post by tiny_acres »

greg wrote: 06 Aug 2018, 16:53 ..I wonder what happened to crusader..was a great poster..
Several good posters are missing in action.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32734
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: How would Kovalev fare at Heavyweight?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

This was a terrible idea for a thread 4 years ago, and it hasn’t gotten better with age :lol:

Interesting reading how bad everyone agreed CW was at the time tho, considering how good it’s been recently.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: How would Kovalev fare at Heavyweight?

Post by SenorPipino »

I thought it was a new thread and could only chuckle at the headline.

It woudn't be farfetched for some here to suggest that Kovalev is worn out at 175 and might prosper at heavy.

Not likely after getting stopped by ordinary punchers Alvarez and Ward.

Fortunately it's just an old thread undergoing a rebirth.

No one that whacko has surfaced yet.

How come no one has asked how Kovalev might do at cruiser?
Post Reply