SN - Gary Young snub - DISGRACE

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 03 May 2006, 07:04

I would have done exactly the same as Young , if thats the correct story.

I know he may of got a decent payday, but if you can make an extra bit on top flogging the tickets, and still think you stand a good chance of a seat at ringside, then its a chance worth taking. Just didn't work this time.

I've been to alot of shows where boxers on the undercard blag seats at ringside, mostly due to the fact they know someone on the security, goes on all the time.

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 03 May 2006, 07:11

speaking of VIP passes any chance of one

don't call it a comeback · Post by **don't call it a comeback** » 03 May 2006, 08:00

boxingchat wrote:Calm down you lot, you'll all get an ulcer!

Just becuase you can't handle the facts and the truth it's no use getting so emotional.

I think the writer of the original post could handle the facts and was prepared to respond in a mature and balanced way in accepting what you had to say. Well done to him.

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 03 May 2006, 09:39

Do we really believe that if Amer Khan handed out his ringside passes to a few mates, he'd be chucked out of ringside as a result?

Assuming he hadn't just been stiffed inside a round of course.

Hot Tub Man#1 · Post by **Hot Tub Man#1** » 03 May 2006, 10:36

'Do we really believe that if Amer Khan handed out his ringside passes to a few mates, he'd be chucked out of ringside as a result? '

that's a good point. what i think i was trying to say is that once you get beat, nobody wants to know you. SN included, on this evidence.

BigEars · Post by **BigEars** » 03 May 2006, 11:10

MightyWarrior wrote:Do we really believe that if Amer Khan handed out his ringside passes to a few mates, he'd be chucked out of ringside as a result?

Assuming he hadn't just been stiffed inside a round of course.

Well Amer Kahn might but not Amir Kahn .

lirva33 · Post by **lirva33** » 03 May 2006, 15:02

don't call it a comeback wrote:
boxingchat wrote:Calm down you lot, you'll all get an ulcer!

Just becuase you can't handle the facts and the truth it's no use getting so emotional.
I think the writer of the original post could handle the facts and was prepared to respond in a mature and balanced way in accepting what you had to say. Well done to him.

honestly, what is the point of this post?

states · Post by **states** » 03 May 2006, 17:59

lirva33 wrote:
don't call it a comeback wrote:
boxingchat wrote:Calm down you lot, you'll all get an ulcer!

Just becuase you can't handle the facts and the truth it's no use getting so emotional.
I think the writer of the original post could handle the facts and was prepared to respond in a mature and balanced way in accepting what you had to say. Well done to him.
honestly, what is the point of this post?

You know full well what it was. Pay the man.

JimmyJamJerusalem · Post by **JimmyJamJerusalem** » 04 May 2006, 21:43

On a positive note: What a cracking result for McNeil!!!!