Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Ricky
Lightweight
Posts: 13922
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 09:27

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by Ricky »

Some wildly different scorecards.

I thought canelo win around.8 rounds imo.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by TheGman »

Fckin shockin,feel like not watching boxing any more. That was a joke of a score. i had it 115-112 GGG
Last edited by TheGman on 16 Sep 2018, 00:08, edited 1 time in total.
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by Fray Bentos »

What an absolute robbery, I say this as a Latin American disposed to Canelo.

Canelo did not win that fight, no way. And that two inch gash on his eyelid that never fornicating bled. :doh:
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by samwbr »

Pathetic. Absolute joke decision.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by samwbr »

Most protected champion in history
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by TheGman »

Vegas decision to keep b-hop with his record,de la hoya and his sh1t storm of a company is wrecking boxing
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by TheGman »

Cmon max say it how it is "you never won this fight"
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16925
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Well a lot of us knew this would happen :cry:
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by danconnollyeire »

Yeah canelo didn’t win that fight
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by leejonesjnr »

Nah, correct decision.
Alvarez on the front foot, superb movement and heavy body shots.
Ricky
Lightweight
Posts: 13922
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 09:27

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by Ricky »

Surely i cant be the only one that thought Canelo won that pretty handily? He held the centre of the ring which was telling.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23206
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by handsofstone »

Had Golovkin winning 115-113 but I don't think that's too bad a result, I liked the look of Alvarez tonight especially early on, he was out quick, came out firing and tried to control things, I thought his punches were sharper and more accurate, Golovkin has a serious chin so they didn't look like they had an effect but they were hard shots, Golovkin's chin was even more iron than I thought it was, Alvarez's body shots were better do and any of the eye catching punches early on came from him

I thought Golovkin struggled a bit with his timing early on, his jab matched Canelo's but it was the quality shots of Canelo that I thought were the difference, Canelo took his foot off the gas again though and I thought Golovking got better as the fight wore and I had him sweeping the last 5 to take it

Superb fight though even better than the first :bow:
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by lillywhite14 »

Good fight ruined by a poor decision

Canelo has some serious backing. Remember, they tried their best to give him something in the Mayweather fight!
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3373
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

Shameful decision

The market had ggg at 1/3 after the 12th round

Total robbery from the drug cheat and his crooked team
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by TheGman »

GGG won that fight and canelo is roided up to death,GGG only has to show ppl his right hand and they fall over and canelo"the light-middleweight" took them for 24 rounds? Fck off he is on the steds and shouldnt of even been in that ring tonight the cheat
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by Covfefe »

I had it 115-114 for GGG.

Thought Canelo was very impressive though.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32954
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by Boxerbeetle »

I only listened on the radio and have also been following online, but seems virtually everyone scored it for Golovkin. Canelo was always going to get the decision regardless .
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by Covfefe »

Boxerbeetle wrote: 16 Sep 2018, 00:17 I only listened on the radio and have also been following online, but seems virtually everyone scored it for Golovkin. Canelo was always going to get the decision regardless .
David Haye scored it for Canelo, but he gave GgG the last round and I thought that was one of the clearest Canelo rounds for a while in the fight.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by lillywhite14 »

Boxerbeetle wrote: 16 Sep 2018, 00:17 I only listened on the radio and have also been following online, but seems virtually everyone scored it for Golovkin. Canelo was always going to get the decision regardless .
So predictable. Shame because it’s took the gloss off the fight
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by TheGman »

Golden boy have got vegas in their pocket its plain and simple. If a third fight happens its shouldnt be in vegas
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by Fray Bentos »

Canelo was the aggressor and he went forward but he missed a lot and whatever excellent work GGG did was muted in comparison to anything Canelo did which had the crowd screaming, it's a fight that you can read wrongly based on the reactions of the crowd.

If you scored the fight on mute, there can be no way Canelo won that fight.
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by Fray Bentos »

thechump wrote: 16 Sep 2018, 00:21 Golden boy have got vegas in their pocket its plain and simple. If a third fight happens its shouldnt be in vegas
It would have to be in fornicating Kazakhstan though :lol: it's the only way GGG is going to get a fair shake. :shame:
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5171
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by TheLeprechaun »

RKY wrote: 16 Sep 2018, 00:12 Surely i cant be the only one that thought Canelo won that pretty handily? He held the centre of the ring which was telling.
I agree. He consistently landed hard counters to the body and seemed to walk through anything GGG had up til the point when GGG landed a huge right hand on the chin late on. I thought it was a clear Canelo win. Canelo hardly took a backward step all night and was landing counters on GGG any time GGG threw power shots. GGG landed more jabs but that's not enough for me.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by lillywhite14 »

Richie Woodhall is so flakey!

This lot sound like the sky mob when they’re discussing a Hearn fighter.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Canelo v GGG II to be shown on BT Sport PPV

Post by lillywhite14 »

Wigan_Unathletic wrote: 16 Sep 2018, 00:23
thechump wrote: 16 Sep 2018, 00:21 Golden boy have got vegas in their pocket its plain and simple. If a third fight happens its shouldnt be in vegas
It would have to be in effing Kazakhstan though :lol: it's the only way GGG is going to get a fair shake. :shame:
A fairer location and more realistic location would be New York
Post Reply