Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by BitPlayer »

I heard Strickland held it, and looks like Laight's recently surpassed him, though Strickland has more fights in total (which I think Laight wants to beat)

Though with Strickland fighting under other names, maybe not.
Lenny Cravats
Super Middleweight
Posts: 8095
Joined: 23 Feb 2013, 10:43

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by Lenny Cravats »

BitPlayer wrote: 20 Oct 2018, 16:09 I heard Strickland held it, and looks like Laight's recently surpassed him, though Strickland has more fights in total (which I think Laight wants to beat)

Though with Strickland fighting under other names, maybe not.
Thought he retired at 300 a few months back? Is he coming back? It’ll take him a few years to rack up as many as Strickland. Would he be licensed for it?
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by bripez »

Nothing against the lad who is hopefully earning a few quid, but to get to 300 fights and losing 290 of them then somebody somewhere is taking the piss out of people buying tickets - usually the friends and family of some 2-0 kid who is never going to get to area title level.
REEVE
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 776
Joined: 19 Apr 2010, 19:12

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by REEVE »

bripez wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 05:25 Nothing against the lad who is hopefully earning a few quid, but to get to 300 fights and losing 290 of them then somebody somewhere is taking the piss out of people buying tickets - usually the friends and family of some 2-0 kid who is never going to get to area title level.
That lad whos 2-0 is probably living the dream, hell be a local celebrity and kris is just there to help him learn the trade and make a few quid for himself
spudder56
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1568
Joined: 16 Jun 2011, 11:27

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by spudder56 »

Is kris making a comeback then ?
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28516
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by Coco »

REEVE wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 07:28
bripez wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 05:25 Nothing against the lad who is hopefully earning a few quid, but to get to 300 fights and losing 290 of them then somebody somewhere is taking the piss out of people buying tickets - usually the friends and family of some 2-0 kid who is never going to get to area title level.
That lad whos 2-0 is probably living the dream, hell be a local celebrity and kris is just there to help him learn the trade and make a few quid for himself
And all the top fighters as well need the Laights of this world when they start off, good learning fights,
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23116
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by mickey1975 »

bripez wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 05:25 Nothing against the lad who is hopefully earning a few quid, but to get to 300 fights and losing 290 of them then somebody somewhere is taking the piss out of people buying tickets - usually the friends and family of some 2-0 kid who is never going to get to area title level.
“The lad” is an extremely competent boxer who will teach 99% of opponents an awful lot.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by bripez »

mickey1975 wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 09:05
bripez wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 05:25 Nothing against the lad who is hopefully earning a few quid, but to get to 300 fights and losing 290 of them then somebody somewhere is taking the piss out of people buying tickets - usually the friends and family of some 2-0 kid who is never going to get to area title level.
“The lad” is an extremely competent boxer who will teach 99% of opponents an awful lot.
This is always the stock answer on these type of threads.

What specifically will a boxer learn in this type of fight that they would not learn in a competitive sparring session, bearing in mind that the specific objective of the opponent is to not win, but also to not get stopped?
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by Oiky »

Thought laight retired
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28516
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by Coco »

bripez wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 10:03
mickey1975 wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 09:05
bripez wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 05:25 Nothing against the lad who is hopefully earning a few quid, but to get to 300 fights and losing 290 of them then somebody somewhere is taking the piss out of people buying tickets - usually the friends and family of some 2-0 kid who is never going to get to area title level.
“The lad” is an extremely competent boxer who will teach 99% of opponents an awful lot.
This is always the stock answer on these type of threads.

What specifically will a boxer learn in this type of fight that they would not learn in a competitive sparring session, bearing in mind that the specific objective of the opponent is to not win, but also to not get stopped?
You should know that doing something on fight night against someone you aren't familiar with is a lot different from learning in the gym against guys you are used to.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by bripez »

Coco wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 10:23
bripez wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 10:03
mickey1975 wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 09:05
“The lad” is an extremely competent boxer who will teach 99% of opponents an awful lot.
This is always the stock answer on these type of threads.

What specifically will a boxer learn in this type of fight that they would not learn in a competitive sparring session, bearing in mind that the specific objective of the opponent is to not win, but also to not get stopped?
You should know that doing something on fight night against someone you aren't familiar with is a lot different from learning in the gym against guys you are used to.
That's a fair point.

I still think that this is a peculiar practice that seems specific to boxing (eg. Man Utd reserves play Liverpool reserves - players of similar or better ability with both sides trying to win).

I almost didn't post as I didn't was this to come across as a dig at the journeymen boxers, which it isn't. I know that they are probably all much better than their records suggest.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28516
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by Coco »

I think it's fair to have a dig at the game but I'm defensive of the fighters
jonp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2081
Joined: 29 Mar 2007, 12:44

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by jonp »

spudder56 wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 07:29 Is kris making a comeback then ?
no
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by BitPlayer »

I thought he said a while back that he wanted to beat Strickland in terms of number of fights. Must have been mistaken, or he changed his mind.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26647
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by KiwiRider »

bripez wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 10:03
mickey1975 wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 09:05
bripez wrote: 21 Oct 2018, 05:25 Nothing against the lad who is hopefully earning a few quid, but to get to 300 fights and losing 290 of them then somebody somewhere is taking the piss out of people buying tickets - usually the friends and family of some 2-0 kid who is never going to get to area title level.
“The lad” is an extremely competent boxer who will teach 99% of opponents an awful lot.
This is always the stock answer on these type of threads.

What specifically will a boxer learn in this type of fight that they would not learn in a competitive sparring session, bearing in mind that the specific objective of the opponent is to not win, but also to not get stopped?
They get rounds in on a proper event. Big difference between a crowd and the gym. Laight was only stopped 5 times, so he always gave young fighters rounds. You learn less from blasting out guys in one or two rounds than having to go 6- Kris did that for them time and again.
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by PredatorHayds »

I think you can get different levels of ‘journeyman’.

I always prefer the Warburtons, Fidoes or a Prime Ambler who gave it a go and could spring the upset.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28516
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by Coco »

Ambler at his best really can fight, hard man too.
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by PredatorHayds »

Coco wrote: 24 Oct 2018, 08:32 Ambler at his best really can fight, hard man too.
He took rounds off some really good fighters.
Usually on 48 hours notice.
Never fought near his hometown once.
Top Bloke Ambler.
REEVE
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 776
Joined: 19 Apr 2010, 19:12

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by REEVE »

PredatorHayds wrote: 24 Oct 2018, 08:46
Coco wrote: 24 Oct 2018, 08:32 Ambler at his best really can fight, hard man too.
He took rounds off some really good fighters.
Usually on 48 hours notice.
Never fought near his hometown once.
Top Bloke Ambler.
Is jamie still boxing?

Be good to see him get to 100 fights
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by PredatorHayds »

REEVE wrote: 24 Oct 2018, 15:53
PredatorHayds wrote: 24 Oct 2018, 08:46
Coco wrote: 24 Oct 2018, 08:32 Ambler at his best really can fight, hard man too.
He took rounds off some really good fighters.
Usually on 48 hours notice.
Never fought near his hometown once.
Top Bloke Ambler.
Is jamie still boxing?

Be good to see him get to 100 fights
He’s going to have a think about it over Xmas mate.

He had a son at the beginning of the year and he’s enjoying that.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28516
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by Coco »

Ambler has fought them all and almost always gone the distance, Robin Reid, Matthew Barney, Tony Bellew, Paul Smith, Martin Murray, Liam Williams, Kerry Hope, Rocky Fielding and there is def a good few more who were British Champs.
I remember he was stopped a few times of late, against lesser opposition, which is prob an indication of things catching up with him.
Actually Laight got to 300 doing a lot of 4x2's against debutants, getting to 100 fighting as a journeyman against champions is a different kettle of fish
REEVE
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 776
Joined: 19 Apr 2010, 19:12

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by REEVE »

PredatorHayds wrote: 25 Oct 2018, 02:47
REEVE wrote: 24 Oct 2018, 15:53
PredatorHayds wrote: 24 Oct 2018, 08:46

He took rounds off some really good fighters.
Usually on 48 hours notice.
Never fought near his hometown once.
Top Bloke Ambler.
Is jamie still boxing?

Be good to see him get to 100 fights
He’s going to have a think about it over Xmas mate.

He had a son at the beginning of the year and he’s enjoying that.
Dont blame him mate i had twin girls 2 weeks ago its so hard to find time to do anything

Id love a few more its just getting back in shape thats hard
smiling assassin
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3225
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by smiling assassin »

REEVE wrote: 25 Oct 2018, 07:46
PredatorHayds wrote: 25 Oct 2018, 02:47
REEVE wrote: 24 Oct 2018, 15:53

Is jamie still boxing?

Be good to see him get to 100 fights
He’s going to have a think about it over Xmas mate.

He had a son at the beginning of the year and he’s enjoying that.
Dont blame him mate i had twin girls 2 weeks ago its so hard to find time to do anything

Id love a few more its just getting back in shape thats hard
Congratulations mate. You will get them
In a routine soon enough then you might find the time to train. Even when you do you might be to tired to train :lol:
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by PredatorHayds »

REEVE wrote: 25 Oct 2018, 07:46
PredatorHayds wrote: 25 Oct 2018, 02:47
REEVE wrote: 24 Oct 2018, 15:53

Is jamie still boxing?

Be good to see him get to 100 fights
He’s going to have a think about it over Xmas mate.

He had a son at the beginning of the year and he’s enjoying that.
Dont blame him mate i had twin girls 2 weeks ago its so hard to find time to do anything

Id love a few more its just getting back in shape thats hard
Congratulations mate
REEVE
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 776
Joined: 19 Apr 2010, 19:12

Re: Kristian Laight now has the most known losses in history?

Post by REEVE »

Thanks lads its a fuckin sleeping nitemare haha

As far as journeymen go brett fidoe or will warburton could win a title if it came to it.

Ive also seen nathan hardy batter a kid to fornicate dropped him aswell and get a ....DRAW !!
Post Reply