The fantasy match - M. Spinks (1985) vs. recent Usyk (200 lbs) ?

Post Reply

The fantasy match - M. Spinks (1985) vs. recent Usyk (200 lbs) ?

Spinks, decision
3
27%
Spinks, KO/TKO
1
9%
Too close to call
1
9%
Usyk, KO/TKO
3
27%
Usyk, decision
3
27%
 
Total votes: 11

ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

The fantasy match - M. Spinks (1985) vs. recent Usyk (200 lbs) ?

Post by ValMar »

What do you think ?
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: The fantasy match - M. Spinks (1985) vs. recent Usyk (200 lbs) ?

Post by Enlightened-One »

At 175lbs, Michael Spinks wins. At 200lbs or heavier, Oleksandr Usyk emerges victorious. The winner of both scenarios gains a decision victory, since neither guy are considered murderous punchers.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13874
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: The fantasy match - M. Spinks (1985) vs. recent Usyk (200 lbs) ?

Post by DrDuke »

A close matchup. Two extremely skillful boxers. Spinks was even a boxer-puncher. Usyk seems to be more polished though, what would have probably been a decisive factor. I slightly lean towards the Ukrainian.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: The fantasy match - M. Spinks (1985) vs. recent Usyk (200 lbs) ?

Post by Lackeos »

I don't think I'd pick anyone besides Holyfield to beat Spinks at cruiserweight.
fanman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 619
Joined: 05 Jun 2013, 19:56

Re: The fantasy match - M. Spinks (1985) vs. recent Usyk (200 lbs) ?

Post by fanman »

Lackeos wrote: 31 Oct 2018, 14:26 I don't think I'd pick anyone besides Holyfield to beat Spinks at cruiserweight.
fair enough, but there was no cruiserweight back then? i need to brush up on spinks, on paper he looks to be one of the best ever light heavies.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: The fantasy match - M. Spinks (1985) vs. recent Usyk (200 lbs) ?

Post by Onetimeonly »

Spinks by late ko or clear Dec.
ldlamb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 759
Joined: 30 Jun 2007, 23:51

Re: The fantasy match - M. Spinks (1985) vs. recent Usyk (200 lbs) ?

Post by ldlamb »

Enlightened-One wrote: 31 Oct 2018, 13:10 At 175lbs, Michael Spinks wins. At 200lbs or heavier, Oleksandr Usyk emerges victorious. The winner of both scenarios gains a decision victory, since neither guy are considered murderous punchers.
Maybe not at 200....but at Lt Heavy The Spinks Jinx was a big puncher. And he did knock out Cooney at Heavyweight.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: The fantasy match - M. Spinks (1985) vs. recent Usyk (200 lbs) ?

Post by Enlightened-One »

ldlamb wrote: 31 Oct 2018, 16:02
Enlightened-One wrote: 31 Oct 2018, 13:10 At 175lbs, Michael Spinks wins. At 200lbs or heavier, Oleksandr Usyk emerges victorious. The winner of both scenarios gains a decision victory, since neither guy are considered murderous punchers.
Maybe not at 200....but at Lt Heavy The Spinks Jinx was a big puncher. And he did knock out Cooney at Heavyweight.
Michael Spinks’ record at 175lbs and below was 27 victories, 19 by way of KO, with ten of those stoppages scored after the halfway point of the fight, which strongly suggests that the ‘Jinx’ carried out power to hurt most of his opponents, to the point that he would eventually wear them down.

He definitely wasn’t a murderous puncher at 175lbs and rarely scored one-punch type KO's.
ldlamb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 759
Joined: 30 Jun 2007, 23:51

Re: The fantasy match - M. Spinks (1985) vs. recent Usyk (200 lbs) ?

Post by ldlamb »

I didn’t realize one punch KOs were the only way to be a big puncher.

Spinks May have hurt his opponents and stopped them through accumulation and accuracy.....but he still hurt and stopped a lot of good opponents at 175.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: The fantasy match - M. Spinks (1985) vs. recent Usyk (200 lbs) ?

Post by Enlightened-One »

ldlamb wrote: 31 Oct 2018, 19:25 I didn’t realize one punch KOs were the only way to be a big puncher.

Spinks May have hurt his opponents and stopped them through accumulation and accuracy.....but he still hurt and stopped a lot of good opponents at 175.
I really don’t think we’re disagreeing here. I said that Michael Spinks wasn’t a murderous puncher. I didn’t claim that he was feather-fisted.

Only a third of Spinks’ 27 victories resulted from a KO being scored during the first half of their respective bouts.

The 'Jinx' was effective and carried enough power in his shots to hurt most guys, but he wasn't a "big" puncher.

Even dripping water eventually wears away stone, which is kind of analogous as to how Michael Spinks managed to stop his opponents.
Last edited by Enlightened-One on 31 Oct 2018, 19:50, edited 1 time in total.
ldlamb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 759
Joined: 30 Jun 2007, 23:51

Re: The fantasy match - M. Spinks (1985) vs. recent Usyk (200 lbs) ?

Post by ldlamb »

I still think we are disagreeing at least a little. Usyk, for example, overwhelmed Huck and was just landing a torrent of blows to get the stoppage. That is what I would call not a “big” puncher.

But Spinks would land hard, damaging blows throughout a fight that I would still label “big” punches. He might not have had APlus level one punch power (although Marvin Johnson might disagree) but the later round punches he landed to stop guys like Johnny Davis, Jerry Celestine or
Yaqui Lopez looked pretty “big” to me.
Post Reply