Due to a technicality (Charr's representatives not being allowed to be present at the opening of the B sample) the ruling could become void, allowing Charr to retain his belt.
Miller v Dinu looks like it could be unlikely be for the WBA belt due to Charr appealing and potentially filing civil suit OR Charr could still get stripped and file a suit and be offered a title shot in 4 years time which now has precedent
joshj909 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 08:02
Miller v Dinu looks like it could be unlikely be for the WBA belt due to Charr appealing and potentially filing civil suit OR Charr could still get stripped and file a suit and be offered a title shot in 4 years time which now has precedent
Could be a final eliminator? Man Charr hasn't fought in a year.
joshj909 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 08:02
Miller v Dinu looks like it could be unlikely be for the WBA belt due to Charr appealing and potentially filing civil suit OR Charr could still get stripped and file a suit and be offered a title shot in 4 years time which now has precedent
Could be a final eliminator? Man Charr hasn't fought in a year.
It might be, i would say that it would be bold to make a decision on it with a potential lawsuit pending bu this is the WBA.
Also, Arum made a point about Jennings being leapfrogged, against the WBA's own rules, for the discussed titlefight between Miller and Dinu so i imagine they would make an appeal for a final eliminator if the rules are similar aswell.
The Championships Chairman may notify the two highest ranked available boxers, or the highest ranked available regional champions, or a combination thereof, of the obligation to meet in an elimination bout to become a mandatory contender, giving them dates by which the negotiations must commence and be concluded.
Boxing Prospect wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:24
Finally the WBA may have them selves a situation where legal proceedings could stop their multiple title bollocks!
Or the WBA will just then have
Joshua
Charr
Bryan
Miller
Oquendo
Can all have world belts
Boxing Prospect wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:24
Finally the WBA may have them selves a situation where legal proceedings could stop their multiple title bollocks!
Or the WBA will just then have
Joshua
Charr
Bryan
Miller
Oquendo
Can all have world belts
Boxing Prospect wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:24
Finally the WBA may have them selves a situation where legal proceedings could stop their multiple title bollocks!
Or the WBA will just then have
Joshua
Charr
Bryan
Miller
Oquendo
Can all have world belts
Jennings v Oquendo for the mandated regular title-shot eliminator
Bryan v Miller/Dinu for the unified Interim Regular title
Charr v Joshua for the WBA unified super regular title
It's all so simple, i don't know what the fuss is about
Boxing Prospect wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:24
Finally the WBA may have them selves a situation where legal proceedings could stop their multiple title bollocks!
Or the WBA will just then have
Joshua
Charr
Bryan
Miller
Oquendo
Can all have world belts
Jennings v Oquendo for the mandated regular title-shot eliminator
Bryan v Miller/Dinu for the unified Interim Regular title
Charr v Joshua for the WBA unified super regular title
It's all so simple, i don't know what the fuss is about
Oquendo does not have to have a eliminator. He's guaranteed a title shot
Or the WBA will just then have
Joshua
Charr
Bryan
Miller
Oquendo
Can all have world belts
Jennings v Oquendo for the mandated regular title-shot eliminator
Bryan v Miller/Dinu for the unified Interim Regular title
Charr v Joshua for the WBA unified super regular title
It's all so simple, i don't know what the fuss is about
Oquendo does not have to have a eliminator. He's guaranteed a title shot
I was sarcastically pointing out that Jennings might end up filing a similar complaint to the one Oquendo did and mocking the claims people have to the belt/title shot.
Jennings v Oquendo for the mandated regular title-shot eliminator
Bryan v Miller/Dinu for the unified Interim Regular title
Charr v Joshua for the WBA unified super regular title
It's all so simple, i don't know what the fuss is about
Oquendo does not have to have a eliminator. He's guaranteed a title shot
I was sarcastically pointing out that Jennings might end up filing a similar complaint to the one Oquendo did and mocking the claims people have to the belt/title shot.
Sorry. I thought you were another nutcase who saw nothing wrong with the multi belt garbage.
So sorry
