Ruiz and Sanders aren't what I'd call in Golota's prime--- his back-to-back-to back title shots in the early 2000s was because most felt he was robbed against Byrd and a minority felt that he was robbed in the Ruiz fight, which brought about his blowout loss to Brewster. However, initially, his shot at Byrd was considered to be an easy fight for the IBF title holder because Golota wasn't considered to be anything but a fringe contender at the time--- don't forget not long before that he was brutalized by Tyson and Golota's trainer went off in a rant saying, "My fighter had no balls," only to find out that Golota had a broken neck and fractured cheek bones.
https://nypost.com/2004/11/14/golota-ro ... ight-fest/
Golota was considered "done" as a serious contender by many critics in the sport after the Lewis loss ('97) and he was completely written off in '99 after losing to Grant--- especially when Grant was annihilated by Lewis five months later. So when Golota fought Byrd, it was perceived as cannon fodder for Byrd.
As for Sanders, T-Rex suffered a detached retina during the fight. Not long after this, he'd knock out Oleg Masksaev--- so should we write off Sanders as some bum? No. He is what we call in boxing a spoiler. The man was Tyson's sparring partner. He could take hits. So I don't hold it against Golota as much as others would.
As for Norris, prior to the Golota fight he'd only been stopped THREE TIMES in his career--- so Norris was a helluva nut to crack. Not long before, Norris went the distance with Henry Akinwande, which is remarkable because Norris is only 5'9.5" and Akinwande was nearly a full foot taller. It must be noted, though, Vitali Klitschko knocked out Norris following the Golota fight. Could it be Golota softened Norris up for Vitali? Regardless, it can't be really held against Golota because Norris was one of boxing's toughest men.