Tyson Fury vs Ezzard Charles

Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Tyson Fury vs Ezzard Charles

Post by Onetimeonly »

I get it Rufus, you're socially inept even past your hideous appearance so typing a lot of words and pretending you're tough on the internet gives you a little self worth. Buck up little trooper. :TU:
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Tyson Fury vs Ezzard Charles

Post by HomicideHenry »

Little man, if calling me stupid and ugly is all you got--- I'm not worried about it--- because your balls have obviously not dropped yet.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Tyson Fury vs Ezzard Charles

Post by Onetimeonly »

Yes, a puny man calling me little is very hurtful. :roll:
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Tyson Fury vs Ezzard Charles

Post by HomicideHenry »

:TU: dynamite comes in a small package too
adislav123
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1745
Joined: 10 Nov 2012, 19:05

Re: Tyson Fury vs Ezzard Charles

Post by adislav123 »

HomicideHenry wrote: 10 Nov 2018, 14:54 :TU: dynamite comes in a small package too
You're maybe 175 cm tall, i'd really like to see your 75" reach measured on a clear picture. Cause i don't believe you, not one bit.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Tyson Fury vs Ezzard Charles

Post by Onetimeonly »

adislav123 wrote: 13 Nov 2018, 00:04
HomicideHenry wrote: 10 Nov 2018, 14:54 :TU: dynamite comes in a small package too
You're maybe 175 cm tall, i'd really like to see your 75" reach measured on a clear picture. Cause i don't believe you, not one bit.
He's a hobbit
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Tyson Fury vs Ezzard Charles

Post by HomicideHenry »

BoxRec lists me at 75", and I don't have anything to prove to you or anyone--- every single person is built different. Tommy Burns was 5'7" and had a 75" reach. It's not unusual for someone to have a longer reach or shorter reach than expected because from fingertip to fingertip you're accounting for the length of hands, forearms, etc. I have 8" long hands. So that's 16" right there.
Post Reply