Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

adislav123
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1745
Joined: 10 Nov 2012, 19:05

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by adislav123 »

Ever heard of BDD? You clearly suffer from it, in no way did it seem you are same height, weight than him. Nor in any physical condition remotely resembling any serious boxer's physique where you should have been allowed to enter that ring.

You're right you didn't say any of that shit, i did. You're a bullshit artist wannabe fighter obsessed with your own body & martial arts.

I'm just pointing out facts to correct your delusional statements your mental disorder forces you to come up with. Period.

On the other hand i 100% respect your knowledge of the history of boxing and have no ill thought against you personally. Sure you're a nice guy.

Regarding your suspicion i may be an alias or whatever. I'm not, i'm me, this is the only account i'm writing shit under, but i have a life outside boxrec. Just started to comment recently but grew tired of the tedious, repetetive, retarded tirade allmost every post turns into fast with people stating the same shit 30 times and insulting each other.

So i'm reading over the threads from time to time & if something catches my interest like the bullshit you came up with comparing the difference in apparent height between ali, foreman & holmes to your's & jleon love's which is objectively based on nothing but your body dysmorphic disorder i may point that out. I call bullshit on you! Bullshit! Horseshit! Penguinshit! Bullshit Artist!

Don't take it to serious, i don't. Fair play.
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by ewenhay »

Cojimar 1946 wrote: 12 Nov 2018, 21:47 Ali is also frequently listed at 6'2 1/2 and seems to have stated he was 6'2 1/2. That combined with photographic evidence points to him being 6'2 1/2. His drivers license also apparently listed him as 6'2 1/2.
Do you think he might have been 6'2 1/2 then?
adislav123
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1745
Joined: 10 Nov 2012, 19:05

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by adislav123 »

6' 2 11/20" if you ask me, that's morning height.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by HomicideHenry »

And you're a lunatic. The OBSESSION of some of the guys here on BoxRec with me personally--- my life, my job, where I live, etc--- in a real life scenario would be extremely disturbing, and would warrant restraining orders.

I never claimed that I was in the same shape--- you dumbass--- I never claimed that I was a "boxer" or had any skills--- you prick--- I never claimed to be deserving of that spot on that card--- you waste of your father's sperm--- you know NOTHING of why or how that match came about. So don't make any claims on my behalf when you don't know NOTHING about anything concerning me.

I showed pictures showing that him and I look identical (once again) IN TERMS OF HEIGHT--- but he's actually much taller and heavier than I was--- because I have WIDE SHOULDERS and a NARROW WAIST and THICK ARMS (not well defined but still big arms).

Image

Now, my SHOULDER TO WAIST RATIO is apparent--- my arms are also THICK though not the greatest of shape--- I never claimed great condition or great skills, etc. You're the one stuck on something that doesn't exist. Now, you best STOP with the harassment or I'll have to get in touch with John Shepherd who runs the forum. I'm tired of the bullshit.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15182
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Cojimar 1946 wrote: 12 Nov 2018, 15:24 Prior to his transition to heavyweight Holyfield was always listed as 6'1 1/4. It's very rare for heights to be understated thus I'm inclined to believe that was his height.

Ali is listed at 6'2 1/2 vs Liston and Chuvalo and appears shorter than guys listed at 6'3 such as George Foreman and Larry Holmes.
Ali was almost always listed at 6'3. He looked taller. He didn't look shorter than Foreman and Holmes. btw-Foreman and Holmes sometimes are listed at 6'4.
Why in the world is this so important to you?
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by Onetimeonly »

Lol at Hank. No gay porn please.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by HomicideHenry »

And you're probably some needle dick fat hogfucker who likes to play boxing critic from his mother's sofabed in the basement--- jealous much porky? You're contempt is showing.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by Onetimeonly »

HomicideHenry wrote: 13 Nov 2018, 12:46 And you're probably some needle dick fat hogfucker who likes to play boxing critic from his mother's sofabed in the basement--- jealous much porky? You're contempt is showing.
Wow, you couldn't last 5 minutes with me as a foe. Another failure for you.
prewarboxing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 641
Joined: 22 Jul 2007, 02:58

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by prewarboxing »

Come on guys. FFS. There's no need for this. We are all friends here

Miles Templeton
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by ewenhay »

See what happens when someone starts a thread called Langford v Helenius?

Just creates some empty space for things to kick off
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24715
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by Tony1244 »

HomicideHenry wrote: 13 Nov 2018, 11:15 And you're a lunatic. The OBSESSION of some of the guys here on BoxRec with me personally--- my life, my job, where I live, etc--- in a real life scenario would be extremely disturbing, and would warrant restraining orders.

I never claimed that I was in the same shape--- you dumbass--- I never claimed that I was a "boxer" or had any skills--- you prick--- I never claimed to be deserving of that spot on that card--- you waste of your father's sperm--- you know NOTHING of why or how that match came about. So don't make any claims on my behalf when you don't know NOTHING about anything concerning me.

I showed pictures showing that him and I look identical (once again) IN TERMS OF HEIGHT--- but he's actually much taller and heavier than I was--- because I have WIDE SHOULDERS and a NARROW WAIST and THICK ARMS (not well defined but still big arms).

Image

Now, my SHOULDER TO WAIST RATIO is apparent--- my arms are also THICK though not the greatest of shape--- I never claimed great condition or great skills, etc. You're the one stuck on something that doesn't exist. Now, you best STOP with the harassment or I'll have to get in touch with John Shepherd who runs the forum. I'm tired of the bullshit.
adislav123
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1745
Joined: 10 Nov 2012, 19:05

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by adislav123 »

I apologize rufus, didn't mean to make you cry. By watching the fight again i came to the realisation that indeed despite you being much smaller & lighter one gets the impression of you being as tall & heavy as jleonlove. No doubt about it. My fault, i didn't analyze the footage good enough at first but now i can see it. I swear i can see it. Please don't inform john about my mishap.

Reason for looking much taller is that you are an extremely broad shouldered, narrow hipped, not overly defined but hugely, really thick armed human being. Your wide shoulders are beautiful, your superthick gunz are amazingly thick and your hips so narrow, one of a kind, makes you seem much taller than you really are.

Please refrain from getting in touch with john shepard, please don't do that. I'm sorry baby!
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by HomicideHenry »

Sarcasm doesn't suit you.

Onto the foe list with you too.
oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by oogiebe »

Well this thread started out silly and got down right ridiculous.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24715
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by Tony1244 »

oogiebe wrote: 13 Nov 2018, 19:09 Well this thread started out silly and got down right ridiculous.
Now, you wouldn't be insinuating that Beavis' response was silly or ridiculous, would you?

Or for that matter, Langford vs Helenius, which we all think about everyday. :lol:
oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by oogiebe »

Tony1244 wrote: 14 Nov 2018, 12:10
oogiebe wrote: 13 Nov 2018, 19:09 Well this thread started out silly and got down right ridiculous.
Now, you wouldn't be insinuating that Beavis' response was silly or ridiculous, would you?

Or for that matter, Langford vs Helenius, which we all think about everyday. :lol:
lol!!!!
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by Ezzard »

Helenius is a decent fighter and has a huge size advantage but here it's not enough. Langford would win and convincingly so.
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Sam Langford vs Robert Helenius

Post by ewenhay »

Ezzard wrote: 15 Nov 2018, 07:20 Helenius is a decent fighter and has a huge size advantage but here it's not enough. Langford would win and convincingly so.
A valiant effort in trying to get the thread back on topic
Post Reply