Tyson Fury

Post Reply
Mighty Atom
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 262
Joined: 11 Oct 2008, 19:00

Tyson Fury

Post by Mighty Atom »

Note - Tyson Fury's win over Christian Hammer in 2015 was changed to a no contest by the terms of his UKAD anti-doping decision
https://www.ukad.org.uk/assets/uploads/ ... e_Fury.pdf

Ditto Hughie Fury v Rudenko.

UKAD overrules any decision the BBBoC makes.
John
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9050
Joined: 08 May 2000, 20:00

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by John »

Nonsense, bbbofc is the authority not ukad, bbbofc did not reverse result.
Mighty Atom
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 262
Joined: 11 Oct 2008, 19:00

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by Mighty Atom »

Read the decision.
BBBoC is bound by the ruling or else they lose their anti-doping status

UKAD are the final authority here.
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by claudevsq »

Didn't John just tell you the opposite? Trust me, you might believe him, after all, he and Marina founded BoxRec back in 2001. Plus, John lives in UK, so, he should know, right?
Mighty Atom
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 262
Joined: 11 Oct 2008, 19:00

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by Mighty Atom »

In this case though I know I'm correct.
The British Board are signatories to the WADA anti-doping which means they have to apply the decisions of UK Anti-Doping.

And in this case it's pretty clear what that decision was:

In accordance with UK ADR Article 9.1, the result of Tyson Fury’s fight on 28 February 2015
against Christian Hammer is disqualified, and any and all titles, prize money and ranking
points that he secured as a result of his victory in that fight are forfeited

This document constitutes the final decision resolving and terminating the Nandrolone
Proceedings and the Refusal Proceedings, in accordance with UK ADR Article 7.7.4. It shall
be formally notified to WADA and the British Boxing Board of Control (BBBoC) in accordance
with UK ADR Article 13.7 (WADA and the BBBoC being the only third parties of which the
Parties are aware that have a right of appeal against this decision pursuant to UK ADR Article
13).
Post Reply