Brother Mike had same tragic ending if memory serves.
very exciting era at heavies
Re: very exciting era at heavies
That's right. They both had the same condition which caused their brains to be especially susceptible to dementia brought on by the impact of punches. There were four brothers. Jerry and Mike were world level, a third brother was a journeyman and the fourth didn't box.
I don't know if the third brother suffered the same fate. Presumably the non-boxing brother was ok but that's just an assumption.
I don't know if the third brother suffered the same fate. Presumably the non-boxing brother was ok but that's just an assumption.
-
OH_RickNMorty
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 92
- Joined: 09 Oct 2018, 17:50
Re: very exciting era at heavies
May I ask what the Gold and Bronze Age are in Boxing?Syntax Error wrote: ↑02 Dec 2018, 07:20 It's a real shame that Fury abused himself, because we could potentially having an HW Bronze age.
The division is certainly at It's most intriguing since the 90s HW Silver age.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9008
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: very exciting era at heavies
I sort of made it up.OH_RickNMorty wrote: ↑14 Dec 2018, 17:39May I ask what the Gold and Bronze Age are in Boxing?Syntax Error wrote: ↑02 Dec 2018, 07:20 It's a real shame that Fury abused himself, because we could potentially having an HW Bronze age.
The division is certainly at It's most intriguing since the 90s HW Silver age.
The 70s is widely regarded as the golden era of HW boxing.
If this is the case, then the 90s are arguably the second best era, therefore silver age.
If this current crop of top HWs keep fighting each other, we might well experience the 3rd best era, bronze age.
The only problem is once we happen upon another great HW era in the future, I don't know what medal based appendage I can give that.
Re: very exciting era at heavies
Is anything pre-70s the stone age of heavyweight boxing?Syntax Error wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 05:26I sort of made it up.OH_RickNMorty wrote: ↑14 Dec 2018, 17:39May I ask what the Gold and Bronze Age are in Boxing?Syntax Error wrote: ↑02 Dec 2018, 07:20 It's a real shame that Fury abused himself, because we could potentially having an HW Bronze age.
The division is certainly at It's most intriguing since the 90s HW Silver age.
The 70s is widely regarded as the golden era of HW boxing.
If this is the case, then the 90s are arguably the second best era, therefore silver age.
If this current crop of top HWs keep fighting each other, we might well experience the 3rd best era, bronze age.
The only problem is once we happen upon another great HW era in the future, I don't know what medal based appendage I can give that.
Re: very exciting era at heavies
Before Tunney emerged, it had been sorta The Stone Age.Gnome wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 05:43Is anything pre-70s the stone age of heavyweight boxing?Syntax Error wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 05:26I sort of made it up.
The 70s is widely regarded as the golden era of HW boxing.
If this is the case, then the 90s are arguably the second best era, therefore silver age.
If this current crop of top HWs keep fighting each other, we might well experience the 3rd best era, bronze age.
The only problem is once we happen upon another great HW era in the future, I don't know what medal based appendage I can give that.![]()
Re: very exciting era at heavies
Yeah... And also Klitschko's dog ate his heavy bag and sparring partners, so it was really impossible for Wlad to prepare for Fury bout.getnada wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 07:45Klitschko was in an emotional roller coaster because his wife was sick and Fury managed to abuse that and knows he will never succeed again. That's why Fury till the day of today doesn't dare to give him the rematch. Fury can easely give a rematch on the undercard of AJ vs Wilder, so there's no excuse left for that either. Klitschko is better then Fury and Fury just met him at a lucky moment and he knows that very well. If anyone lost a match against Fury, it's Wilder. Wilder lost with a far bigger margine then Klitschko did.
Re: very exciting era at heavies
There are so many variables to a prize fight. So many opportunities for excuses. The only aspect that matters is the result. If a fighter is not 100%, for whatever the reason, but still participates, then none of that matters. Only the result as I mentioned. A win is a win is a win.DrDuke wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 09:53Yeah... And also Klitschko's dog ate his heavy bag and sparring partners, so it was really impossible for Wlad to prepare for Fury bout.getnada wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 07:45Klitschko was in an emotional roller coaster because his wife was sick and Fury managed to abuse that and knows he will never succeed again. That's why Fury till the day of today doesn't dare to give him the rematch. Fury can easely give a rematch on the undercard of AJ vs Wilder, so there's no excuse left for that either. Klitschko is better then Fury and Fury just met him at a lucky moment and he knows that very well. If anyone lost a match against Fury, it's Wilder. Wilder lost with a far bigger margine then Klitschko did.
Re: very exciting era at heavies
Fury in kind of reasonable condition would beat any version of Wlad any time. Does that mean that Fury is a better fighter than Wlad? No it doesn't, and he isn't, but he does have the combination of attributes for which even a prime Wlad has no antidote.
In my not terribly humble opinion obviously.
In my not terribly humble opinion obviously.
Re: very exciting era at heavies
Styles make fights and Fury isn't going to make anyone look good ever. He could be beat, but there'll be a lot of frustration and awkwardness during the fight. He's a unique individual. Sort of a Jimmy Young at 6'9". Not an insult. Just makes you look bad.candyslim wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 14:59 Fury in kind of reasonable condition would beat any version of Wlad any time. Does that mean that Fury is a better fighter than Wlad? No it doesn't, and he isn't, but he does have the combination of attributes for which even a prime Wlad has no antidote.
In my not terribly humble opinion obviously.
Re: very exciting era at heavies
Jimmy Young. Ah yes I bet George still has bad dreams about him ![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: very exciting era at heavies
He was a good body puncher. I met him when I was a kid so I cheered for him. Oddly, he'd be an action fighter today!
Re: very exciting era at heavies
He was a slippery eel.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 16:37He was a good body puncher. I met him when I was a kid so I cheered for him. Oddly, he'd be an action fighter today!
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: very exciting era at heavies
For sure, but I guarantee he threw a lot more punches than fury or wilder on average. To be fair, the Ali fight was all time abysmal.oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 16:39He was a slippery eel.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 16:37He was a good body puncher. I met him when I was a kid so I cheered for him. Oddly, he'd be an action fighter today!
Re: very exciting era at heavies
Young should've been warned and then penalized for slipping between the ropes to get away from shots. I couldn't stand that shite.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 16:42For sure, but I guarantee he threw a lot more punches than fury or wilder on average. To be fair, the Ali fight was all time abysmal.oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 16:39He was a slippery eel.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 16:37
He was a good body puncher. I met him when I was a kid so I cheered for him. Oddly, he'd be an action fighter today!
Re: very exciting era at heavies
I dunno about thatOnetimeonly wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 16:37He was a good body puncher. I met him when I was a kid so I cheered for him. Oddly, he'd be an action fighter today!
Are you from Philly One time?
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: very exciting era at heavies
No, I'm from Baltimore.candyslim wrote: ↑16 Dec 2018, 10:29I dunno about thatOnetimeonly wrote: ↑15 Dec 2018, 16:37He was a good body puncher. I met him when I was a kid so I cheered for him. Oddly, he'd be an action fighter today!![]()
Are you from Philly One time?
Re: very exciting era at heavies
Home to the greatest show ever broadcast on TV ... by a distance.
I'm sure you must have heard that a thousand times.
I'm sure you must have heard that a thousand times.
-
sweetviolenturge
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 677
- Joined: 28 Mar 2015, 08:28
Re: very exciting era at heavies
Now, there's a potential match-up that never occurred back in the '70s that could have but didn't. Jerry Quarry vs Jimmy Young.
Unfortunately, by the time that such a bout would have been in demand in 1975 or so, Jerry was past his best & Young was just beginning his short-lived prime so I'd have to give it to Jimmy via a 12 round decision. Maybe even a late rounds cuts TKO.
Unfortunately, by the time that such a bout would have been in demand in 1975 or so, Jerry was past his best & Young was just beginning his short-lived prime so I'd have to give it to Jimmy via a 12 round decision. Maybe even a late rounds cuts TKO.