Hearn's options for Joshua, April 2019

[ValMar]

Hearn announced the options for April 2019 :

1. Wilder
2. Fury
3. Whyte/Chisora winner
4. Usyk
5. Ortiz

Not so bad......................

[ewenhay]

This has been done before.

You have won one of the following prizes.

1. A new car
2. £50000
3. An all expenses paid holiday for 2 in the Bahamas
4. A 75" sony 4k television
5. High Street shopping vouchers


Please call the following number to claim your prize 08000800800*

*Calls cost £10 per minute

[tiny_acres]

Hearn announced the options for April 2019 :

1. Wilder
2. Fury
3. Whyte/Chisora winner
4. Usyk
5. Ortiz

Not so bad......................

The only option on there that is remotely possible is Whyte/Chisora

[Cyclops]

This has been done before.

You have won one of the following prizes.

1. A new car
2. £50000
3. An all expenses paid holiday for 2 in the Bahamas
4. A 75" sony 4k television
5. High Street shopping vouchers


Please call the following number to claim your prize 08000800800*

*Calls cost £10 per minute

Very good.

[oogiebe]

I've seen so many quotes and comments from Hearn about Whyte; Wilder; Fury; Miller; and yes Wlad. Does the man have no sense of integrity in what he spews. Now I hear they may cancel the April reservation at Wembley. I'm beginning not to care. Just tell me who AJ is fighting already. Oh yeah...he left off Sokolowski.

[Thomastearns]

This has been done before.

You have won one of the following prizes.

1. A new car
2. £50000
3. An all expenses paid holiday for 2 in the Bahamas
4. A 75" sony 4k television
5. High Street shopping vouchers


Please call the following number to claim your prize 08000800800*

*Calls cost £10 per minute

Very good.

Yes, and equally likely to be true. Talk about painting yourself into a corner.

[SteveO]

Doesn't he have to fight a mandatory against Pulev at some point?

[kbackup408]

Doesn't he have to fight a mandatory against Pulev at some point?

in 2020 is when the IBF mandatory is due

[tiny_acres]

Doesn't he have to fight a mandatory against Pulev at some point?

in 2020 is when the IBF mandatory is due

How is that possible. His last mandatory ibf defense was against #7 Takam when then #1 contender Pulev pulled out. That was in 2017.

[kbackup408]

Doesn't he have to fight a mandatory against Pulev at some point?

in 2020 is when the IBF mandatory is due

How is that possible. His last mandatory ibf defense was against #7 Takam when then #1 contender Pulev pulled out. That was in 2017.

It works in order so his last IBF mandatory was Takam next came Povetkin (WBA), next one WBO mandatory (2019) then back to IBF in 2020

[tiny_acres]

in 2020 is when the IBF mandatory is due

How is that possible. His last mandatory ibf defense was against #7 Takam when then #1 contender Pulev pulled out. That was in 2017.

It works in order so his last IBF mandatory was Takam next came Povetkin (WBA), next one WBO mandatory (2019) then back to IBF in 2020

Ibf clearly states mandatories must be every 12 months.
Fury was stripped nearly immediately for not scheduling a mandatory against Charles

[kbackup408]

How is that possible. His last mandatory ibf defense was against #7 Takam when then #1 contender Pulev pulled out. That was in 2017.

It works in order so his last IBF mandatory was Takam next came Povetkin (WBA), next one WBO mandatory (2019) then back to IBF in 2020

Ibf clearly states mandatories must be every 12 months.
Fury was stripped nearly immediately for not scheduling a mandatory against Charles

yes mate, but not when you have unified it then runs in order of the belts mandatories

[tiny_acres]

It works in order so his last IBF mandatory was Takam next came Povetkin (WBA), next one WBO mandatory (2019) then back to IBF in 2020

Ibf clearly states mandatories must be every 12 months.
Fury was stripped nearly immediately for not scheduling a mandatory against Charles

yes mate, but not when you have unified it then runs in order of the belts mandatories

I really am not trying to argue. Other unified champs have had their big belts stripped including Fury for not following ing protocol.
Now they have a cash cow in Joshua and the rules can be vent.
I'm not trying to say you're wrong. I'm saying for those that praised the big when they stripped Fury for having integrity that there is no integrity in the alphabet groups

[jujigatame]

I hope it's Usyk. He beats everyone else on that list.

[kbackup408]

Ibf clearly states mandatories must be every 12 months.
Fury was stripped nearly immediately for not scheduling a mandatory against Charles

yes mate, but not when you have unified it then runs in order of the belts mandatories

I really am not trying to argue. Other unified champs have had their big belts stripped including Fury for not following ing protocol.
Now they have a cash cow in Joshua and the rules can be vent.
I'm not trying to say you're wrong. I'm saying for those that praised the big when they stripped Fury for having integrity that there is no integrity in the alphabet groups

pal I am on your side on this one, it makes me sick what the IBF done to Fury and I give absolutely no f*cks about these alphabets for me Tyson Fury is #1 in the division till you beat him you can't be best of your era!

[tiny_acres]

yes mate, but not when you have unified it then runs in order of the belts mandatories

I really am not trying to argue. Other unified champs have had their big belts stripped including Fury for not following ing protocol.
Now they have a cash cow in Joshua and the rules can be vent.
I'm not trying to say you're wrong. I'm saying for those that praised the big when they stripped Fury for having integrity that there is no integrity in the alphabet groups

pal I am on your side on this one, it makes me sick what the IBF done to Fury and I give absolutely no f*cks about these alphabets for me Tyson Fury is #1 in the division till you beat him you can't be best of your era!

you are correct