Enlightened-One wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 19:05
You possess the sheer audacity of calling me a fûckîng idiot, but I only challenged the bûllshît figure you supplied about Terence Crawford.
In fact three other forum members provided their own links to this thread to articles they found that supported my stance.
Don’t be a fûckîng cûnt and lie to the forum by pretending you’ve proven me wrong, when all you’ve fûckîng proved is that you can’t read!
You lied and have chosen to dishonesty employ red herring debating tactics to distract the reader from discovering the nonsense you’ve written!
Quote my post that challenges your assertion about GGG’s net wealth.
If you can’t, then admit to the forum that you’re a lying cûnt and shut the fûck up!
Come on kiddo, I dare you to try harder and prove me wrong!
FFS! You claim that Vasyl Lomachenko and Sergey Kovalev both owe a huge debt of gratitude to Tom Loeffler, even though that promoter never worked with those men! I doubt he even spoke to them, other than saying “hi”, because Loeffler only speaks English.
Jesus fûckîng Christ! Are you not embarrassed?
I’m actually really looking forward, no excited, to read your reply, because you shouldn’t argue with someone if you can’t read!
Dude, are you a little Downsy? Be honest as I’d never insult a person mentally handicapped.
#1- Find where I said that GGG paved the way for KOVALEV. TRY TO FIND IT HERE OR ELSEWHERE. You can’t. Wanna know why? Because I never said and you just prove the ignorance that your reputation has always called for by proving that you don’t even read the other posts that you are conversing with. What’s the point of even doing this with you?
#2. I supplied you with GGG’s net worth and proof to back the estimated figures. You claimed he was worth less than that but I proved that you’re wrong.
So where would you like to take this? What am I missing here? You’re not showing the ref enough this round so he’s gotta stop the fight. You call me a c”nt for owning you for the 3rd straight issue and that’s equivalent to leaving the ring before the post fight interviews. It’s low class, but low class is an upgrade for your less than stellar history here.
YOU CANNOT FÛCKÎNG READ! YOU ARE ARGUING OVER CERTAIN POINTS THAT I NEVER BOTHERED TO ARGUE WITH!!!
QUOTE MY FÛCKÎNG WORDS IN FUTURE. AS IT’LL PROVE YOU’RE CHALLENGING SOMETHING I’VE ACTUALLY SAID!!!
TWO QUICK REPLIES THOUGH:
TOM LOEFFLER HAD ABSOLUTELY FÛCK ALL TO DO WITH THE SUCCESS THAT VASYL LOMACHENKO AND SERGEY KOVALEV GAINED DURING THEIR CAREERS. DON’T FÛCKÎNG PRETEND THAT YOU CLAIMED OTHERWISE, BECAUSE I CAN QUOTE YOUR FÛCKÎNG HIDEOUSLY MÔRÔNÎC WORDS!!!
ALSO, YOU CITED FÛCKÎNG BÛLLSHÎT FIGURES RELATED TO TERENCE CRAWFORD’S NET WORTH. FOUR FÛCKÎNG FORUM POSTERS DEBUNKED YOUR FÛCKÎNG STUPID CLAIMS!
YOU KEEP AGRESSIVELY CITING GGG’S NET WEALTH, BUT I’VE NEVER COMMENTED ON IT. SO WHO THE FÛCK ARE YOU ARGUING WITH? DON’T QUOTE THESE FIGURES TO ME EVER AGAIN, BECAUSE I’M NOT FÛCKÎNG INTERESTED, SINCE YOU’RE CLEARLY DEBATING WITH A FIGMENT OF YOUR IMAGINATION!!!
FINALLY, LEARN TO FÛCKÎNG READ YOU THICK TWÀT! YOU IGNORE WHAT PEOPLE SAY AND START ARGUING AGAINST THINGS THAT NOBODY FÛCKÎNG MENTIONED!
IF YOU THINK I’M WRONG ABOUT THIS, THEN QUOTE MY FÛCKÎNG WORDS, YOU ILLITERATE TWÀT!
Jesus christ, relax. It's just a forum, enjoy life.
Dude, are you a little Downsy? Be honest as I’d never insult a person mentally handicapped.
#1- Find where I said that GGG paved the way for KOVALEV. TRY TO FIND IT HERE OR ELSEWHERE. You can’t. Wanna know why? Because I never said and you just prove the ignorance that your reputation has always called for by proving that you don’t even read the other posts that you are conversing with. What’s the point of even doing this with you?
#2. I supplied you with GGG’s net worth and proof to back the estimated figures. You claimed he was worth less than that but I proved that you’re wrong.
So where would you like to take this? What am I missing here? You’re not showing the ref enough this round so he’s gotta stop the fight. You call me a c”nt for owning you for the 3rd straight issue and that’s equivalent to leaving the ring before the post fight interviews. It’s low class, but low class is an upgrade for your less than stellar history here.
YOU CANNOT FÛCKÎNG READ! YOU ARE ARGUING OVER CERTAIN POINTS THAT I NEVER BOTHERED TO ARGUE WITH!!!
QUOTE MY FÛCKÎNG WORDS IN FUTURE. AS IT’LL PROVE YOU’RE CHALLENGING SOMETHING I’VE ACTUALLY SAID!!!
TWO QUICK REPLIES THOUGH:
TOM LOEFFLER HAD ABSOLUTELY FÛCK ALL TO DO WITH THE SUCCESS THAT VASYL LOMACHENKO AND SERGEY KOVALEV GAINED DURING THEIR CAREERS. DON’T FÛCKÎNG PRETEND THAT YOU CLAIMED OTHERWISE, BECAUSE I CAN QUOTE YOUR FÛCKÎNG HIDEOUSLY MÔRÔNÎC WORDS!!!
ALSO, YOU CITED FÛCKÎNG BÛLLSHÎT FIGURES RELATED TO TERENCE CRAWFORD’S NET WORTH. FOUR FÛCKÎNG FORUM POSTERS DEBUNKED YOUR FÛCKÎNG STUPID CLAIMS!
YOU KEEP AGRESSIVELY CITING GGG’S NET WEALTH, BUT I’VE NEVER COMMENTED ON IT. SO WHO THE FÛCK ARE YOU ARGUING WITH? DON’T QUOTE THESE FIGURES TO ME EVER AGAIN, BECAUSE I’M NOT FÛCKÎNG INTERESTED, SINCE YOU’RE CLEARLY DEBATING WITH A FIGMENT OF YOUR IMAGINATION!!!
FINALLY, LEARN TO FÛCKÎNG READ YOU THICK TWÀT! YOU IGNORE WHAT PEOPLE SAY AND START ARGUING AGAINST THINGS THAT NOBODY FÛCKÎNG MENTIONED!
IF YOU THINK I’M WRONG ABOUT THIS, THEN QUOTE MY FÛCKÎNG WORDS, YOU ILLITERATE TWÀT!
Jesus christ, relax. It's just a forum, enjoy life.
I do enjoy life. And I’m perfectly relaxed.
It’s just that I’ve learned that you have to adopt a certain tone when you’re communicating with the intellectually-challenged members of the forum.
If I keep saying the same things over and over again, but my words keep getting ignored by certain people who pretend they’re arguing against things I’ve never said, then I feel I have to make things crystal clear.
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑04 Jan 2019, 19:05
You possess the sheer audacity of calling me a fûckîng idiot, but I only challenged the bûllshît figure you supplied about Terence Crawford.
In fact three other forum members provided their own links to this thread to articles they found that supported my stance.
Don’t be a fûckîng cûnt and lie to the forum by pretending you’ve proven me wrong, when all you’ve fûckîng proved is that you can’t read!
You lied and have chosen to dishonesty employ red herring debating tactics to distract the reader from discovering the nonsense you’ve written!
Quote my post that challenges your assertion about GGG’s net wealth.
If you can’t, then admit to the forum that you’re a lying cûnt and shut the fûck up!
Come on kiddo, I dare you to try harder and prove me wrong!
FFS! You claim that Vasyl Lomachenko and Sergey Kovalev both owe a huge debt of gratitude to Tom Loeffler, even though that promoter never worked with those men! I doubt he even spoke to them, other than saying “hi”, because Loeffler only speaks English.
Jesus fûckîng Christ! Are you not embarrassed?
I’m actually really looking forward, no excited, to read your reply, because you shouldn’t argue with someone if you can’t read!
Dude, are you a little Downsy? Be honest as I’d never insult a person mentally handicapped.
#1- Find where I said that GGG paved the way for KOVALEV. TRY TO FIND IT HERE OR ELSEWHERE. You can’t. Wanna know why? Because I never said and you just prove the ignorance that your reputation has always called for by proving that you don’t even read the other posts that you are conversing with. What’s the point of even doing this with you?
#2. I supplied you with GGG’s net worth and proof to back the estimated figures. You claimed he was worth less than that but I proved that you’re wrong.
So where would you like to take this? What am I missing here? You’re not showing the ref enough this round so he’s gotta stop the fight. You call me a c”nt for owning you for the 3rd straight issue and that’s equivalent to leaving the ring before the post fight interviews. It’s low class, but low class is an upgrade for your less than stellar history here.
YOU CANNOT FÛCKÎNG READ! YOU ARE ARGUING OVER CERTAIN POINTS THAT I NEVER BOTHERED TO ARGUE WITH!!!
QUOTE MY FÛCKÎNG WORDS IN FUTURE. AS IT’LL PROVE YOU’RE CHALLENGING SOMETHING I’VE ACTUALLY SAID!!!
TWO QUICK REPLIES THOUGH:
TOM LOEFFLER HAD ABSOLUTELY FÛCK ALL TO DO WITH THE SUCCESS THAT VASYL LOMACHENKO AND SERGEY KOVALEV GAINED DURING THEIR CAREERS. DON’T FÛCKÎNG PRETEND THAT YOU CLAIMED OTHERWISE, BECAUSE I CAN QUOTE YOUR FÛCKÎNG HIDEOUSLY MÔRÔNÎC WORDS!!!
ALSO, YOU CITED FÛCKÎNG BÛLLSHÎT FIGURES RELATED TO TERENCE CRAWFORD’S NET WORTH. FOUR FÛCKÎNG FORUM POSTERS DEBUNKED YOUR FÛCKÎNG STUPID CLAIMS!
YOU KEEP AGRESSIVELY CITING GGG’S NET WEALTH, BUT I’VE NEVER COMMENTED ON IT. SO WHO THE FÛCK ARE YOU ARGUING WITH? DON’T QUOTE THESE FIGURES TO ME EVER AGAIN, BECAUSE I’M NOT FÛCKÎNG INTERESTED, SINCE YOU’RE CLEARLY DEBATING WITH A FIGMENT OF YOUR IMAGINATION!!!
FINALLY, LEARN TO FÛCKÎNG READ YOU THICK TWÀT! YOU IGNORE WHAT PEOPLE SAY AND START ARGUING AGAINST THINGS THAT NOBODY FÛCKÎNG MENTIONED!
IF YOU THINK I’M WRONG ABOUT THIS, THEN QUOTE MY FÛCKÎNG WORDS, YOU ILLITERATE TWÀT!
Here’s the typical post of a poor loser. No wonder you don’t have a broad. Lol. I feel for you man. Just say that you’ve been beaten yet again and maybe people wouldn’t hate everything about you. Lol. What an absolute zero you are. Lolololololololololol. Never answered to anything and just made shit up. Ur sad. Don’t comment on my shit anymore. You’ve been handed your lunch consistently every time you have. It’s not in your best interest dick.
Dude, are you a little Downsy? Be honest as I’d never insult a person mentally handicapped.
#1- Find where I said that GGG paved the way for KOVALEV. TRY TO FIND IT HERE OR ELSEWHERE. You can’t. Wanna know why? Because I never said and you just prove the ignorance that your reputation has always called for by proving that you don’t even read the other posts that you are conversing with. What’s the point of even doing this with you?
#2. I supplied you with GGG’s net worth and proof to back the estimated figures. You claimed he was worth less than that but I proved that you’re wrong.
So where would you like to take this? What am I missing here? You’re not showing the ref enough this round so he’s gotta stop the fight. You call me a c”nt for owning you for the 3rd straight issue and that’s equivalent to leaving the ring before the post fight interviews. It’s low class, but low class is an upgrade for your less than stellar history here.
YOU CANNOT FÛCKÎNG READ! YOU ARE ARGUING OVER CERTAIN POINTS THAT I NEVER BOTHERED TO ARGUE WITH!!!
QUOTE MY FÛCKÎNG WORDS IN FUTURE. AS IT’LL PROVE YOU’RE CHALLENGING SOMETHING I’VE ACTUALLY SAID!!!
TWO QUICK REPLIES THOUGH:
TOM LOEFFLER HAD ABSOLUTELY FÛCK ALL TO DO WITH THE SUCCESS THAT VASYL LOMACHENKO AND SERGEY KOVALEV GAINED DURING THEIR CAREERS. DON’T FÛCKÎNG PRETEND THAT YOU CLAIMED OTHERWISE, BECAUSE I CAN QUOTE YOUR FÛCKÎNG HIDEOUSLY MÔRÔNÎC WORDS!!!
ALSO, YOU CITED FÛCKÎNG BÛLLSHÎT FIGURES RELATED TO TERENCE CRAWFORD’S NET WORTH. FOUR FÛCKÎNG FORUM POSTERS DEBUNKED YOUR FÛCKÎNG STUPID CLAIMS!
YOU KEEP AGRESSIVELY CITING GGG’S NET WEALTH, BUT I’VE NEVER COMMENTED ON IT. SO WHO THE FÛCK ARE YOU ARGUING WITH? DON’T QUOTE THESE FIGURES TO ME EVER AGAIN, BECAUSE I’M NOT FÛCKÎNG INTERESTED, SINCE YOU’RE CLEARLY DEBATING WITH A FIGMENT OF YOUR IMAGINATION!!!
FINALLY, LEARN TO FÛCKÎNG READ YOU THICK TWÀT! YOU IGNORE WHAT PEOPLE SAY AND START ARGUING AGAINST THINGS THAT NOBODY FÛCKÎNG MENTIONED!
IF YOU THINK I’M WRONG ABOUT THIS, THEN QUOTE MY FÛCKÎNG WORDS, YOU ILLITERATE TWÀT!
Here’s the typical post of a poor loser. No wonder you don’t have a broad. Lol. I feel for you man. Just say that you’ve been beaten yet again and maybe people wouldn’t hate everything about you. Lol. What an absolute zero you are. Lolololololololololol. Never answered to anything and just made poo up. Ur sad. Don’t comment on my poo anymore. You’ve been handed your lunch consistently every time you have. It’s not in your best interest dick.
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑05 Jan 2019, 23:01
YOU CANNOT FÛCKÎNG READ! YOU ARE ARGUING OVER CERTAIN POINTS THAT I NEVER BOTHERED TO ARGUE WITH!!!
QUOTE MY FÛCKÎNG WORDS IN FUTURE. AS IT’LL PROVE YOU’RE CHALLENGING SOMETHING I’VE ACTUALLY SAID!!!
TWO QUICK REPLIES THOUGH:
TOM LOEFFLER HAD ABSOLUTELY FÛCK ALL TO DO WITH THE SUCCESS THAT VASYL LOMACHENKO AND SERGEY KOVALEV GAINED DURING THEIR CAREERS. DON’T FÛCKÎNG PRETEND THAT YOU CLAIMED OTHERWISE, BECAUSE I CAN QUOTE YOUR FÛCKÎNG HIDEOUSLY MÔRÔNÎC WORDS!!!
ALSO, YOU CITED FÛCKÎNG BÛLLSHÎT FIGURES RELATED TO TERENCE CRAWFORD’S NET WORTH. FOUR FÛCKÎNG FORUM POSTERS DEBUNKED YOUR FÛCKÎNG STUPID CLAIMS!
YOU KEEP AGRESSIVELY CITING GGG’S NET WEALTH, BUT I’VE NEVER COMMENTED ON IT. SO WHO THE FÛCK ARE YOU ARGUING WITH? DON’T QUOTE THESE FIGURES TO ME EVER AGAIN, BECAUSE I’M NOT FÛCKÎNG INTERESTED, SINCE YOU’RE CLEARLY DEBATING WITH A FIGMENT OF YOUR IMAGINATION!!!
FINALLY, LEARN TO FÛCKÎNG READ YOU THICK TWÀT! YOU IGNORE WHAT PEOPLE SAY AND START ARGUING AGAINST THINGS THAT NOBODY FÛCKÎNG MENTIONED!
IF YOU THINK I’M WRONG ABOUT THIS, THEN QUOTE MY FÛCKÎNG WORDS, YOU ILLITERATE TWÀT!
Here’s the typical post of a poor loser. No wonder you don’t have a broad. Lol. I feel for you man. Just say that you’ve been beaten yet again and maybe people wouldn’t hate everything about you. Lol. What an absolute zero you are. Lolololololololololol. Never answered to anything and just made poo up. Ur sad. Don’t comment on my poo anymore. You’ve been handed your lunch consistently every time you have. It’s not in your best interest dick.
Lighten up, Caldo.
Nah. Don’t feel like it.
This dick makes no sense. He bitched about GGG’s career and Loeffler when the kids sitting pretty with a net worth in the 25-30m range. Like his career was so mismanaged by Loeffler.
Meanwhile, Crawford’s only 4 years younger and his net worth is estimated anywhere between 3-7m. But his career has been so well developed.
EO is a moron and so are you for keeping your hand in his jock every post. Be a man.
Here’s the typical post of a poor loser. No wonder you don’t have a broad. Lol. I feel for you man. Just say that you’ve been beaten yet again and maybe people wouldn’t hate everything about you. Lol. What an absolute zero you are. Lolololololololololol. Never answered to anything and just made poo up. Ur sad. Don’t comment on my poo anymore. You’ve been handed your lunch consistently every time you have. It’s not in your best interest dick.
Lighten up, Caldo.
Nah. Don’t feel like it.
This dick makes no sense. He bitched about GGG’s career and Loeffler when the kids sitting pretty with a net worth in the 25-30m range. Like his career was so mismanaged by Loeffler.
Meanwhile, Crawford’s only 4 years younger and his net worth is estimated anywhere between 3-7m. But his career has been so well developed.
EO is a moron and so are you for keeping your hand in his jock every post. Be a man.
oogiebe wrote: ↑06 Jan 2019, 20:21
Lighten up, Caldo.
Nah. Don’t feel like it.
This dick makes no sense. He bitched about GGG’s career and Loeffler when the kids sitting pretty with a net worth in the 25-30m range. Like his career was so mismanaged by Loeffler.
Meanwhile, Crawford’s only 4 years younger and his net worth is estimated anywhere between 3-7m. But his career has been so well developed.
EO is a moron and so are you for keeping your hand in his jock every post. Be a man.
Simply put, you're a child.
Oh so jarring. Please take it back. Idiots. All of you. Especially you.
This dick makes no sense. He bitched about GGG’s career and Loeffler when the kids sitting pretty with a net worth in the 25-30m range. Like his career was so mismanaged by Loeffler.
Meanwhile, Crawford’s only 4 years younger and his net worth is estimated anywhere between 3-7m. But his career has been so well developed.
EO is a moron and so are you for keeping your hand in his jock every post. Be a man.
Simply put, you're a child.
Oh so jarring. Please take it back. Idiots. All of you. Especially you.
Interesting tweets and I think I’ve read a third one from Loeffler criticising another journalist.
What’s interesting though, is that Loeffler hasn’t denied the split nor has he denied the fact that GGG was talking to the networks without his involvement.
It’s also strange to see Loeffler remaining quiet about his inability to fulfill his commitment for GGG to sign with a network before the end of 2018.
Perhaps these journalists really are spreading misinformation, but Loeffler hasn’t done anything to undermine their claims.
It’s a strange situation, because if GGG is negotiating his own network deals then what is Loeffler’s role? Only time will tell I guess.
Last edited by Enlightened-One on 08 Jan 2019, 17:15, edited 1 time in total.
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑08 Jan 2019, 17:21
Dan Rafael’s counter to Tom Loeffler’s angry attack:
Who the fûck knows what the truth really is?
Your right Loeffler has had nothing to do with GGGs great career. Meanwhile in other news he shuts up the biggest blowhard in Boxing over his fake news.
No, you’re right dude. He’s had nothing to do with his success you shiiit heel. How many times can you be wrong!!!!!!!!!!!! Find a new sport EO, you’ve been toasted here way too often numbskull.
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑08 Jan 2019, 17:21
Dan Rafael’s counter to Tom Loeffler’s angry attack:
Who the fûck knows what the truth really is?
Your right Loeffler has had nothing to do with GGGs great career. Meanwhile in other news he shuts up the biggest blowhard in Boxing over his fake news.
No, you’re right dude. He’s had nothing to do with his success you shiiit heel. How many times can you be wrong!!!!!!!!!!!! Find a new sport EO, you’ve been toasted here way too often numbskull.
EO is clueless. From his armchair he "cloaks his own opinions in a veneer of bullshit while pretending that he's in fact impartial."
User Datsue described very well this type of attention seeker-troll like E.O :
" Intelligent or not, he's a complete disingenuous arsehole who cloaks his own opinions in a veneer of bullshit while pretending that he's in fact impartial.
Yet watch him when it's someone he doesn't have a gaping wide-on for in the dock...!
It's like listening to one of those right-wing media types who thinks that saying the word "fact" can simply make inconvenient things that they don't like go away, & that if they keep thrashing things out in a long-winded convoluted fashion you'll lose sight of consensus reality & accept their Byzantine version of events that—despite their constant appeals to some sort of "objectivity"—is only supported by their opinions & their bullshit rhetoric. "
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑08 Jan 2019, 17:21
Dan Rafael’s counter to Tom Loeffler’s angry attack:
Who the fûck knows what the truth really is?
Your right Loeffler has had nothing to do with GGGs great career. Meanwhile in other news he shuts up the biggest blowhard in Boxing over his fake news.
No, you’re right dude. He’s had nothing to do with his success you shiiit heel. How many times can you be wrong!!!!!!!!!!!! Find a new sport EO, you’ve been toasted here way too often numbskull.
EO is clueless. From his armchair he "cloaks his own opinions in a veneer of bullshit while pretending that he's in fact impartial."
User Datsue described very well this type of attention seeker-troll like E.O :
" Intelligent or not, he's a complete disingenuous arsehole who cloaks his own opinions in a veneer of bullshit while pretending that he's in fact impartial.
Yet watch him when it's someone he doesn't have a gaping wide-on for in the dock...!
It's like listening to one of those right-wing media types who thinks that saying the word "fact" can simply make inconvenient things that they don't like go away, & that if they keep thrashing things out in a long-winded convoluted fashion you'll lose sight of consensus reality & accept their Byzantine version of events that—despite their constant appeals to some sort of "objectivity"—is only supported by their opinions & their bullshit rhetoric. "
It couldn’t be said any better. One thing that I’d love to add about this goon EO is what someone called him yesterday. Forgive me for not giving proper credit to the author but this poster called EO’s ridiculous posting position as pedantic. I had to look it up but the definition couldn’t be more perfect way to describe this idiot.
The greatest word ever. Pedantic. Absolutely love it. I’ve called 7 people this today that didn’t deserve it but I just had to use it
Your right Loeffler has had nothing to do with GGGs great career. Meanwhile in other news he shuts up the biggest blowhard in Boxing over his fake news.
No, you’re right dude. He’s had nothing to do with his success you shiiit heel. How many times can you be wrong!!!!!!!!!!!! Find a new sport EO, you’ve been toasted here way too often numbskull.
EO is clueless. From his armchair he "cloaks his own opinions in a veneer of bullshit while pretending that he's in fact impartial."
User Datsue described very well this type of attention seeker-troll like E.O :
" Intelligent or not, he's a complete disingenuous arsehole who cloaks his own opinions in a veneer of bullshit while pretending that he's in fact impartial.
Yet watch him when it's someone he doesn't have a gaping wide-on for in the dock...!
It's like listening to one of those right-wing media types who thinks that saying the word "fact" can simply make inconvenient things that they don't like go away, & that if they keep thrashing things out in a long-winded convoluted fashion you'll lose sight of consensus reality & accept their Byzantine version of events that—despite their constant appeals to some sort of "objectivity"—is only supported by their opinions & their bullshit rhetoric. "
It couldn’t be said any better. One thing that I’d love to add about this goon EO is what someone called him yesterday. Forgive me for not giving proper credit to the author but this poster called EO’s ridiculous posting position as pedantic. I had to look it up but the definition couldn’t be more perfect way to describe this idiot.
The greatest word ever. Pedantic. Absolutely love it. I’ve called 7 people this today that didn’t deserve it but I just had to use it
What is somehow funny or sad is that EO will probably post a long boring reply of his own 'objective' Byzantine version of 'facts'. lol He is probably writing it on word atm. lol
EO is clueless. From his armchair he "cloaks his own opinions in a veneer of bullshit while pretending that he's in fact impartial."
User Datsue described very well this type of attention seeker-troll like E.O :
" Intelligent or not, he's a complete disingenuous arsehole who cloaks his own opinions in a veneer of bullshit while pretending that he's in fact impartial.
Yet watch him when it's someone he doesn't have a gaping wide-on for in the dock...!
It's like listening to one of those right-wing media types who thinks that saying the word "fact" can simply make inconvenient things that they don't like go away, & that if they keep thrashing things out in a long-winded convoluted fashion you'll lose sight of consensus reality & accept their Byzantine version of events that—despite their constant appeals to some sort of "objectivity"—is only supported by their opinions & their bullshit rhetoric. "
It couldn’t be said any better. One thing that I’d love to add about this goon EO is what someone called him yesterday. Forgive me for not giving proper credit to the author but this poster called EO’s ridiculous posting position as pedantic. I had to look it up but the definition couldn’t be more perfect way to describe this idiot.
The greatest word ever. Pedantic. Absolutely love it. I’ve called 7 people this today that didn’t deserve it but I just had to use it
What is somehow funny or sad is that EO will probably post a long boring reply of his own 'objective' Byzantine version of 'facts'. lol He is probably writing it on word atm. lol
Oh yeah. 90% of it will be cut and pasted from a website that has nothing to do with anything. Lol. Remember the good old days when the Russian Children didn’t have the internet in Their villages? This site was great back then.
It couldn’t be said any better. One thing that I’d love to add about this goon EO is what someone called him yesterday. Forgive me for not giving proper credit to the author but this poster called EO’s ridiculous posting position as pedantic. I had to look it up but the definition couldn’t be more perfect way to describe this idiot.
The greatest word ever. Pedantic. Absolutely love it. I’ve called 7 people this today that didn’t deserve it but I just had to use it
What is somehow funny or sad is that EO will probably post a long boring reply of his own 'objective' Byzantine version of 'facts'. lol He is probably writing it on word atm. lol
Oh yeah. 90% of it will be cut and pasted from a website that has nothing to do with anything. Lol. Remember the good old days when the Russian Children didn’t have the internet in Their villages? This site was great back then.
true
He's gonna fire from all cylinders like an old rusty locomotive. Imagine how pissed he is that he pretty much toasted himself with his own 'valid facts' posted from some tweets. lol
Your right Loeffler has had nothing to do with GGGs great career. Meanwhile in other news he shuts up the biggest blowhard in Boxing over his fake news.
No, you’re right dude. He’s had nothing to do with his success you shiiit heel. How many times can you be wrong!!!!!!!!!!!! Find a new sport EO, you’ve been toasted here way too often numbskull.
EO is clueless. From his armchair he "cloaks his own opinions in a veneer of bullshit while pretending that he's in fact impartial."
User Datsue described very well this type of attention seeker-troll like E.O :
" Intelligent or not, he's a complete disingenuous arsehole who cloaks his own opinions in a veneer of bullshit while pretending that he's in fact impartial.
Yet watch him when it's someone he doesn't have a gaping wide-on for in the dock...!
It's like listening to one of those right-wing media types who thinks that saying the word "fact" can simply make inconvenient things that they don't like go away, & that if they keep thrashing things out in a long-winded convoluted fashion you'll lose sight of consensus reality & accept their Byzantine version of events that—despite their constant appeals to some sort of "objectivity"—is only supported by their opinions & their bullshit rhetoric. "
It couldn’t be said any better. One thing that I’d love to add about this goon EO is what someone called him yesterday. Forgive me for not giving proper credit to the author but this poster called EO’s ridiculous posting position as pedantic. I had to look it up but the definition couldn’t be more perfect way to describe this idiot.
The greatest word ever. Pedantic. Absolutely love it. I’ve called 7 people this today that didn’t deserve it but I just had to use it
EO's condition can be called Pedantic only when he takes his meds. Most of the time, he shows clear signs of OCD.
EO is clueless. From his armchair he "cloaks his own opinions in a veneer of bullshit while pretending that he's in fact impartial."
User Datsue described very well this type of attention seeker-troll like E.O :
" Intelligent or not, he's a complete disingenuous arsehole who cloaks his own opinions in a veneer of bullshit while pretending that he's in fact impartial.
Yet watch him when it's someone he doesn't have a gaping wide-on for in the dock...!
It's like listening to one of those right-wing media types who thinks that saying the word "fact" can simply make inconvenient things that they don't like go away, & that if they keep thrashing things out in a long-winded convoluted fashion you'll lose sight of consensus reality & accept their Byzantine version of events that—despite their constant appeals to some sort of "objectivity"—is only supported by their opinions & their bullshit rhetoric. "
It couldn’t be said any better. One thing that I’d love to add about this goon EO is what someone called him yesterday. Forgive me for not giving proper credit to the author but this poster called EO’s ridiculous posting position as pedantic. I had to look it up but the definition couldn’t be more perfect way to describe this idiot.
The greatest word ever. Pedantic. Absolutely love it. I’ve called 7 people this today that didn’t deserve it but I just had to use it
EO's condition can be called Pedantic only when he takes his meds. Most of the time, he shows clear signs of OCD.
EO’s still sore that he didn’t have any nominations for Poster of The Year. Lol. I’m sure that he’s going to throw my prediction in my face at some point- when I predicted that Stiverne would beat Wilder in rematch. Lol. It was a close fight for first 6 seconds and u know it
EO is clueless. From his armchair he "cloaks his own opinions in a veneer of bullshit while pretending that he's in fact impartial."
User Datsue described very well this type of attention seeker-troll like E.O :
" Intelligent or not, he's a complete disingenuous arsehole who cloaks his own opinions in a veneer of bullshit while pretending that he's in fact impartial.
Yet watch him when it's someone he doesn't have a gaping wide-on for in the dock...!
It's like listening to one of those right-wing media types who thinks that saying the word "fact" can simply make inconvenient things that they don't like go away, & that if they keep thrashing things out in a long-winded convoluted fashion you'll lose sight of consensus reality & accept their Byzantine version of events that—despite their constant appeals to some sort of "objectivity"—is only supported by their opinions & their bullshit rhetoric. "
It couldn’t be said any better. One thing that I’d love to add about this goon EO is what someone called him yesterday. Forgive me for not giving proper credit to the author but this poster called EO’s ridiculous posting position as pedantic. I had to look it up but the definition couldn’t be more perfect way to describe this idiot.
The greatest word ever. Pedantic. Absolutely love it. I’ve called 7 people this today that didn’t deserve it but I just had to use it
EO's condition can be called Pedantic only when he takes his meds. Most of the time, he shows clear signs of OCD.
It couldn’t be said any better. One thing that I’d love to add about this goon EO is what someone called him yesterday. Forgive me for not giving proper credit to the author but this poster called EO’s ridiculous posting position as pedantic. I had to look it up but the definition couldn’t be more perfect way to describe this idiot.
The greatest word ever. Pedantic. Absolutely love it. I’ve called 7 people this today that didn’t deserve it but I just had to use it
EO's condition can be called Pedantic only when he takes his meds. Most of the time, he shows clear signs of OCD.
EO’s still sore that he didn’t have any nominations for Poster of The Year. Lol. I’m sure that he’s going to throw my prediction in my face at some point- when I predicted that Stiverne would beat Wilder in rematch. Lol. It was a close fight for first 6 seconds and u know it
It couldn’t be said any better. One thing that I’d love to add about this goon EO is what someone called him yesterday. Forgive me for not giving proper credit to the author but this poster called EO’s ridiculous posting position as pedantic. I had to look it up but the definition couldn’t be more perfect way to describe this idiot.
The greatest word ever. Pedantic. Absolutely love it. I’ve called 7 people this today that didn’t deserve it but I just had to use it
EO's condition can be called Pedantic only when he takes his meds. Most of the time, he shows clear signs of OCD.
EO’s still sore that he didn’t have any nominations for Poster of The Year. Lol. I’m sure that he’s going to throw my prediction in my face at some point- when I predicted that Stiverne would beat Wilder in rematch. Lol. It was a close fight for first 6 seconds and u know it
I laughed way to hard at the last sentence. That was great
