AJ's next fight?
Re: AJ's next fight?
Too much mmm'ing and ahhh'ing 


-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: AJ's next fight?
Surely would make sense to ...get Pulev out the way and remove the IBF mandatory for later in the year...
Re: AJ's next fight?
It's funny, my first reaction was 'why bother' but really what else is there with Fury/Wilder tied up with one another. We know about Whyte & Breazeale & Povetkin & Parker (all previous AJ victims); not much about Miller; Ortiz is fighting Hammer; That really leaves only Pulev or Miller from the top 10.Boxing Prospect wrote: ↑23 Jan 2019, 17:32 Surely would make sense to ...get Pulev out the way and remove the IBF mandatory for later in the year...
Re: AJ's next fight?
No it doesn't.Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑23 Jan 2019, 15:46Eh? Of course boxing works like that.ewenhay wrote: ↑23 Jan 2019, 15:11Yeah but boxing doesn't work like that.coneye wrote: ↑23 Jan 2019, 06:03 I'm definetly not a AJ nuthugger ,, but it does seem to me , there all using his name and profile to get themselves a name and profile of his back .
Start with AJ - Wilder , how many times does AJ have to tell them if they want it they got it , at 60-40 , now since when does Wilder deserve more than that , he had one defining fight , got through on the skin of his teeth , then took o a big out of shape not fought for 2 years Fury , he lost in most peoples eyes , and lets have it right only took the fight because he thought Fury would be a easy fight , fast forward , he needs to do it again and redeem himself , but will he , they spoke at lenght how easy it was to make the first fight , but it seems the second fight is'nt so easy , Wilder all of a sudden wants the bigger purse and home town advantage AGAIN . Does Wilder really want the rematch , i'm not so sure
AJ - FURY ,,, well this one should be easier to make , a 60-40 split to AJ , is a very fair offer , a couple of years ago Tyson could'nt sell bugger all , after the Wilder fight he's more marketable and , worth 60-40 but lets have it right he's the challenger not the holder of belts , get 60-40 have a go at the belts , and then he can go offer 75-25 to challengers and still not make the same money has 60-40 with AJ will make .
Whyte , now here is a joke , he says he's being offered chump change , what the fook , he'll make more than he's ever made at even 75-25 , or 70-30 , whats he done , beat a ordinary not even trained Brown , couple of wins over the gatekeeper Chisora , win over a viking looking for a payday , , not excatly set the world on fire opponents , but thinks he's worth equal billing and 60-40 splits ,
Its really got me stuffed with these guys they don't want to be the champ undisputed , they want the champ money , win or lose , . If i was Hearn i would cut Whyte loose let him see if another promoter is willing to put him on PPV against a good opponent oRTIZ , pOLETVKIN , OR EVEN mILLER , , then let Fury - Wilder battle it out and see the losers stock go down , then over them a crack at the champ for 60-25 ,, Me thinks there all out smarting themselves with greed , but failing to remember AJ HAS THE BELTS
Each fight is a separate proposition with its own value. What someone has earned before has nothing to do with it.
You can't defend capping someone's wages for a huge title fight because they've never earned that much before in non title fights.
It's a totally different situation.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32953
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: AJ's next fight?
It’s not capping someone’s wages though, it’s just reflecting true market value (in fact, it’s actually generous in terms of true market value).ewenhay wrote: ↑23 Jan 2019, 18:09No it doesn't.
You can't defend capping someone's wages for a huge title fight because they've never earned that much before in non title fights.
It's a totally different situation.