Kovalev Charged With Felony Assault, Allegedly Punched Woman

[oogiebe]

..Kovalev has been charged with assault with a deadly weapon...I wonder what kind? was this deadly weapon necessary? ..did the police qualify his fists as deadly?...anyway, I heard nothing over the last 6 months, I guess I'll survive for the next couple of months till the trial comes and we'll hopefully find out what exactly happened or didn't happen...

Yeah, being a pro boxer, his hands are considered deadly/lethal weapons.

..not in a legal sense or is it?

Yes, in a legal sense.

[greg]

Yeah, being a pro boxer, his hands are considered deadly/lethal weapons.

..not in a legal sense or is it?

Yes, in a legal sense.

I honesly didn' realise that..

[oogiebe]

..not in a legal sense or is it?

Yes, in a legal sense.

I honesly didn' realise that..

Even if not a boxer, Hands, feet, teeth, can all be considered deadly weapons. The way in which they are intended to be used plays a part in all of this, but if an item is used in a manner to cause serious bodily injury, then it can be a deadly weapon. The answer to this question would be based on local statutes, which I am unfamiliar with. It was in Big Bear, Calf. His charges are assault by means of force likely to cause great bodily injury, which is punishable by up to four years in prison. Didn't see a weapons charge.

[greg]

Yes, in a legal sense.

I honesly didn' realise that..

Even if not a boxer, Hands, feet, teeth, can all be considered deadly weapons. The way in which they are intended to be used plays a part in all of this, but if an item is used in a manner to cause serious bodily injury, then it can be a deadly weapon. The answer to this question would be based on local statutes, which I am unfamiliar with. It was in Big Bear, Calf. His charges are assault by means of force likely to cause great bodily injury, which is punishable by up to four years in prison. Didn't see a weapons charge.

..that's what shocked me...I thought why would he need any weapon..thanks for clearing it up

[oogiebe]

I honesly didn' realise that..

Even if not a boxer, Hands, feet, teeth, can all be considered deadly weapons. The way in which they are intended to be used plays a part in all of this, but if an item is used in a manner to cause serious bodily injury, then it can be a deadly weapon. The answer to this question would be based on local statutes, which I am unfamiliar with. It was in Big Bear, Calf. His charges are assault by means of force likely to cause great bodily injury, which is punishable by up to four years in prison. Didn't see a weapons charge.

..that's what shocked me...I thought why would he need any weapon..thanks for clearing it up

I looked it up to be sure.

[Ruthless-RKO]

By TMZ Sports

The woman who claims she was attacked by former world champion Sergey Kovalev has now filed a lawsuit against the Russian fighter ... claiming the 35-year-old also attacked her dog.

It's all in court docs obtained by TMZ ... Jamie Frontz (who has identified herself publicly) claims she met Sergey at the grand opening of a boxing gym in Big Bear, CA back in June.

Frontz -- a model and actress -- claims Sergey and a friend followed her home from the party and Kovalev aggressively tried to have sex with her.

"At one point, Kovalev pinned Jamie to the couch, leaning over her with his hands on either side of her shoulders, such that she could not move away."

Jamie claims her dog sensed the danger and tried to intervene -- but Kovalev shoved the dog away and then kicked it in the chest.

While tending to her dog, Jamie claims, "Kovalev turned to [her] and punched her with full force directly in the face one time with a closed fist."

In her suit, Jamie claims Sergey fled the scene -- so, she called the cops.

TMZ broke the story ... cops tracked down Kovalev and arrested him. He's been charged with felony assault and faces up to 4 years in prison. Kovalev has pleaded not guilty.

In her suit, Jamie claims she went to the emergency room where she was treated for a broken nose, head injuries and a concussion. She also claims to have suffered severe back and neck injuries.

The next morning, Jamie claims she saw Kovalev crawl out of the bushes near her cabin, and he yelled her name -- so, she called 911 and later got a restraining order against him.

Jamie is suing for more than $3 million in damages.

We reached out to Kovalev for comment -- so far, no word back.

Sergey is due back in court in March to face the criminal charge. He's also set to fight WBO champion Eleider Alvarez this Saturday, in a rematch of an August bout that he shockingly lost by knockout.

Frontz took to social media, and took aim at Kovalev - who denies her claims.

"I hear that he is denying on his social media that he punched me in the face. I’m curious as to how he explains the fact that I suddenly wound up with a shattered nose, an open head wound, a concussion and two spinal injuries when he was standing 3 feet away from me in the living room of my own cabin (infuriated because I wouldn’t have sex with him, so much so that he had just viciously kicked my dog Annie)," Frontz stated.

"And there’s an eyewitness who saw the whole thing. Nice try, Krusher. Fortunately, he’s facing felony assault charges and I’m also suing him for $8 million, so one way or the other I suspect the truth will come out. Sadly, I know all to well what its like to get punched in the face by Kovalev, only when he hit me he wasn’t wearing gloves."

[Enlightened-One]

Sergey Kovalev has acknowledged the existence of the allegation on his Instagram page. Kathy Duva has conceded that this matter will go to trial. The Police have also confirmed of Kovalev’s arrest and that he has since posted bail. The alleged victim also claims that there’s an eyewitness who saw the incident itself.

It’s only right to assume innocence until guilt has been proven, but I suspect that this matter will quietly go away, via some sort of expensive out-of-court settlement.

That being said, I can’t imagine that prosecutors would be willing to take Sergey to court without possessing some sort of compelling argument that is substantiated with evidence. Of course, this doesn’t necessarily mean that Kovalev is guilty, but obviously “something” happened and there seems to be some sort of proof that implicates the Krusher, otherwise things wouldn’t have progressed as far as they have done.

I’d be interested in seeing how things play out by the end of March. What’s the likelihood of Kovalev gaining revenge over Alvarez this weekend, retaining the loyalty of his family (regardless as to whether he's found guilty or innocent of assult) and also successfully proving his innocence over Jamie Frontz’s allegations?

[caldo2025]

Sergey Kovalev has acknowledged the existence of the allegation on his Instagram page. Kathy Duva has conceded that this matter will go to trial. The Police have also confirmed of Kovalev’s arrest and that he has since posted bail. The alleged victim also claims that there’s an eyewitness who saw the incident itself.

It’s only right to assume innocence until guilt has been proven, but I suspect that this matter will quietly go away, via some sort of expensive out-of-court settlement.

That being said, I can’t imagine that prosecutors would be willing to take Sergey to court without possessing some sort of compelling argument that is substantiated with evidence. Of course, this doesn’t necessarily mean that Kovalev is guilty, but obviously “something” happened and there seems to be some sort of proof that implicates the Krusher, otherwise things wouldn’t have progressed as far as they have done.

I’d be interested in seeing how things play out by the end of March. What’s the likelihood of Kovalev gaining revenge over Alvarez this weekend, retaining the loyalty of his family (regardless as to whether he's found guilty or innocent of assult) and also successfully proving his innocence over Jamie Frontz’s allegations?

Once again, there’s EO taking the side of the batterer. Not the woman or the eyewitness who saw the incident. You’re s dick.

[Enlightened-One]

Sergey Kovalev has acknowledged the existence of the allegation on his Instagram page. Kathy Duva has conceded that this matter will go to trial. The Police have also confirmed of Kovalev’s arrest and that he has since posted bail. The alleged victim also claims that there’s an eyewitness who saw the incident itself.

It’s only right to assume innocence until guilt has been proven, but I suspect that this matter will quietly go away, via some sort of expensive out-of-court settlement.

That being said, I can’t imagine that prosecutors would be willing to take Sergey to court without possessing some sort of compelling argument that is substantiated with evidence. Of course, this doesn’t necessarily mean that Kovalev is guilty, but obviously “something” happened and there seems to be some sort of proof that implicates the Krusher, otherwise things wouldn’t have progressed as far as they have done.

I’d be interested in seeing how things play out by the end of March. What’s the likelihood of Kovalev gaining revenge over Alvarez this weekend, retaining the loyalty of his family (regardless as to whether he's found guilty or innocent of assult) and also successfully proving his innocence over Jamie Frontz’s allegations?

Once again, there’s EO taking the side of the batterer. Not the woman or the eyewitness who saw the incident. You’re s dick.

I’m not taking the side of anyone. None of us possess enough information to draw a reasonable conclusion at this point in time.

According to the law in all countries, as well as international human rights, everyone has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty. And I am simply choosing to adhere to that principle.

Also, I am open to the idea that Sergey Kovalev is indeed possibly guilty of the alleged crime.

Similarly, I am also willing to consider that the alleged victim could simply be another opportunistic vulture seeking to exploit an opportunity to gain instant wealth by capitalising on a situation involving an innocent celebrity multi-millionaire.

No one knows enough information about the situation itself, the alleged victim or what the so-called eyewitness actually saw. We should not assume anything at this point until the details of the March court hearing are known.

If you think I’ve automatically taken the side of Sergey Kovalev in relation to this matter, then please quote my words or alternatively learn how to read and then shut the fṹck up!

[caldo2025]

Sergey Kovalev has acknowledged the existence of the allegation on his Instagram page. Kathy Duva has conceded that this matter will go to trial. The Police have also confirmed of Kovalev’s arrest and that he has since posted bail. The alleged victim also claims that there’s an eyewitness who saw the incident itself.

It’s only right to assume innocence until guilt has been proven, but I suspect that this matter will quietly go away, via some sort of expensive out-of-court settlement.

That being said, I can’t imagine that prosecutors would be willing to take Sergey to court without possessing some sort of compelling argument that is substantiated with evidence. Of course, this doesn’t necessarily mean that Kovalev is guilty, but obviously “something” happened and there seems to be some sort of proof that implicates the Krusher, otherwise things wouldn’t have progressed as far as they have done.

I’d be interested in seeing how things play out by the end of March. What’s the likelihood of Kovalev gaining revenge over Alvarez this weekend, retaining the loyalty of his family (regardless as to whether he's found guilty or innocent of assult) and also successfully proving his innocence over Jamie Frontz’s allegations?

Once again, there’s EO taking the side of the batterer. Not the woman or the eyewitness who saw the incident. You’re s dick.

I’m not taking the side of anyone. None of us possess enough information to draw a reasonable conclusion at this point in time.

According to the law in all countries, as well as international human rights, everyone has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty. And I am simply choosing to adhere to that principle.

Also, I am open to the idea that Sergey Kovalev is indeed possibly guilty of the alleged crime.

Similarly, I am also willing to consider that the alleged victim could simply be another opportunistic vulture seeking to exploit an opportunity to gain instant wealth by capitalising on a situation involving an innocent celebrity multi-millionaire.

No one knows enough information about the situation itself, the alleged victim or what the so-called eyewitness actually saw. We should not assume anything at this point until the details of the March court hearing are known.

If you think I’ve automatically taken the side of Sergey Kovalev in relation to this matter, then please quote my words or alternatively learn how to read and then shut the fṹck up!

Lmaooooooo. You are such a dope. Really. You even write that Duva says it’s going to court but you, in your all knowing behind the scenes says that it will probably be settled out of court because why? Because most women accusing men of these things are after money? Then why dick? Why would you take that stance. You are too stupid to even realize what you are. That’s the worst kind of stupid. Congrats, you’re the worst kind of stupid. That’s the only compliment you’ll ever get from me.

[Enlightened-One]

Once again, there’s EO taking the side of the batterer. Not the woman or the eyewitness who saw the incident. You’re s dick.

I’m not taking the side of anyone. None of us possess enough information to draw a reasonable conclusion at this point in time.

According to the law in all countries, as well as international human rights, everyone has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty. And I am simply choosing to adhere to that principle.

Also, I am open to the idea that Sergey Kovalev is indeed possibly guilty of the alleged crime.

Similarly, I am also willing to consider that the alleged victim could simply be another opportunistic vulture seeking to exploit an opportunity to gain instant wealth by capitalising on a situation involving an innocent celebrity multi-millionaire.

No one knows enough information about the situation itself, the alleged victim or what the so-called eyewitness actually saw. We should not assume anything at this point until the details of the March court hearing are known.

If you think I’ve automatically taken the side of Sergey Kovalev in relation to this matter, then please quote my words or alternatively learn how to read and then shut the fṹck up!

Lmaooooooo. You are such a dope. Really. You even write that Duva says it’s going to court but you, in your all knowing behind the scenes says that it will probably be settled out of court because why? Because most women accusing men of these things are after money? Then why dick? Why would you take that stance. You are too stupid to even realize what you are. That’s the worst kind of stupid. Congrats, you’re the worst kind of stupid. That’s the only compliment you’ll ever get from me.

Are you illiterate, lacking mental capacity or suffering from a combination of both ailments, since it seems that you’re either unable to read or cannot comprehend simple pieces of information?

I’m not mocking you, because you have my upmost sympathy if you really do suffer from some sort of unfortunate affliction that adversely affects your ability to read words and also understand their meaning.

Kathy Duva told ESPN that Kovalev is likely to go to court. This wasn’t an opinion. It was a statement of fact.

I have not taken the side of anyone. You’d know this if you could read.

It’s kind of interesting to see you criticise me for claims I haven’t made, whilst flatly-refusing to quote my actual words. That kind of proves that you either illiterate or a lying cṹnt!

[caldo2025]

I’m not taking the side of anyone. None of us possess enough information to draw a reasonable conclusion at this point in time.

According to the law in all countries, as well as international human rights, everyone has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty. And I am simply choosing to adhere to that principle.

Also, I am open to the idea that Sergey Kovalev is indeed possibly guilty of the alleged crime.

Similarly, I am also willing to consider that the alleged victim could simply be another opportunistic vulture seeking to exploit an opportunity to gain instant wealth by capitalising on a situation involving an innocent celebrity multi-millionaire.

No one knows enough information about the situation itself, the alleged victim or what the so-called eyewitness actually saw. We should not assume anything at this point until the details of the March court hearing are known.

If you think I’ve automatically taken the side of Sergey Kovalev in relation to this matter, then please quote my words or alternatively learn how to read and then shut the fṹck up!

Lmaooooooo. You are such a dope. Really. You even write that Duva says it’s going to court but you, in your all knowing behind the scenes says that it will probably be settled out of court because why? Because most women accusing men of these things are after money? Then why dick? Why would you take that stance. You are too stupid to even realize what you are. That’s the worst kind of stupid. Congrats, you’re the worst kind of stupid. That’s the only compliment you’ll ever get from me.

Are you illiterate, lacking mental capacity or suffering from a combination of both ailments, since it seems that you’re either unable to read or cannot comprehend simple pieces of information?

I’m not mocking you, because you have my upmost sympathy if you really do suffer from some sort of unfortunate affliction that adversely affects your ability to read words and also understand their meaning.

Kathy Duva told ESPN that Kovalev is likely to go to court. This wasn’t an opinion. It was a statement of fact.

I have not taken the side of anyone. You’d know this if you could read.

It’s kind of interesting to see you criticise me for claims I haven’t made, whilst flatly-refusing to quote my actual words. That kind of proves that you either illiterate or a lying cṹnt!

LOL. YOU ARE A SOCIOPATH. GET SOME HELP DUDE.

[caldo2025]

Here’s EO’s breakdown between Kovalev and the woman accusing Kovalev of the crime. Who’s side do you think EO is on?

Also, I am open to the idea that Sergey Kovalev is indeed possibly guilty of the alleged crime.

Similarly, I am also willing to consider that the alleged victim could simply be another opportunistic vulture seeking to exploit an opportunity to gain instant wealth by capitalising on a situation involving an innocent celebrity multi-millionaire.

Look at the description he applies to the woman, the victim. Nothing negative to the accused who has a history of demeaning attitudes towards women. EO, you are a joke. Claim whatever you want to but your comments tell us all that we need to know.

[Counter-puncher]

Here’s EO’s breakdown between Kovalev and the woman accusing Kovalev of the crime. Who’s side do you think EO is on?

Also, I am open to the idea that Sergey Kovalev is indeed possibly guilty of the alleged crime.

Similarly, I am also willing to consider that the alleged victim could simply be another opportunistic vulture seeking to exploit an opportunity to gain instant wealth by capitalising on a situation involving an innocent celebrity multi-millionaire.

Look at the description he applies to the woman, the victim. Nothing negative to the accused who has a history of demeaning attitudes towards women. EO, you are a joke. Claim whatever you want to but your comments tell us all that we need to know.

classic EO, just look at all the redundant excessive words there to try and emphasise his point...except this time he's doing it by accident whilst as usual pretending objectivity

[Counter-puncher]

EO:

"I am totally openminded here

I am totally considering both options here, totally objective.

i have totally contemplated that it could be that Kovalev may be guilty here.

and i have also contemplated that this might be some gold-digging bitch acting like the opportunistic vulture she is, totally trying to rinse Kovalev and seeking to exploit an opportunity to gain instant wealth by capitalising on a situation involving an innocent celebrity multi-millionaire."

lulwhut, you don't think I'm objective about this case involving a gold-digging exploitative bitch?

[Enlightened-One]

Here’s EO’s breakdown between Kovalev and the woman accusing Kovalev of the crime. Who’s side do you think EO is on?

Also, I am open to the idea that Sergey Kovalev is indeed possibly guilty of the alleged crime.

Similarly, I am also willing to consider that the alleged victim could simply be another opportunistic vulture seeking to exploit an opportunity to gain instant wealth by capitalising on a situation involving an innocent celebrity multi-millionaire.

Look at the description he applies to the woman, the victim. Nothing negative to the accused who has a history of demeaning attitudes towards women. EO, you are a joke. Claim whatever you want to but your comments tell us all that we need to know.

classic EO, just look at all the redundant excessive words there to try and emphasise his point...except this time he's doing it by accident whilst as usual pretending objectivity

You guys must be fṹckḯng morons! I don’t know what else to say! I’m speechless about how mind-bogglingly stupid you guys are!

I’m actually laughing at some of the made-up stupid fṹckḯng shḯt you’ve written!

[Counter-puncher]

I’m actually laughing at some of the made-up stupid fṹckḯng shḯt you’ve written!

Also, I am open to the idea that Sergey Kovalev is indeed possibly guilty of the alleged crime.

Similarly, I am also willing to consider that the alleged victim could simply be another opportunistic vulture seeking to exploit an opportunity to gain instant wealth by capitalising on a situation involving an innocent celebrity multi-millionaire.

so kids- would you say EO potentially favours one of these arguments?

which one?

the first one, where he says K is 'possibly guilty of the alleged crime' (he qualifies 'crime' twice, once with 'possibly' then with 'alleged')

or the second, where he uses more than twice as many words, note also he repeats himself (as usual when he is hamfistedly trying to make one of his biased cases), 'vulture' isn't enough for EO here he has to use 'opportunistic vulture', similarly 'opportunistic vulture' isn't enough, he then has to repeat himself with the irrelevant/redundant 'exploit an opportunity to gain instant wealth', and the doubly-redundant 'capitalising on a situation involving an innocent celebrity multi-millionaire' (he's now said the same thing three times basically) note also he again qualifies Kovalev's status 'innocent celebrity multi-millionaire' w/r/t potential guilt, whereas the only qualifier he uses regarding the victim is 'alleged victim' -he seeks to qualify Kovalev's guilt in a way he doesn't with the 'victim's victimhood.

and he's too fvcking dumb to see how obviously his language use exposes his bias.

one sentence, 18 words

one sentence, 38 words

which argument do you think EO favours, kids?

[jamamb]

lol after 8 million?

does that not seem totally over the top

[caldo2025]

EO loses again. How many times do I have to take him to the toolshed? That’s like 5 in a row.

[Enlightened-One]

I’m actually laughing at some of the made-up stupid fṹckḯng shḯt you’ve written!

and he's too fvcking dumb to see how obviously his language use exposes his bias.

one sentence, 18 words

one sentence, 38 words

which argument do you think EO favours, kids?

OMFG! You seriously think that a word-count illustrates bias!

Oh FFS! This is far too funny! Keep it up guys, as you’ve made me laugh a few times today already! I’m waiting for another punchline.

[jamamb]

well, i wonder if the self identifying , model and actress will get her 8 mill from the evil krusher

maybe she could get a new nose with it

[dickbelden]

https://tech2.org/russia/sergey-kovalev ... h-mma-ufc/

[Counter-puncher]

I’m actually laughing at some of the made-up stupid fṹckḯng shḯt you’ve written!

and he's too fvcking dumb to see how obviously his language use exposes his bias.

one sentence, 18 words

one sentence, 38 words

which argument do you think EO favours, kids?

OMFG! You seriously think that a word-count illustrates bias!

Oh FFS! This is far too funny! Keep it up guys, as you’ve made me laugh a few times today already! I’m waiting for another punchline.

you're the punchline you dumb fvck, we're discovering new wirnkles to your personality disorders every day

[tiny_acres]

I’m actually laughing at some of the made-up stupid fṹckḯng shḯt you’ve written!

and he's too fvcking dumb to see how obviously his language use exposes his bias.

one sentence, 18 words

one sentence, 38 words

which argument do you think EO favours, kids?

OMFG! You seriously think that a word-count illustrates bias!

Oh FFS! This is far too funny! Keep it up guys, as you’ve made me laugh a few times today already! I’m waiting for another punchline.

Actually from a psychological standpoint. The terms used and the over the top wording of alleged victim, clearly show a bias.
Either subconsciously or not

[greg]

https://tech2.org/russia/sergey-kovalev ... h-mma-ufc/

is that her?
http://prettypinkacres.com/

hell, I don't need a trial, I believe her right away ..