Canelo Allowed To Hold Both WBA Belts, Per New Order

caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Canelo Allowed To Hold Both WBA Belts, Per New Order

Post by caldo2025 »

Here’s what we’ll do. I’ll put a poll out there and we’ll see what the public thinks. You think that judges have no vested interest in Floyd or Canelo. I think that they do. Let the results speak for the winner and loser. I’ll submit to you if people think like you.
verlichte
Super Lightweight
Posts: 400
Joined: 18 Apr 2017, 18:42

Re: Canelo Allowed To Hold Both WBA Belts, Per New Order

Post by verlichte »

caldo2025 wrote: 09 Feb 2019, 00:16
verlichte wrote: 08 Feb 2019, 19:26 The following claim below is blatantly untrue and it seems you’ve finally conceded your error:
caldo2025 wrote: 08 Feb 2019, 11:45PAC and Oscar never came close to bringing in the money to Vegas that Floyd and Canelo now does. It’s not even close.
I’m not going to debate Mayweather’s financial success in Nevada, so I won’t engage in your attempts to steer the conversation away from Canelo.

That being said, I have reminded you several times about one of your other inaccurate claims, which relates to your belief that Floyd Mayweather Jr. simply needed to go the distance in order to win fights.

This myth has already been successfully debunked, but you seemingly prefer to avoid defending this claim. Why is that?

Why do you need to move the goalposts?
As you wiggle away from Floyd, the majority of my point and cling on to the weakest part of my claims to stay in the game.

HOW IN THE WORLD DID YOU DEBUNK WHAT I SAID? Floyd is undefeated you dope and has had plenty of scorecards that has people scratching their heads. I gave you a clear example in Maidana 1 so what’s your point ? You have a little EO in you ya know? No matter how well I trounce your garbage, you just keep repeated the same dumb points.

I showed you an example of how Floyd just needed to finish to get the win in Maidana 1. Maidana outlanded him in 7-5 rounds. Maidana threw double the amount of punches Floyd did in the fight and had Floyd pinned against the ropes for most of it. For Moretti and Clements to have 116-112 and 117-111 is not only obscene, it’s impossible. To only award Maidana 3 and 4 winning rounds respectively in that fight? It should have lost both clowns judging licenses.

And I did point out that Floyd hasn’t needed this kind of help that Canelo needs because Floyd was just that good most nights. I’ve watched 3 fights that Canelo already lost and I had Trout scoring a draw in another. The greatest boxing minds on the earth agree GGG was clearly robbed in the first one and 85% of writers ringside for second also had GGG winning the second. 10% had draw. So what aren’t you getting here?

So don’t twist things and Be EO. There’s way more credible evidence supporting my points than anything you’ve said here. So let’s see if you actually read my reply this time before just spitting out same old crap.

Let me ask you this ok loudmouth know it-all good good for nothing jerk? Who is Boxing’s top dog and top money earner now and for years to come? Come on you can say it.
Provide evidence of Mayweather being reliant on biased scoring from the judges.

Marcos Maidana never deserved to beat Mayweather, so you need to do far better than that! Provide another example.

Provide evidence of Canelo generating much more revenue in Nevada than De La Hoya and Pacquiao.

It’s clear that you can do neither, hence the reason for your frustration.

And that’s not my fault. I’m not the one who made outlandish unsubstantiated claims. That’s on you, :TU:
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: Canelo Allowed To Hold Both WBA Belts, Per New Order

Post by apollo creed »

Off course he's allowed. He's the money-ginger. :OhYes:
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: Canelo Allowed To Hold Both WBA Belts, Per New Order

Post by apollo creed »

verlichte wrote: 09 Feb 2019, 04:24
caldo2025 wrote: 09 Feb 2019, 00:16
verlichte wrote: 08 Feb 2019, 19:26 The following claim below is blatantly untrue and it seems you’ve finally conceded your error:
caldo2025 wrote: 08 Feb 2019, 11:45PAC and Oscar never came close to bringing in the money to Vegas that Floyd and Canelo now does. It’s not even close.
I’m not going to debate Mayweather’s financial success in Nevada, so I won’t engage in your attempts to steer the conversation away from Canelo.

That being said, I have reminded you several times about one of your other inaccurate claims, which relates to your belief that Floyd Mayweather Jr. simply needed to go the distance in order to win fights.

This myth has already been successfully debunked, but you seemingly prefer to avoid defending this claim. Why is that?

Why do you need to move the goalposts?
As you wiggle away from Floyd, the majority of my point and cling on to the weakest part of my claims to stay in the game.

HOW IN THE WORLD DID YOU DEBUNK WHAT I SAID? Floyd is undefeated you dope and has had plenty of scorecards that has people scratching their heads. I gave you a clear example in Maidana 1 so what’s your point ? You have a little EO in you ya know? No matter how well I trounce your garbage, you just keep repeated the same dumb points.

I showed you an example of how Floyd just needed to finish to get the win in Maidana 1. Maidana outlanded him in 7-5 rounds. Maidana threw double the amount of punches Floyd did in the fight and had Floyd pinned against the ropes for most of it. For Moretti and Clements to have 116-112 and 117-111 is not only obscene, it’s impossible. To only award Maidana 3 and 4 winning rounds respectively in that fight? It should have lost both clowns judging licenses.

And I did point out that Floyd hasn’t needed this kind of help that Canelo needs because Floyd was just that good most nights. I’ve watched 3 fights that Canelo already lost and I had Trout scoring a draw in another. The greatest boxing minds on the earth agree GGG was clearly robbed in the first one and 85% of writers ringside for second also had GGG winning the second. 10% had draw. So what aren’t you getting here?

So don’t twist things and Be EO. There’s way more credible evidence supporting my points than anything you’ve said here. So let’s see if you actually read my reply this time before just spitting out same old crap.

Let me ask you this ok loudmouth know it-all good good for nothing jerk? Who is Boxing’s top dog and top money earner now and for years to come? Come on you can say it.
Provide evidence of Mayweather being reliant on biased scoring from the judges.

Marcos Maidana never deserved to beat Mayweather, so you need to do far better than that! Provide another example.

Provide evidence of Canelo generating much more revenue in Nevada than De La Hoya and Pacquiao.

It’s clear that you can do neither, hence the reason for your frustration.

And that’s not my fault. I’m not the one who made outlandish unsubstantiated claims. That’s on you, :TU:
Another EO's alt ? lol
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Canelo Allowed To Hold Both WBA Belts, Per New Order

Post by caldo2025 »

apollo creed wrote: 09 Feb 2019, 09:34
verlichte wrote: 09 Feb 2019, 04:24
caldo2025 wrote: 09 Feb 2019, 00:16
verlichte wrote: 08 Feb 2019, 19:26 The following claim below is blatantly untrue and it seems you’ve finally conceded your error:
caldo2025 wrote: 08 Feb 2019, 11:45PAC and Oscar never came close to bringing in the money to Vegas that Floyd and Canelo now does. It’s not even close.
I’m not going to debate Mayweather’s financial success in Nevada, so I won’t engage in your attempts to steer the conversation away from Canelo.

That being said, I have reminded you several times about one of your other inaccurate claims, which relates to your belief that Floyd Mayweather Jr. simply needed to go the distance in order to win fights.

This myth has already been successfully debunked, but you seemingly prefer to avoid defending this claim. Why is that?

Why do you need to move the goalposts?
As you wiggle away from Floyd, the majority of my point and cling on to the weakest part of my claims to stay in the game.

HOW IN THE WORLD DID YOU DEBUNK WHAT I SAID? Floyd is undefeated you dope and has had plenty of scorecards that has people scratching their heads. I gave you a clear example in Maidana 1 so what’s your point ? You have a little EO in you ya know? No matter how well I trounce your garbage, you just keep repeated the same dumb points.

I showed you an example of how Floyd just needed to finish to get the win in Maidana 1. Maidana outlanded him in 7-5 rounds. Maidana threw double the amount of punches Floyd did in the fight and had Floyd pinned against the ropes for most of it. For Moretti and Clements to have 116-112 and 117-111 is not only obscene, it’s impossible. To only award Maidana 3 and 4 winning rounds respectively in that fight? It should have lost both clowns judging licenses.

And I did point out that Floyd hasn’t needed this kind of help that Canelo needs because Floyd was just that good most nights. I’ve watched 3 fights that Canelo already lost and I had Trout scoring a draw in another. The greatest boxing minds on the earth agree GGG was clearly robbed in the first one and 85% of writers ringside for second also had GGG winning the second. 10% had draw. So what aren’t you getting here?

So don’t twist things and Be EO. There’s way more credible evidence supporting my points than anything you’ve said here. So let’s see if you actually read my reply this time before just spitting out same old crap.

Let me ask you this ok loudmouth know it-all good good for nothing jerk? Who is Boxing’s top dog and top money earner now and for years to come? Come on you can say it.
Provide evidence of Mayweather being reliant on biased scoring from the judges.

Marcos Maidana never deserved to beat Mayweather, so you need to do far better than that! Provide another example.

Provide evidence of Canelo generating much more revenue in Nevada than De La Hoya and Pacquiao.

It’s clear that you can do neither, hence the reason for your frustration.

And that’s not my fault. I’m not the one who made outlandish unsubstantiated claims. That’s on you, :TU:
Another EO's alt ? lol
Oh it’s Def EO. There’s no way there can be two of these walking the earth.

Hey guys, no more opinions ok? It’s now a court so please cut and paste proof for anything you feel and cite your sources or your opinion will not be heard. Mingia!
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: Canelo Allowed To Hold Both WBA Belts, Per New Order

Post by apollo creed »

caldo2025 wrote: 09 Feb 2019, 10:15
apollo creed wrote: 09 Feb 2019, 09:34
verlichte wrote: 09 Feb 2019, 04:24
caldo2025 wrote: 09 Feb 2019, 00:16
verlichte wrote: 08 Feb 2019, 19:26 The following claim below is blatantly untrue and it seems you’ve finally conceded your error:
caldo2025 wrote: 08 Feb 2019, 11:45PAC and Oscar never came close to bringing in the money to Vegas that Floyd and Canelo now does. It’s not even close.
I’m not going to debate Mayweather’s financial success in Nevada, so I won’t engage in your attempts to steer the conversation away from Canelo.

That being said, I have reminded you several times about one of your other inaccurate claims, which relates to your belief that Floyd Mayweather Jr. simply needed to go the distance in order to win fights.

This myth has already been successfully debunked, but you seemingly prefer to avoid defending this claim. Why is that?

Why do you need to move the goalposts?
As you wiggle away from Floyd, the majority of my point and cling on to the weakest part of my claims to stay in the game.

HOW IN THE WORLD DID YOU DEBUNK WHAT I SAID? Floyd is undefeated you dope and has had plenty of scorecards that has people scratching their heads. I gave you a clear example in Maidana 1 so what’s your point ? You have a little EO in you ya know? No matter how well I trounce your garbage, you just keep repeated the same dumb points.

I showed you an example of how Floyd just needed to finish to get the win in Maidana 1. Maidana outlanded him in 7-5 rounds. Maidana threw double the amount of punches Floyd did in the fight and had Floyd pinned against the ropes for most of it. For Moretti and Clements to have 116-112 and 117-111 is not only obscene, it’s impossible. To only award Maidana 3 and 4 winning rounds respectively in that fight? It should have lost both clowns judging licenses.

And I did point out that Floyd hasn’t needed this kind of help that Canelo needs because Floyd was just that good most nights. I’ve watched 3 fights that Canelo already lost and I had Trout scoring a draw in another. The greatest boxing minds on the earth agree GGG was clearly robbed in the first one and 85% of writers ringside for second also had GGG winning the second. 10% had draw. So what aren’t you getting here?

So don’t twist things and Be EO. There’s way more credible evidence supporting my points than anything you’ve said here. So let’s see if you actually read my reply this time before just spitting out same old crap.

Let me ask you this ok loudmouth know it-all good good for nothing jerk? Who is Boxing’s top dog and top money earner now and for years to come? Come on you can say it.
Provide evidence of Mayweather being reliant on biased scoring from the judges.

Marcos Maidana never deserved to beat Mayweather, so you need to do far better than that! Provide another example.

Provide evidence of Canelo generating much more revenue in Nevada than De La Hoya and Pacquiao.

It’s clear that you can do neither, hence the reason for your frustration.

And that’s not my fault. I’m not the one who made outlandish unsubstantiated claims. That’s on you, :TU:
Another EO's alt ? lol
Oh it’s Def EO. There’s no way there can be two of these walking the earth.

Hey guys, no more opinions ok? It’s now a court so please cut and paste proof for anything you feel and cite your sources or your opinion will not be heard. Mingia!
or 'valid ' :lol:
:TU:

EO is probably tired and annoyed to get ridiculed and mocked on this forum so he resorted to one of his alts to spread his 'valid points'. lol
Post Reply