I'm going through my collection scoring fights that had controversial decisions and came up with following:
Hagler-Antuofermo I - 145-140 Hagler - Poor, poor decision
Ali-Young - 144-142 Ali - Young could have won if his offence was half as effective as his defence.
Any opinions guys?
Controversial Decisions
The Ali Vs Young fight was very close -
As were all the Ali Vs Norton fights-
Some others off the top of my head...
Fenech Vs Azumah I (Fenech clearly won that fight).
P. Whitaker Vs ODLH (I had the older Whitaker up by 2 or 3pts)
Both Holyfield Vs Lewis fights - I had Lewis winning the first fight and Holyfield clearly winning the second -
Sugar Ray Vs Hearns II - Hearns clearly deserved this one as well -
As were all the Ali Vs Norton fights-
Some others off the top of my head...
Fenech Vs Azumah I (Fenech clearly won that fight).
P. Whitaker Vs ODLH (I had the older Whitaker up by 2 or 3pts)
Both Holyfield Vs Lewis fights - I had Lewis winning the first fight and Holyfield clearly winning the second -
Sugar Ray Vs Hearns II - Hearns clearly deserved this one as well -
Last edited by meade95 on 17 May 2006, 14:48, edited 3 times in total.
-
THE DANCING MASTER
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 96
- Joined: 02 Jan 2004, 15:31