Groves removed and then reinstated on itv coverage
-
Monte Fisto
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36
Re: Groves removed and then reinstated on itv coverage
I’m a big fan of groves but I think he could have been kinder to degale overall on the night. He really couldn’t hold back his delight for the pasting degale got. I guess completely honest, but Froch would have got dogs abuse for being that happy for a groves beat down.
I watched an interview where Groves mentioned he had a vested interest, almost as if it was in Eubank. Can anyone clarify what he meant? Have I missed something?
I watched an interview where Groves mentioned he had a vested interest, almost as if it was in Eubank. Can anyone clarify what he meant? Have I missed something?
Re: Groves removed and then reinstated on itv coverage
Groves & Degale is a great British rivalry that'll be looked on more fondly as times passes. It's a shame they never got it on again 3 years ago while both in their prime to see how that panned out. Personally, I think Groves would always have Degales number.
Groves was asking Jnr for his phone number yesterday, Snr said "DM me"![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Groves was asking Jnr for his phone number yesterday, Snr said "DM me"
Re: Groves removed and then reinstated on itv coverage
I thought the coverage was really good last night. Calmer (if occasionally off at a tangent) commentary than Sky, good analysis from Groves and especially from Duke McKenzie and best of all.. no adverts on a PPV event, which should be a given. They did a good job, hope they carry on. Wonder what the viewing figures were,
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Groves removed and then reinstated on itv coverage
How much was it anyway ? i saw it in the cinema for £11.50.revporl wrote: ↑24 Feb 2019, 09:03 I thought the coverage was really good last night. Calmer (if occasionally off at a tangent) commentary than Sky, good analysis from Groves and especially from Duke McKenzie and best of all.. no adverts on a PPV event, which should be a given. They did a good job, hope they carry on. Wonder what the viewing figures were,
Re: Groves removed and then reinstated on itv coverage
£20bigjack wrote: ↑24 Feb 2019, 10:37How much was it anyway ? i saw it in the cinema for £11.50.revporl wrote: ↑24 Feb 2019, 09:03 I thought the coverage was really good last night. Calmer (if occasionally off at a tangent) commentary than Sky, good analysis from Groves and especially from Duke McKenzie and best of all.. no adverts on a PPV event, which should be a given. They did a good job, hope they carry on. Wonder what the viewing figures were,
-
leejonesjnr
- Middleweight
- Posts: 2667
- Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32
Re: Groves removed and then reinstated on itv coverage
If it’s the interview I saw he doesn’t say vested interest he says ‘obviously I’m biased’ just meaning that he doesn’t like James DeGale95gerog wrote: ↑24 Feb 2019, 08:11 I’m a big fan of groves but I think he could have been kinder to degale overall on the night. He really couldn’t hold back his delight for the pasting degale got. I guess completely honest, but Froch would have got dogs abuse for being that happy for a groves beat down.
I watched an interview where Groves mentioned he had a vested interest, almost as if it was in Eubank. Can anyone clarify what he meant? Have I missed something?
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23113
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Groves removed and then reinstated on itv coverage
He means in legacy. He beat James twice and Eubank jr so that’s the end of any argument.
-
TheLeprechaun
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5171
- Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42
Re: Groves removed and then reinstated on itv coverage
I think With Groves and Degale it's clearly a genuine long held dislike. A lot of history there and they genuinely dislike each other.95gerog wrote: ↑24 Feb 2019, 08:11 I’m a big fan of groves but I think he could have been kinder to degale overall on the night. He really couldn’t hold back his delight for the pasting degale got. I guess completely honest, but Froch would have got dogs abuse for being that happy for a groves beat down.
I watched an interview where Groves mentioned he had a vested interest, almost as if it was in Eubank. Can anyone clarify what he meant? Have I missed something?
With Frochs dislike of Groves, you just get the impression he's being a pr*ck. You don't really get any impression that groves actually dislikes Froch either. With Groves and Degale, there is genuine dislike. I think their dislike for each other is up there in terms of british boxing history.
And Groves was a bit pissed as the night wore on. Definitely had a few pints and was hammered giving the IFL interview at the end.
Re: Groves removed and then reinstated on itv coverage
Groves had a few shandy’s on the night and looked like all round he just had a good time really
And there is genuine needle between the two
Anyone know what groves said to degales mother,I did ask samwbr but he never got back
And there is genuine needle between the two
Anyone know what groves said to degales mother,I did ask samwbr but he never got back
Re: Groves removed and then reinstated on itv coverage
-
dr_devious
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5349
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19
Re: Groves removed and then reinstated on itv coverage
Double standards that Froch gets pulled to pieces about his barbed comments about Groves whereas Groves himself gets a pass doing the same about De Gale. Groves is just more intelligant and articulate than Froch and De Gale so should probably know better.