lillywhite14 wrote: ↑22 Mar 2019, 13:41Fury should be aiming for the WBC. Without that he’s looking at mandatory money against Joshua. A mandatory position does him little favour in negotiations for that one.
tiny_acres wrote: ↑22 Mar 2019, 17:11Exactly. Im jind of shocked EO would even think this is dound reasoning.
Fury has been offered 40% already. None of the organization's will demand more than that at purse bid
tiny_acres wrote: ↑22 Mar 2019, 13:33The last thing Team Fury want a is a mandatory purse bid.
I think I’ve already provided this explanation on a different thread, but I’ll repeat myself once more to clarify the point I’m making…
Tyson Fury signed a deal worth $103.5m with ESPN, which will inevitably contain numerous contractual stipulations.
It’s merely speculation on my part, but it’s unimaginable to think that the contractual terms of this deal wouldn’t contain some sort of reference to the conditions ESPN would offer/dictate should they televise a bout between Fury and Joshua. It might be in the form of an additional bonus (separate from the purse) for Tyson to take the fight, or the $103.5 already contains some sort of upfront payment to account for this eventuality.
Either way, ESPN wouldn’t have offered a deal worth $103.5m to Tyson Fury without discussing the possibility of what would happen in the scenario of cross-platform cross-promotion fights against the likes of Wilder and Joshua.
So here’s what I’m thinking…
Top Rank are clearly attempting to manoeuvre the Brit into achieving mandatory challenger status with the WBO in order to force the purse bid, potentially allowing ESPN to win the rights to televise a potential Joshua-Fury super-fight.
Bob Arum has a very cosy relationship with the WBO. And I’m pretty sure that ESPN and Top Rank have already found a way to compensate Tyson Fury for having to accept the WBO's typical 25% mandatory challenger purse split, with Joshua receiving the remainder.
It’s a win-win situation for them if AJ refuses to participate in the purse bid and vacates the WBO championship.
I’m coming from the angle of what the boxing content providers want rather than the fighters purse split demands, since the networks have already compensated their boxers with nine-digit deals.
I’m kind of shocked you guys think that ESPN have paid Tyson Fury a deal worth $103.5m to continuously face opponents such as Tom Schwarz.
