Ali was beaten at his peak article!

Rocky Balboa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1851
Joined: 24 Jan 2004, 16:38

Ali was beaten at his peak article!

Post by Rocky Balboa »

22.05.06 - By Graham Berrisford: In discussing the least-regarded (1974) fight between Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier, Frank Lotierzo mentioned in a piece on the "East Side Boxing" web site that nobody beat Ali in his prime. I will argue Ali was beaten in his prime by Frazier. And there is much more to be said about Frazier in comparison with Ali. One remarkable fact to begin with. After Frazier retired, we learnt he was registered blind in one eye before his boxing career started.

For any sport that requires skill and tactics as well as brute strength, an athlete's prime is probably the years from 25 to 31 years old. If you take George Foreman as your example, a heavyweight boxer can come back to regain the world championship in his mid forties. In his early career, Ali never boxed 15 rounds, and his 12 round fights were not as testing as those later against Frazier and Foreman.

Ali was out of the professional boxing ring from 25 to 28, but he was back (Quarry, Oct 1970) ring-tested over 15 rounds (Bonavena Dec 1970) and fully fit well before his first fight with Frazier. If Ali danced a little less in 15-round championship fights on his return, that didn't mean he was past his prime as a boxer, and it probably showed a wiser man, better able to last the longer distance.

Ali (b. January, 1942) was only two years older than Frazier (b. January, 1944). They fought three times. In 1971, both were surely in their prime. In 1974, Frazier's fitness can be questioned. In 1975, they were at the end of their prime, but the fight itself showed their strength and fitness.

The first bout (dubbed "Fight of the Century") took place on March 8, 1971, in New York. Frazier was the heavyweight champion of the world. Ali was the challenger, and this was his first championship fight since being stripped of his title and banned from boxing for refusing to join the military in 1967. Frazier won the fight in a unanimous decision, knocking Ali down in the 15th round.


Frank Lotierzo again: "In the next 33 months, the fighters took different paths. Frazier toured abroad with his singing group "Joe Frazier and The Knockouts". Frazier fought just four times and wasn't anywhere near close to the shape he was in for Ali. In those four fights, Frazier went 3-1 stopping Daniels' and Stander, was stopped by Foreman, and decisioned Bugner. Ali fought 13 times going 12-1 in those fights. His loss was to Ken Norton in March of 1973. Six months later he fought Norton again and won a very close decision. Over those 33 months, Ali's weight fluctuated between 212 and 221. During this time Ali fought all the top contenders and was virtually trying to take away all potential Frazier opponents, in order to force Frazier to fight him again."

Their second and perhap underrated bout Jan. 20, 1974 was a non-title fight; Frazier having lost the championship to George Foreman. Some say Ali won the fight before it started, by winding Frazier up. During appearances on TV, Ali brutalized Frazier verbally. When Frazier tried to talk or make a point, Ali interrupted him and mocked Frazier's diction. When it came to the fight Ali defeated Frazier in a 12-round decision. Later that year, Ali knocked out Foreman in Zaire ("Rumble in the Jungle") winning the heavyweight title for the second time.

The third and final bout ("Thrilla in Manila") was on Oct. 1, 1975 in the Philippines. Both boxers dished out and received heavy punishment. Ali won the fight when Frazier failed to answer the bell for the 15th round. After 14 rounds over which the judges might have found it difficult to declare a winner, Frazier's trainer stopped him from coming out of his corner in the last round, because Frazier's one good eye was swollen to the point of closing. At this point, Ali's legs crumpled from under him and he collapsed to the canvas. Would Ali have lasted the final round?

When they fought, Ali was heavier than Frazier by a handful of pounds. But Ali had big height and reach advantages. Ali was taller than Frazier by 3.5 inches (6'3" - 5'11.5"). And Ali's reach was an astounding 8.5 inches longer than Frazier's (82" to 73.5"). Throughout his career, Ali had been able to damage his opponents with a left jab that exploited his tremendous reach. And with his opponents kept at a long arm's length, Ali could (famously) sway back to avoid a punch. Frank Lotierzo has argued that Larry Holmes, with exceptional reach and jab, could have troubled Ali in his prime. Frazier could not reach Ali with a jab, and had worked with his trainer to invent his own bobbing and weaving style to get close enough.

Ali had more wins (56, 37 knockouts) than Joe (32, 27 knockouts). However, wins against journeymen hardly count. Losses are more informative. Frazier was beaten only by legends: Ali (twice) and Foreman (twice). Foreman was a huge brute of a man, whose physical advantages overhelmed Frazier. Ali was beaten by five opponents including non-legends Norton, Spinks, and Berbick. Ali's rematch win against Norton has been disputed. And when Ali beat Foreman, finally coming off the ropes to land a knock-out blow against an exhausted man, there was a touch of luck about it.

Ali was surely the greatest some ways: an amazing athlete, blessed with tremendous physical attributes and tremendous skill. One has to wonder what Frazier could have done with Ali's height and reach, and two good eyes. And the fact is that Ali was beaten in his prime by Frazier.

What are we to make of the article?
barry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3797
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

re

Post by barry »

Ali wasn't in his prime though! Ali was certainly at the top of his game, but his prime was around 1967. Hell, his bout with Frazier was just his third in four years, which just speaks more highly of how great he really was to be able to stand up to the lion that Frazier was at that time. The Ali of 66' and 67' simply would not have been hit by a lot of the punches that Frazier nailed him with. The Ali of 71' was now taking punches that he would have danced away from a few years earlier. You can't take anything away from Frazier as he fought the best fight of his life, but it was not against Ali in his prime...very close, but not quite!


>>>Ali had more wins (56, 37 knockouts) than Joe (32, 27 knockouts). However, wins against journeymen hardly count.<<<

That line pretty much sums up the worth of the article..."journeymen hardly count!" The writer is probably either a big fan of Frazier, or just someone who really dislikes Ali...probably both.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: re

Post by pundit »

barry wrote:Ali wasn't in his prime though! Ali was certainly at the top of his game, but his prime was around 1967.
For once I agree with Barry.
bigzab
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 129
Joined: 07 Feb 2006, 04:02

Post by bigzab »

"One has to wonder what Frazier could have done with Ali's height and reach".
I Love it.
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: re

Post by The Great John L »

barry wrote:Ali wasn't in his prime though! Ali was certainly at the top of his game, but his prime was around 1967. Hell, his bout with Frazier was just his third in four years, which just speaks more highly of how great he really was to be able to stand up to the lion that Frazier was at that time. The Ali of 66' and 67' simply would not have been hit by a lot of the punches that Frazier nailed him with. The Ali of 71' was now taking punches that he would have danced away from a few years earlier. You can't take anything away from Frazier as he fought the best fight of his life, but it was not against Ali in his prime...very close, but not quite!
Here’s a tough one to debate, because I rate Ali #1 all-time, but Joe had the style to always give Ali trouble. The Ali of 66-67 was hittable, and while he may have shown more movement, Joe’s style would have forced him into a trench fight even in his peak years. If Blin could land shots on him (and he did), then Joe would have been able to batter those ribs even on the 66-67 version of Ali. In fact the Ali that fought Joe the first time had just come off a very tough scrap with Ringo, which may have better prepared him strategically and mentally for the fight of the century. Styles make fights, and Joe had the style to really test anyone without a HUGE punch, regardless of how slick they were. 15 rounds of non-stop pressure is pretty hard to deal with, especially from a guy with a very hard left hook. :TU:
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11172
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Post by Ezzard »

I think Frazier's win is often overlooked and downgraded. Ali was closer to his prime in the 1st fight than Frazier was in the other 2.

I think Ali's prime was amixture of the pre and post prison years.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

Ezzard wrote:I think Frazier's win is often overlooked and downgraded. Ali was closer to his prime in the 1st fight than Frazier was in the other 2.
I don't think so. Ali had been only 5 months active when he fought Frazier with two tune-ups, he lacked fight practice. The post-comback Ali reached his prime in about 1972, I suppose.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11172
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Post by Ezzard »

pundit wrote:
Ezzard wrote:I think Frazier's win is often overlooked and downgraded. Ali was closer to his prime in the 1st fight than Frazier was in the other 2.
I don't think so. Ali had been only 5 months active when he fought Frazier with two tune-ups, he lacked fight practice. The post-comback Ali reached his prime in about 1972, I suppose.
Maybe, but I still feel that Frazier was furtehr past his peak in the other 2 fights.

I also think that Frazier on that night would have ebaten any version of Ali.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Post by dempseyfire »

This article seems to be written by a 5th grader. First off, 3 years off boxing will affect a fighter, and his comeback (including a lucky cuts stoppage over Quarry and struggling vs Bonavena) happened in a span of months. You could argue he was in the 'twilight' of his prime when he fought Joe but certaintly wasn't the same guy who'd faced Folley.

2ndly, Ali DID go 15 rounds in his prime, vs Terrell and Chuvalo. This guy needs to friggin' look at some records before he writes an article

3rdly, Frazier's short height is what made his bobbing and weaving pressure style so effective. Sometimes a fighter can make use of their physical frame, and Frazier did very much ducking low and making opponents tired by missing punches and then being further detoriated by body shots against the ropes. As I said in another thread, if Frazier had been 6'3 he would've been knocked out more and not nearly as effective. This is a very amateur article.

And all that said, and I think Frazier still beats Ali circa 1968 in a close match. But it would've been closer then the 71 match
barry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3797
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

re

Post by barry »

>>>I also think that Frazier on that night would have ebaten any version of Ali.<<<

Maybe...though I have a hard time believing that any version of Frazier could have beaten the Ali who fought Cleveland Williams, which was probably Ali at his very best.
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: re

Post by The Great John L »

barry wrote:>>>I also think that Frazier on that night would have ebaten any version of Ali.<<<

Maybe...though I have a hard time believing that any version of Frazier could have beaten the Ali who fought Cleveland Williams, which was probably Ali at his very best.
Not sure what Ali’s performance against Williams has to do with beating Frazier. Williams and Frazier were two drastically different fighters, both style and ability. Plus Williams was clearly past his prime. Styles make fights and unless Ali somehow learned how to punch like Foreman, I think he would have had a titanic struggle on his hands at any stage of his career.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Ali was beaten at his peak article!

Post by BoxBuzz »

Rocky Balboa wrote:
22.05.06 -

Their second and perhap underrated bout Jan. 20, 1974 was a non-title fight; Frazier having lost the championship to George Foreman. Some say Ali won the fight before it started, by winding Frazier up. During appearances on TV, Ali brutalized Frazier verbally. When Frazier tried to talk or make a point, Ali interrupted him and mocked Frazier's diction. When it came to the fight Ali defeated Frazier in a 12-round decision. Later that year, Ali knocked out Foreman in Zaire ("Rumble in the Jungle") winning the heavyweight title for the second time.



What are we to make of the article?


Here is the heart of the story... it's the only time Ali took it very seriously and he dominated. Both of the other times he thought he won before he stepped in the ring and he almost blew it both times. And I truly don't think Frazier was taken off his game by the antics. Don't get me wrong Frazier would always extract a high price but Ali had his number...just barely.
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Post by KOJOE90 »

Sorry but that article is so full of holes.
Ambling Alp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3627
Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31

Post by Ambling Alp »

I agree, this article has more holes than a golf course. A few are really bad:

In the 3rd fight, Fraziers trainer stopped the fight and Ali's legs crumpled from under him as he fell to the canvas. Would Ali have lasted the final round?
How stupid is that? This implies that Ali fell down and would have stuggled to get up if he had to. It was obvious that he he collapsed only after he knew the fight was over. Ali definetely would have made it through the last round;you could have bet your life on that. It was really more of a question if Frazier would have made it; he was really just target practice the last two rounds.

- Ali won 56 fights and Frazier won 32, but wins over journeyman don't count? This implies that Frazier beat tougher competition.
Again, how stupid can you get? Frazier did win 9 fights against top 10 fighters/champions, which is impressive. However, Ali had 33 wins over fighters who were in the top 10 or the champion!

Frazier only lost to legends Ali (twice) and Foreman (twice). Ali lost to "non legends" Norton, Berbick,and Spinsks. This is true. However it should be pointed out that Ali beat Foreman who beat Frazier twice. The losses to Spinks and Berbick were when he was well past his prime. Norton wasn't a legend but he was a very good fighter. The author conveniently forgets to mention Frazier's draw with Jumbo Cummings when Frazier was way over the hill.

- When Ali beat Foreman, "there was a touch of luck about it". The author doesn't explain what this "touch of luck" involves. Probably because it wasn't luck. Ali knocked Foreman out. It wasn't luck.

- "One has to wonder what Frazier could have done with Ali's height and reach, and two good eyes".
Why not, how good could Ali have been if he had Frazier's left hook? You deal with what natural talent you have been given.
His two good eyes? Huh?

The sad thing is that some people who don't know better will believe this crap that this guy has in his article.
Jaclem
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2492
Joined: 27 Jul 2002, 01:03

Post by Jaclem »

...just for the record...there is a reference here in a post to ali's "prison years." although he was banned from boxing (an outrage) his years in exile were spent mostly in the courts....not in prison. he refusal to be drafted was finally declared legal.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

jaclem....ever the concise historian
surf-bat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 639
Joined: 27 Jan 2006, 19:03

Re: re

Post by surf-bat »

barry wrote:Ali wasn't in his prime though! Ali was certainly at the top of his game, but his prime was around 1967. Hell, his bout with Frazier was just his third in four years, which just speaks more highly of how great he really was to be able to stand up to the lion that Frazier was at that time. The Ali of 66' and 67' simply would not have been hit by a lot of the punches that Frazier nailed him with. The Ali of 71' was now taking punches that he would have danced away from a few years earlier. You can't take anything away from Frazier as he fought the best fight of his life, but it was not against Ali in his prime...very close, but not quite!


>>>Ali had more wins (56, 37 knockouts) than Joe (32, 27 knockouts). However, wins against journeymen hardly count.<<<

That line pretty much sums up the worth of the article..."journeymen hardly count!" The writer is probably either a big fan of Frazier, or just someone who really dislikes Ali...probably both.

Ah, so it IS possible for a writer to be biased, huh? Interesting. Can you apply this logic to your RING postings on the Cerdan/LaMotta thread or is that asking too much?
barry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3797
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

re

Post by barry »

Give it up! Keep your rant about LaMotta-Cerdan to the thread is being debated in because if you continue to take the nonsense to other threads, that have nothing to do with the debate, then I'm just going to delete it!
Graham Brett
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 260
Joined: 24 Feb 2005, 09:24

Re: Ali was beaten at his peak article!

Post by Graham Brett »

Rocky Balboa wrote:
22.05.06 - By Graham Berrisford: In discussing the least-regarded (1974) fight between Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier, Frank Lotierzo mentioned in a piece on the "East Side Boxing" web site that nobody beat Ali in his prime. I will argue Ali was beaten in his prime by Frazier. And there is much more to be said about Frazier in comparison with Ali. One remarkable fact to begin with. After Frazier retired, we learnt he was registered blind in one eye before his boxing career started.

For any sport that requires skill and tactics as well as brute strength, an athlete's prime is probably the years from 25 to 31 years old. If you take George Foreman as your example, a heavyweight boxer can come back to regain the world championship in his mid forties. In his early career, Ali never boxed 15 rounds, and his 12 round fights were not as testing as those later against Frazier and Foreman.

I dont buy all that shit about Ali being past in at just 29.

In 71, Frazier beat a peak ALi, fair and square.

Ali was out of the professional boxing ring from 25 to 28, but he was back (Quarry, Oct 1970) ring-tested over 15 rounds (Bonavena Dec 1970) and fully fit well before his first fight with Frazier. If Ali danced a little less in 15-round championship fights on his return, that didn't mean he was past his prime as a boxer, and it probably showed a wiser man, better able to last the longer distance.

Ali (b. January, 1942) was only two years older than Frazier (b. January, 1944). They fought three times. In 1971, both were surely in their prime. In 1974, Frazier's fitness can be questioned. In 1975, they were at the end of their prime, but the fight itself showed their strength and fitness.

The first bout (dubbed "Fight of the Century") took place on March 8, 1971, in New York. Frazier was the heavyweight champion of the world. Ali was the challenger, and this was his first championship fight since being stripped of his title and banned from boxing for refusing to join the military in 1967. Frazier won the fight in a unanimous decision, knocking Ali down in the 15th round.


Frank Lotierzo again: "In the next 33 months, the fighters took different paths. Frazier toured abroad with his singing group "Joe Frazier and The Knockouts". Frazier fought just four times and wasn't anywhere near close to the shape he was in for Ali. In those four fights, Frazier went 3-1 stopping Daniels' and Stander, was stopped by Foreman, and decisioned Bugner. Ali fought 13 times going 12-1 in those fights. His loss was to Ken Norton in March of 1973. Six months later he fought Norton again and won a very close decision. Over those 33 months, Ali's weight fluctuated between 212 and 221. During this time Ali fought all the top contenders and was virtually trying to take away all potential Frazier opponents, in order to force Frazier to fight him again."

Their second and perhap underrated bout Jan. 20, 1974 was a non-title fight; Frazier having lost the championship to George Foreman. Some say Ali won the fight before it started, by winding Frazier up. During appearances on TV, Ali brutalized Frazier verbally. When Frazier tried to talk or make a point, Ali interrupted him and mocked Frazier's diction. When it came to the fight Ali defeated Frazier in a 12-round decision. Later that year, Ali knocked out Foreman in Zaire ("Rumble in the Jungle") winning the heavyweight title for the second time.

The third and final bout ("Thrilla in Manila") was on Oct. 1, 1975 in the Philippines. Both boxers dished out and received heavy punishment. Ali won the fight when Frazier failed to answer the bell for the 15th round. After 14 rounds over which the judges might have found it difficult to declare a winner, Frazier's trainer stopped him from coming out of his corner in the last round, because Frazier's one good eye was swollen to the point of closing. At this point, Ali's legs crumpled from under him and he collapsed to the canvas. Would Ali have lasted the final round?

When they fought, Ali was heavier than Frazier by a handful of pounds. But Ali had big height and reach advantages. Ali was taller than Frazier by 3.5 inches (6'3" - 5'11.5"). And Ali's reach was an astounding 8.5 inches longer than Frazier's (82" to 73.5"). Throughout his career, Ali had been able to damage his opponents with a left jab that exploited his tremendous reach. And with his opponents kept at a long arm's length, Ali could (famously) sway back to avoid a punch. Frank Lotierzo has argued that Larry Holmes, with exceptional reach and jab, could have troubled Ali in his prime. Frazier could not reach Ali with a jab, and had worked with his trainer to invent his own bobbing and weaving style to get close enough.

Ali had more wins (56, 37 knockouts) than Joe (32, 27 knockouts). However, wins against journeymen hardly count. Losses are more informative. Frazier was beaten only by legends: Ali (twice) and Foreman (twice). Foreman was a huge brute of a man, whose physical advantages overhelmed Frazier. Ali was beaten by five opponents including non-legends Norton, Spinks, and Berbick. Ali's rematch win against Norton has been disputed. And when Ali beat Foreman, finally coming off the ropes to land a knock-out blow against an exhausted man, there was a touch of luck about it.

Ali was surely the greatest some ways: an amazing athlete, blessed with tremendous physical attributes and tremendous skill. One has to wonder what Frazier could have done with Ali's height and reach, and two good eyes. And the fact is that Ali was beaten in his prime by Frazier.

What are we to make of the article?
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

might make a good paper airplane...or emergency toilet paper.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

I wouldn't give this article the pleasure of being used as my toilet paper... totally anti Ali this is, ignores the fact that the Ali who fought Frazier in their first bout was drastically different to the Ali of '67 plus he hadnt yet got used to the loss of his speed and adapted his style to this... Frazier was a all time great himself but he certainly would have had much more trouble with the always moving much faster Ali of the mid-60s to the Ali that he fought... to argue otherwise is just nonsense... Alis main weapon against Frazier in their fights was his speed and the pre-exile Ali was a far faster fighter.... :box:
bill.lockhart
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 249
Joined: 01 Nov 2005, 11:40

Peak Ali

Post by bill.lockhart »

Frazier must be given more credit. Ali was in his prime, but not at his peak. I have always thought Joe winning the first fight was more about him being great ... he was never better... sleek & fiercely dedicated, than anything about Ali. On that night, March 8/71 Joe Frazier was Ali's master. Was their ever a night Ali could have beat that Frazier ? Probably, but it would have been before 1971, for sure, & what a fight that would have been.
KO Artist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1835
Joined: 10 May 2005, 17:21

Post by KO Artist »

silkov wrote:I wouldn't give this article the pleasure of being used as my toilet paper... totally anti Ali this is, ignores the fact that the Ali who fought Frazier in their first bout was drastically different to the Ali of '67 plus he hadnt yet got used to the loss of his speed and adapted his style to this... Frazier was a all time great himself but he certainly would have had much more trouble with the always moving much faster Ali of the mid-60s to the Ali that he fought... to argue otherwise is just nonsense... Alis main weapon against Frazier in their fights was his speed and the pre-exile Ali was a far faster fighter.... :box:
What people fail to realise, is that Frazier was a better fighter PRIOR to 1971. He was much faster in the late 60's and had more snap on his shots.

Frazier beat a prime Clay fair and square. All this talk about Ali being past it is horseshit.

Ali was slightly less mobile but that was because he sat down on his shots more and generated more power.

The older Ali got, the better he fared against Joe.

The Ali of 66-68 simply would not have hurt Joe, and would have been heavily pressured into a points defeat. Joe was very fast himself.

Ali is a great fighter, but way overrated by most. Those who call him the greatest P4P should watch some boxing, cause it is laughable really.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

KO Artist wrote:
silkov wrote:I wouldn't give this article the pleasure of being used as my toilet paper... totally anti Ali this is, ignores the fact that the Ali who fought Frazier in their first bout was drastically different to the Ali of '67 plus he hadnt yet got used to the loss of his speed and adapted his style to this... Frazier was a all time great himself but he certainly would have had much more trouble with the always moving much faster Ali of the mid-60s to the Ali that he fought... to argue otherwise is just nonsense... Alis main weapon against Frazier in their fights was his speed and the pre-exile Ali was a far faster fighter.... :box:
What people fail to realise, is that Frazier was a better fighter PRIOR to 1971. He was much faster in the late 60's and had more snap on his shots.

Frazier beat a prime Clay fair and square. All this talk about Ali being past it is horseshit.

Ali was slightly less mobile but that was because he sat down on his shots more and generated more power.

The older Ali got, the better he fared against Joe.

The Ali of 66-68 simply would not have hurt Joe, and would have been heavily pressured into a points defeat. Joe was very fast himself.

Ali is a great fighter, but way overrated by most. Those who call him the greatest P4P should watch some boxing, cause it is laughable really.
The Ali who disposed of Cleveland Williams in the November of 1966 would have hurt Joe, as he would have hurt any other heavyweight in the world. And he would have avoided Joe's pressure much better than any version of the 1970s Ali.
KO Artist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1835
Joined: 10 May 2005, 17:21

Post by KO Artist »

pundit wrote:
KO Artist wrote:
silkov wrote:I wouldn't give this article the pleasure of being used as my toilet paper... totally anti Ali this is, ignores the fact that the Ali who fought Frazier in their first bout was drastically different to the Ali of '67 plus he hadnt yet got used to the loss of his speed and adapted his style to this... Frazier was a all time great himself but he certainly would have had much more trouble with the always moving much faster Ali of the mid-60s to the Ali that he fought... to argue otherwise is just nonsense... Alis main weapon against Frazier in their fights was his speed and the pre-exile Ali was a far faster fighter.... :box:
What people fail to realise, is that Frazier was a better fighter PRIOR to 1971. He was much faster in the late 60's and had more snap on his shots.

Frazier beat a prime Clay fair and square. All this talk about Ali being past it is horseshit.

Ali was slightly less mobile but that was because he sat down on his shots more and generated more power.

The older Ali got, the better he fared against Joe.

The Ali of 66-68 simply would not have hurt Joe, and would have been heavily pressured into a points defeat. Joe was very fast himself.

Ali is a great fighter, but way overrated by most. Those who call him the greatest P4P should watch some boxing, cause it is laughable really.
The Ali who disposed of Cleveland Williams in the November of 1966 would have hurt Joe, as he would have hurt any other heavyweight in the world. And he would have avoided Joe's pressure much better than any version of the 1970s Ali.
You are kidding, right.

Williams was 8 years past his prime and was half blind and almost a cripple just coming off having half his spleen removed from a shooting.

Please.
Post Reply