Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post Reply

Which replacement would you prefer?

Poll ended at 17 May 2019, 13:29

Luis Ortiz
68
58%
Dillian Whyte
16
14%
Adam Kownacki
3
3%
Manuel Charr
0
No votes
Joe Joyce
5
4%
Michael Hunter
8
7%
Joseph Parker
0
No votes
Dereck Chisora
2
2%
Kubrat Pulev
7
6%
Other (Please post)
8
7%
 
Total votes: 117

black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4089
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by black panther »

If Miller is definitely out of the AJ fight, bearing in mind Wilder & Fury already have fights scheduled, who would you prefer to see opposite Joshua on June 1st?
Last edited by black panther on 17 Apr 2019, 13:57, edited 1 time in total.
Verdi
Welterweight
Posts: 819
Joined: 12 Apr 2016, 18:08

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by Verdi »

Usyk.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4089
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by black panther »

Verdi wrote: 17 Apr 2019, 13:31Usyk.
Nice! But I can’t see it happened I would imagine Hearn wanting to build that fight up.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9404
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by tiny_acres »

Trevor Bryan is one I don't want to see but would not surprise me if it's him.
He's the #1 WBA contender so I'm sure they could eliminate a mandatory with him.
He has no chance in hell of winning so it would be who Hearn would want
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32661
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

What an absolutely garbage selection. The heavyweight division stinks outside of Joshua.
Gnome
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5391
Joined: 13 Nov 2010, 18:54

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by Gnome »

Pulev
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4089
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by black panther »

Gnome wrote: 17 Apr 2019, 13:52Pulev
Cheers. Dave Allen out of poll. pulev In.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by DrDuke »

Pulev has the best chances to provide a counteraction to Joshua, so he's the best option. But can he be ready after a pretty hard fought recent bout?
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32661
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

I initially thought Pulev, but the way Wlad demolished him so easily makes me think AJ would do exactly the same, probably even earlier.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by jamamb »

pulev had a big ass cut, dont know that hed be ready
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4089
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by black panther »

jamamb wrote: 17 Apr 2019, 14:09 pulev had a big ass cut, dont know that hed be ready
Also I would imagine his eligibility to be licensed is under review after the harassment claim/ “kissing” incident.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100745
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Ortiz was first name that AJ said to Hearn.

Hearn is loving that fight..

Apparently, they've sold 17k tickets with 10k being UK fans.. So there is no way they are moving dates. Plus AJ will want to fight and get paid that date.

Hearn said, Ortiz's team might look at this and say it's too short notice.. Knowing Ortiz, he probably jump on it, and it would be his highest payday.

No replacement is going to be getting Miller's actual purse, it will be a reduced amount for sure, but regardless, a high payday.

----

Pulev was guaranteed £4m against Joshua - his replacement Takam took home £755,500 guaranteed, before probably doubling that figure after ppv sales.

Joshua still took home around £18m for that fight though. Obviously late opponent change could have had an impact on ppv sales.
Last edited by Ruthless-RKO on 17 Apr 2019, 14:40, edited 1 time in total.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by jamamb »

ortiz would be good to take, ort is overrated by by many so it would look good for josh to smash him. its the best guy outside fury/wilder who he hasnt already beat.

luis loves the peds himself though, could be another failure!
chinarich
Middleweight
Posts: 6857
Joined: 29 Dec 2013, 13:20

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by chinarich »

It either has to be a big name or an American, or at the very least someone with a big American following. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Kownacki owing to the fact I believe he has a strong following amongst the Polish-American community. Or his team have been trying to build that up.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by Coco »

Usuk
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16398
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 17 Apr 2019, 14:33 Ortiz was first name that AJ said to Hearn.

Hearn is loving that fight..

Apparently, they've sold 17k tickets with 10k being UK fans.. So there is no way they are moving dates. Plus AJ will want to fight and get paid that date.

Hearn said, Ortiz's team might look at this and say it's too short notice.. Knowing Ortiz, he probably jump on it, and it would be his highest payday.

No replacement is going to be getting Miller's actual purse, it will be a reduced amount for sure, but regardless, a high payday.

----

Pulev was guaranteed £4m against Joshua - his replacement Takam took home £755,500 guaranteed, before probably doubling that figure after ppv sales.

Joshua still took home around £18m for that fight though. Obviously late opponent change could have had an impact on ppv sales.
Reduced purse? I seriously doubt it Ortiz or whoever have them by the balls, also with only a few weeks notice they will want to make bank.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100745
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 17 Apr 2019, 15:14 Reduced purse? I seriously doubt it Ortiz or whoever have them by the balls, also with only a few weeks notice they will want to make bank.
Will Definitely not be the full purse. Only difference here is Hearn told Takam to train and be ready in case anything was to happen. Probably already agreed a purse by then as well. 6 weeks isn’t too long nor is it around the corner.

Ortiz was paid $500k vs. Wilder.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26484
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by KiwiRider »

chinarich wrote: 17 Apr 2019, 14:39 It either has to be a big name or an American, or at the very least someone with a big American following. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Kownacki owing to the fact I believe he has a strong following amongst the Polish-American community. Or his team have been trying to build that up.
Kownacki is a bit like Sean Monaghan, does fine in front of the right guys, sells tickets in New York, but will get seriously exposed at any higher level than he is at right now
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by Coco »

Arreola would give it the trash talk, come to fight, and lose spectacularly, take low money too, a low risk fight
chinarich
Middleweight
Posts: 6857
Joined: 29 Dec 2013, 13:20

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by chinarich »

KiwiRider wrote: 17 Apr 2019, 15:44 Kownacki is a bit like Sean Monaghan, does fine in front of the right guys, sells tickets in New York, but will get seriously exposed at any higher level than he is at right now
Oh, I don’t believe he’ll be competitive at all but he fits the bill in terms of being relatively popular where the fight is staged and i wouldn’t be surprised were he chosen.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by bigjack »

Gnome wrote: 17 Apr 2019, 13:52Pulev
:zzz:
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26484
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by KiwiRider »

bigjack wrote: 17 Apr 2019, 16:00:zzz:
He is a mandatory. I mean, what can ya do?
It happens all the time if you want to keep multiple belts there is always a Pulev or a Charr lurking about.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100745
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

KiwiRider wrote: 17 Apr 2019, 15:44 Kownacki is a bit like Sean Monaghan, does fine in front of the right guys, sells tickets in New York, but will get seriously exposed at any higher level than he is at right now
Too bad Monaghan’s retired now.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by tobyh5 »

Once again, it all flips around.

At one stage AJ was stumbling around in the dark desperate for an opponent and him and the team were taking a lot of incoming hits from critics, especially in light of that "proper fighting man" Tyson Fury seemingly on the point of signing to fight Deontay Wilder for the second time.

THEN Fury decided to be an absolute prick and go back on so many of his previous expressed opinions (I don't fight for money, I do not need the money, I am a proper fighting man who will just fight the proper fights, I will fight anyone, I do not need long negotiations as I just want to fight anyone) by then signing to fight someone hardly anyone has heard of and no one respects. Then Wilder had to take care of his mandatory and is facing the known (but not already beaten badly by AJ) Breazeale.

Suddenly they had let AJ off the hook and he was in the best fight out of the top three guys. Now, we have all three facing fights none of really give a shite about.

The flagbearer division is red hot, and everyone is fighting bums. Great. The only fight that I would be interested in would be Ortiz but I doubt the fat ancient fck would get in shape in time,
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16791
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Jarell Miller stand-in: who would you prefer?

Post by skanksta »

Everyone on that list would be an acceptable replacement and watchable fight - except Charr.
Please god not him !
Post Reply