Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Tony1244
Cruiserweight
Posts: 24624
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by Tony1244 »

gilgamesh wrote: 19 Apr 2019, 14:34Nope
Nope that the best woman boxer can't beat a guy 2-17? Or nope that we won't find out?
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46243
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by gilgamesh »

Tony1244 wrote: 19 Apr 2019, 14:36 Nope that the best woman boxer can't beat a guy 2-17? Or nope that we won't find out?
Can't beat the guy.
Tony1244
Cruiserweight
Posts: 24624
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by Tony1244 »

gilgamesh wrote: 19 Apr 2019, 14:37 Can't beat the guy.
I don't believe Shields believes what she's saying but publicity is publicity.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46243
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by gilgamesh »

Tony1244 wrote: 19 Apr 2019, 14:38 I don't believe Shields believes what she's saying but publicity is publicity.
To me even if they did want to make some sort of P.C. point about "Women can do anything men can do" or whatever. How is matching THE BEST Woman athlete in the world against an absolute scrub of a guy proving anything even if she does win? All it proves is that you have to scrape the bottom of the barrel REAL f*cking hard to find a guy bad enough to lose.

If they actually get a guy who's even mildly decent as a fighter, and he gives a sincere effort he will win.

Hell I'm an 0-1 amateur, and I have no doubt in my mind that I could beat Claressa Shields tomorrow.
FruitStealer
Super Featherweight
Posts: 42
Joined: 21 Jul 2018, 04:26

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by FruitStealer »

A female pro bóxer wouldnt event survive a round with an amateur juvenile male bóxer.
sturm vogel
Super Featherweight
Posts: 450
Joined: 03 Mar 2019, 00:20

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by sturm vogel »

Tony1244 wrote: 19 Apr 2019, 08:39 A woman fighting against a man in a ring is one thing. Knowledgable women not being fit to work a corner? Well, you're just being silly.
Must be the estrogen in your baby bottle milk.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by JCS »

It's an interesting question.... I mean Claressa Shields could surely beat Andrew Hartley.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46243
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by gilgamesh »

JCS wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 00:45 It's an interesting question.... I mean Claressa Shields could surely beat Andrew Hartley.
Yeah, but again so could I. You gotta go awful low on the totem pole :lol:
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by JCS »

gilgamesh wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 00:45 Yeah, but again so could I. You gotta go awful low on the totem pole :lol:
Maybe.. but there's still a point where I do believe the best female boxers slot above some male boxers...

Just don't know where it is..
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46243
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by gilgamesh »

JCS wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 00:46 Maybe.. but there's still a point where I do believe the best female boxers slot above some male boxers...

Just don't know where it is..
Somewhere between 1500 and 2000 depending on how many active fighters there are in that respective weight class I'm thinking.

1200 at best.
Tony1244
Cruiserweight
Posts: 24624
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by Tony1244 »

sturm vogel wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 00:38 Must be the estrogen in your baby bottle milk.
Why don't you explain to me why a knowledgable boxing woman shouldn't be able to work a corner if she' has excellent knowledge and is a great motivator?
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2093
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by squiggy »

sturm vogel wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 00:38 Must be the estrogen in your baby bottle milk.
Hey everybody look at me, I'm an asshole.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by oogiebe »

squiggy wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 12:49 Hey everybody look at me, I'm an asshole.
LMFAO!!! :lol:
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by Enlightened-One »

sturm vogel wrote: 18 Apr 2019, 21:57 Women boxers are not fit to work a man's corner let alone stand against him in the ring. That is Hollywood and Socialist fantasy not reality.
Ann Wolfe? :-? She was a decent trainer wasn’t she, as well as being a powerful fundamentally sound fighter also?
Ricky
Super Featherweight
Posts: 13643
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 09:27

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by Ricky »

gilgamesh wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 00:48 Somewhere between 1500 and 2000 depending on how many active fighters there are in that respective weight class I'm thinking.

1200 at best.

There's just no way a women could beat a professional male. Don't underestimate what it takes to be a fully fledged professional. It's like tennis, even the lowest level pro is still better than high level amatuers and would wipe the floor with the elite women.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by SenorPipino »

RKY wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 13:28 There's just no way a women could beat a professional male. Don't underestimate what it takes to be a fully fledged professional. It's like tennis, even the lowest level pro is still better than high level amatuers and would wipe the floor with the elite women.
Serena could wipe the floor with a low ranking pro.

On the court, she's half a man.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by Onetimeonly »

SenorPipino wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 13:43 Serena could wipe the floor with a low ranking pro.

On the court, she's half a man.
A guy ranked over 200 smashed Serena 6-1 ages ago, then he whipped Venus.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by SenorPipino »

Onetimeonly wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 13:47 A guy ranked over 200 smashed Serena 6-1 ages ago, then he whipped Venus.
When was this?
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by Onetimeonly »

SenorPipino wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 13:49 When was this?
Maybe 15 years ago. I never heard of the guy before or after.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by SenorPipino »

Onetimeonly wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 13:52 Maybe 15 years ago. I never heard of the guy before or after.
Was Serena still a kid then?
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by oogiebe »

Enlightened-One wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 13:20 Ann Wolfe? :-? She was a decent trainer wasn’t she, as well as being a powerful fundamentally sound fighter also?
We have very different bodies. I want my trainer to completely understand what's happening to me in that ring. If I get hit low, I want a guy who knows what that feels like to be in my corner, not some woman who tells me to walk it off. It's more than getting direction. The trainer needs to be completely in tune with me during the rounds. Having a different sex in my corner takes away from that.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by Enlightened-One »

oogiebe wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 13:55 We have very different bodies. I want my trainer to completely understand what's happening to me in that ring. If I get hit low, I want a guy who knows what that feels like to be in my corner, not some woman who tells me to walk it off. It's more than getting direction. The trainer needs to be completely in tune with me during the rounds. Having a different sex in my corner takes away from that.
So you’re essentially saying that Ann Wolfe couldn’t possibly train a man, simply because she hasn’t got a pair of bôllôcks?

Do you know anything about Ann Wolfe and have you seen the fighters she’s trained, as well as evaluating her competence at performing such a role?
Last edited by Enlightened-One on 21 Apr 2019, 14:05, edited 1 time in total.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by oogiebe »

Enlightened-One wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 14:03 So you’re essentially saying that Ann Wolfe couldn’t possibly train a man, simply because she hasn’t got a pair of bôllôcks?
Right EO, that's exactly what I posted. :roll:
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by Enlightened-One »

oogiebe wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 14:05 Right EO, that's exactly what I posted. :roll:
Well you did dwell on the fact that a trainer needs to appreciate the sort of pain that results from low blows, so yes, that’s precisely what you said, even if you didn’t mean it that way!

Answer the god damn question I posed and stop avoiding it!
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?

Post by oogiebe »

Enlightened-One wrote: 21 Apr 2019, 14:07 Well you did dwell on the fact that a trainer needs to appreciate the sort of pain that results from low blows, so yes, that’s precisely what you said, even if you didn’t mean it that way!
No it's not. :lol: Did you have a big bowl of stupid this morning? with extra idiocy? Such a troll.
Post Reply