Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - 20 April 2019
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 103248
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 103248
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23113
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - 20 April 2019
I do know Kell and he wanted the fight badly.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 10:06 Sorry mate, I forgot you and Brook are best buds and he told you this.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 103248
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - 20 April 2019
Why should we like him for being a high earner? I paid to watch him last night and he pulled that garbage. McCloskey & Barerra fights ended in farce too.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 10:08 You can call me a little biased. Only because I know him.
Tbh, not excusing last night, but he gets unnecessary hate.
After Joshua, he’s the highest earning BrItish boxer.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 103248
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
-
overhand_right
- Heavyweight

Re: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - 20 April 2019
Can we forget any idea of him ever having been a threat to Floyd Mayweather now? He would have been eating punches and probably panicking in a similar fashion.
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - 20 April 2019
When did we think that anyway?overhand_right wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 12:52 Can we forget any idea of him ever having been a threat to Floyd Mayweather now? He would have been eating punches and probably panicking in a similar fashion.
-
overhand_right
- Heavyweight

Re: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - 20 April 2019
Not this poster! Khan always seemed to me to be an "almost great" fighter.overhand_right wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 12:59 Lots of people gave him a chance on here over the years, 'but Khan's handspeed blah blah blah'
-
Switch hitter
- Middleweight
- Posts: 590
- Joined: 09 Aug 2014, 07:43
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - 20 April 2019
Not best buds...... but known him a hell of a long time...... mateRuthless-RKO wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 10:06 Sorry mate, I forgot you and Brook are best buds and he told you this.
Last edited by Switch hitter on 21 Apr 2019, 15:07, edited 1 time in total.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - 20 April 2019
While it was a soft ending Khan had won every minute of every round. The Irishman was never going to win.ShadrachSimmo wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:10 Correct. I remember Barry Hearn was fckin raging with the ref after McCloskey got stopped.
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - 20 April 2019
Fair enough mateRuthless-RKO wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 10:08 You can call me a little biased. Only because I know him.
Tbh, not excusing last night, but he gets unnecessary hate.
After Joshua, he’s the highest earning BrItish boxer.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - 20 April 2019
I've always liked amir, though I do have to question peeing blood from where that shot was placed.
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - 20 April 2019
Yeah I was going to post that all those body shots are more likely the cause; that's IF he was actually peeing pink.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 15:18 I've always liked amir, though I do have to question peeing blood from where that shot was placed.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - 20 April 2019
i agree with overhand right.
khan was getting set up from the first, and taking some punishing blows. was hurt, then takes a bad low blow on top of it. can't really balme him at that point.
the ref should have made clear he had 5 mins. they never seem to give a low blowed fighter the 5 mins.
reminded me of ward-kovalev, though slightly different circumstances.
khan was getting set up from the first, and taking some punishing blows. was hurt, then takes a bad low blow on top of it. can't really balme him at that point.
the ref should have made clear he had 5 mins. they never seem to give a low blowed fighter the 5 mins.
reminded me of ward-kovalev, though slightly different circumstances.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 103248
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Terence Crawford vs. Amir Khan - 20 April 2019
In an interview with Fight Hub TV, Matchroom promoter Eddie Hearn shares some alternative facts on Amir Khan’s performance against Terence Crawford last weekend. Check out his takeaways from the fight...
Hearn on the unsatisfying ending of Crawford-Khan:
“I think, firstly, I’ve got to say that — and I know the question is ‘did he quit? — he’s incredibly brave. Watch the fight back, like in the round before it happened, or even when it happen, he was jumping in going for it. And he got put down in the first round, he was getting battered to the body, but kept trying, he kept going for it. And he got hit in the nuts, it was a clear low blow.”
On most people believing Khan got hit more in the leg than in the gonads:
“Whatever it was, the fact is he wasn’t going to win the fight from there, and he tried to win the fight, and I heard in the corner his should was — his hand was hurting as well. And I think Virgil made the decision to, ‘save him’ might be the wrong word, but I think it was very unlikely Amir was gonna win that fight from there.
“He tried, he’d been in there, jumped in, he was trading off at all times, as he does. So I think Virgil just said ‘No, you know what, this is the right time. It’s over.’”
On Kell Brook wanting to fight Crawford:
“Not really. I mean, Kell went to watch the fight, obviously had a long sort of drawn out process trying to get the Amir Khan fight, and now he wants the Terence Crawford fight. We 100% support him in that. I think Kell just wants the biggest fight possible. You know, he’s at that stage of his career, he don’t wanna fighting underneath his level. He wants to be pushed, he wants to be challenged, and right now in the welterweight division Terence Crawford is a massive challenge.”
Hearn on the unsatisfying ending of Crawford-Khan:
“I think, firstly, I’ve got to say that — and I know the question is ‘did he quit? — he’s incredibly brave. Watch the fight back, like in the round before it happened, or even when it happen, he was jumping in going for it. And he got put down in the first round, he was getting battered to the body, but kept trying, he kept going for it. And he got hit in the nuts, it was a clear low blow.”
On most people believing Khan got hit more in the leg than in the gonads:
“Whatever it was, the fact is he wasn’t going to win the fight from there, and he tried to win the fight, and I heard in the corner his should was — his hand was hurting as well. And I think Virgil made the decision to, ‘save him’ might be the wrong word, but I think it was very unlikely Amir was gonna win that fight from there.
“He tried, he’d been in there, jumped in, he was trading off at all times, as he does. So I think Virgil just said ‘No, you know what, this is the right time. It’s over.’”
On Kell Brook wanting to fight Crawford:
“Not really. I mean, Kell went to watch the fight, obviously had a long sort of drawn out process trying to get the Amir Khan fight, and now he wants the Terence Crawford fight. We 100% support him in that. I think Kell just wants the biggest fight possible. You know, he’s at that stage of his career, he don’t wanna fighting underneath his level. He wants to be pushed, he wants to be challenged, and right now in the welterweight division Terence Crawford is a massive challenge.”