Canelo over Crawford P4P

[Luckybattles]

People easily forget how feared GGG was. Canelo steps up and beats him 2x and is now fighting the other guy everyone believes is the best. meanwhile, Crawford is fighting bums with shiny records and a blown up has been that have been KTFO throughout his career. This is outrageous. People being called p4p for cherry picking, dodging, and hiding behind fraudulent promotions. How in the eff can anyone say that Crawford should be above canelo. The proof should be in the quality of opposition and not in the volume of hype and hypothetical victories. (E.g Crawford defeats sugar Ray Leonard).

[oogiebe]

It's still Alvarez at one for me.

[jamamb]

of course canelo has the better resume, that is obvious

[Nightmare Roy]

Canelo didn’t beat GGG once let alone twice, fcuk what those judges say.

[Onetimeonly]

Nonsense, p4p is mythical and not all about resume.otherwise PAC is #1. Crawford is a better fighter, Camelot has the better resume. I think bud could beat him straight up.

[Ruthless-RKO]

P4P lists should mainly be for weight classes.

The thing is P4P, if you look at just opponents, I can never see Spence in the top 10. Not really.

But P4P doesn’t just look at resumes does it.

[oogiebe]

P4P lists should mainly be for weight classes.

The thing is P4P, if you look at just opponents, I can never see Spence in the top 10. Not really.

But P4P doesn’t just look at resumes does it.

P4P is near impossible to get right. It's all guessing and hyperbole. A fun game at best.

[Onetimeonly]

I've had Crawford 1 for about 3 years. I was mocked over his resume then.

[SenorPipino]

Crawford doesn't have the names on his record to be #1.

He's been a pro over a decade and he's still in search of a defining win.

If all mighty ESPN didn't constantly shove his alleged greatness down everyone's throat, few would rank him at or near the top spot.

[jamamb]

you r obsessed with that espn hype stuff, lol as if all networks dont hype there guys, of course they do. sky does am showtime does, hbo sure as hell did, and ive seen some of the most laughably biased stuff on aussie and irish networks

loads had him near the top b4 espn, hes been dominant in every fight, was undisputed, won 3 weight titles, etc. hes obviously in the discussion, bizarre to say its only espn brainwashing ppl, maybe go back to fellating superstar mung for beating up little sadam and squeaking by hogie

[ClivePatrickLyons]

Canelo career will be tarnished by all them judge's and their score card's remember Trout/Lara what about Mayweather who was that judge who had that fight a Draw unbelievable bullsh.t and the 2 GGG Decision's GGG deserved something more then a draw and a Decision loss and the Rocky Fielding win instead of fighting the Real Champion who already smashed Fielding in 1 the Smith guy that'll keep him at number 1 p4p for a while yet wonder how the Judge's perform against Jacobs they will cement Canelo and Golden Boy legacy no doubt

[Onetimeonly]

you r obsessed with that espn hype stuff, lol as if all networks dont hype there guys, of course they do. sky does am showtime does, hbo sure as hell did, and ive seen some of the most laughably biased stuff on aussie and irish networks

loads had him near the top b4 espn, hes been dominant in every fight, was undisputed, won 3 weight titles, etc. hes obviously in the discussion, bizarre to say its only espn brainwashing ppl, maybe go back to fellating superstar mung for beating up little sadam and squeaking by hogie

He's obsessed with canelo.