WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

bm117
Welterweight
Posts: 3
Joined: 20 Feb 2016, 13:56

WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by bm117 »

Check out the ratings on their website. WBA basically just a footnote.

https://wbcboxing.com/en/welterweight/

A step in the right direction, the WBA has become a farce. Hopefully the IBF and WBO do the same.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101171
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Yeh, a strange one. I thought it was because WBA have more than one champion.

But at 140, only Relikh's the champion and they're still down there.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101171
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

TBH, if they didn't recognise them as a major world title, then Thurman, Pac would be ranked.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9435
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by tiny_acres »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 24 Apr 2019, 09:10 TBH, if they didn't recognise them as a major world title, then Thurman, Pac would be ranked.
Yes!!!!
That is what I'd like to see. Maybe we can get some mandatory unifications
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by oogiebe »

WBA is by far the worst rankings of the sanctioning bodies, but they all suck. I don't like precluding each others belt holders as it (obviously) makes their rankings incomplete at best. That said, the WBA has become a joke, even amongst jokes.
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by ewenhay »

oogiebe wrote: 24 Apr 2019, 09:33 WBA is by far the worst rankings of the sanctioning bodies, but they all suck. I don't like precluding each others belt holders as it (obviously) makes their rankings incomplete at best. That said, the WBA has become a joke, even amongst jokes.
The best thing the wbc could do is rank other champions. That way we get unification fights and they still get their sanctioning fees as well as the moral high ground over the other orgs.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by oogiebe »

ewenhay wrote: 24 Apr 2019, 14:09 The best thing the wbc could do is rank other champions. That way we get unification fights and they still get their sanctioning fees as well as the moral high ground over the other orgs.
Completely agree. I wonder if those fighters just refuse or their management makes that choice not to pay.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by oogiebe »

Boksgek wrote: 24 Apr 2019, 14:12 I think nobody really cares about the WBC does anyone? I rate the WBA far higher in every case.
You're kidding of course. The WBA is the worst of the lot. The WBC is probably the best, even though it leaves off the best HW out there.
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by ewenhay »

Fighters still talk about winning the WBC belt. It has a historical iconic status that the wbo and ibf don't have.

All orgs are corrupt and greedy though unfortunately
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9435
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by tiny_acres »

ewenhay wrote: 24 Apr 2019, 14:19 Fighters still talk about winning the WBC belt. It has a historical iconic status that the wbo and ibf don't have.

All orgs are corrupt and greedy though unfortunately
X2
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by oogiebe »

ewenhay wrote: 24 Apr 2019, 14:19 Fighters still talk about winning the WBC belt. It has a historical iconic status that the wbo and ibf don't have.

All orgs are corrupt and greedy though unfortunately
100%
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by oogiebe »

Boksgek wrote: 24 Apr 2019, 14:24 I think the boxrec rankings are the best TBH, in some cases even they are flawed, if you carefully select you can achieve high rankings.

I also think that if you end up in a different weightclass, your rating should be halfed or even quartered in the other weightclass. Piles of top cruiserweight have no chance at all in the heavyweights, despite they will receive a ridiculous high rating. Tony Bellew was rank 3 of the world as a heavyweight, which obviously never made sense.
I think BR takes .54 when a fighter goes from CW to HW. We'll see as soon as Usyk's first fight is in the books.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9007
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by Syntax Error »

bm117 wrote: 24 Apr 2019, 09:00 Check out the ratings on their website. WBA basically just a footnote.

https://wbcboxing.com/en/welterweight/

A step in the right direction, the WBA has become a farce. Hopefully the IBF and WBO do the same.
The WBC no longer recognising the WBA is like Telly Savalas not recognising Ving Rhames for being bald.😮

They're as bad as each other.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by Enlightened-One »

bm117 wrote: 24 Apr 2019, 09:00 Check out the ratings on their website. WBA basically just a footnote.

https://wbcboxing.com/en/welterweight/

A step in the right direction, the WBA has become a farce. Hopefully the IBF and WBO do the same.
Nothing has changed. The WBC has never recognised champions from other governing bodies.
greg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5311
Joined: 23 Mar 2007, 07:44

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by greg »

..all the usual tug-of-war and alphabets mudslinging at each other..
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by Onetimeonly »

oogiebe wrote: 24 Apr 2019, 09:33 WBA is by far the worst rankings of the sanctioning bodies, but they all suck. I don't like precluding each others belt holders as it (obviously) makes their rankings incomplete at best. That said, the WBA has become a joke, even amongst jokes.
Does this mean they don't recognize Joshua as a viable opponent for wilder?
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101171
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Enlightened-One wrote: 25 Apr 2019, 07:42 Nothing has changed. The WBC has never recognised champions from other governing bodies.
I believe you're right. :TU:

WBC always adding 'Diamond' belts to fights, to try and force mando's
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by oogiebe »

Onetimeonly wrote: 25 Apr 2019, 08:09 Does this mean they don't recognize Joshua as a viable opponent for wilder?
Funny you post that. As you know, the WBC doesn't have AJ in their rankings, but they endorsed an AJ/Wilder fight not too long ago. Money Money Money!
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101171
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

oogiebe wrote: 25 Apr 2019, 10:04 Funny you post that. As you know, the WBC doesn't have AJ in their rankings, but they endorsed an AJ/Wilder fight not too long ago. Money Money Money!
Non of the orgs have other org champions in their top 15 rankings.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by oogiebe »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 30 Apr 2019, 10:48 Non of the orgs have other org champions in their top 15 rankings.
I know. The point was how they "ok'd" the Wilder/AJ fight.
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by boxing_rocks »

Did Mendoza not send Soliman a birthday card. I bet the reason is some ridiculous thing like that.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by oogiebe »

boxing_rocks wrote: 30 Apr 2019, 11:05 Did Mendoza not send Soliman a birthday card. I bet the reason is some ridiculous thing like that.
Agreed. These guys are so power crazed and egocentric and apparently somewhat sensitive!!!
kbackup408
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1662
Joined: 08 Sep 2016, 12:58

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by kbackup408 »

It only makes sense if WBA no longer recognise the WBC :TU: - la guerra ha comenzado!
Deleted_Scenes
Middleweight
Posts: 633
Joined: 29 Oct 2013, 17:02

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by Deleted_Scenes »

So, with Canelo holding the WBC and WBA belts, does this mean he could become his own mandatory? :lol:
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: WBC no longer recognizing WBA as a major world title?

Post by oogiebe »

Deleted_Scenes wrote: 30 Apr 2019, 11:41 So, with Canelo holding the WBC and WBA belts, does this mean he could become his own mandatory? :lol:
:lol: Hilarious!
Post Reply