kbackup408 wrote: ↑01 May 2019, 15:58
yes pal, well said! something that didn't sit very well with me was what Golovkin did with Sanchez felt like he let the trainer go as soon as he got his major contract - what do you reckon?
It’s a tough one dude ...
Golovkin was already a beast long before he met Sanchez, not just an Olympic medalist but a legit amateur star having beaten a long list of other stand out fighters : Korobov, Bute , Andy Lee , Andre Dirrell.
He was also 18-0 with a huge KO percentage and was mandatory for the Interim WBA title. ( I think the fight for the interim title was his first with Sanchez ) .
At that point Sanchez has was in the wilderness having had success in the 90s but not much in the 00s until he linked up with GGG in 2010.
From that point Sánchez has made a lot of money and gained a great reputation on the back of GGGs success. So you could argue that Sanchez has been well rewarded financially out of the arrangement to date.
It is after all a commercial arrangement.
Sanchez will carry on training fighters for many years to come ( again due to his reputation that GGG enhanced ) . GGG has a year or two left in the game and he is the one getting punched in the head.
Now GGGs pay packet has increased by so much , I personally think in this specific situation GGG is within his moral rights to reduce the percentage the trainer gets, as long as in real dollar terms Sanchez’ pay per fight hasn’t dropped.
Sanchez has done very well out of the 8 years together but didn’t want to take a percentage cut , which I assume wasn’t a pay cut in real terms. This to me is ego and/or greed!
The hard work of making GGG the legend he is, was done by GGG himself and his amateur trainers.
Now in the other famous percentage cut - trainer / fighter bust up, Naz and Brendan Ingle , I was firmly on Ingles side . Ingle had taken Naz from literally day 1 to a world superstar. Something rarely seen in boxing and should have shared in the rewards that came.