Curry finally enshrined
-
Brian Seneca
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 85
- Joined: 06 Jun 2019, 13:19
Curry finally enshrined
I know some may disagree with me, but I feel Donald Curry had to wait too long to be induced into the hall of fame. I know he was SUPPOSED to be the next Leonard and beat Hagler. But from 83-86 was there a better welterweight? I still feel he beats Honeyghan 10 out of 10 times is could make weight comfortably. The night he beat McCrory he was electrifying. I don’t know if Leonard beats him on that night. Was ahead and hurt McCallum before he got careless. If Ray Mancini and Barry McGuigan both of whom I admired are enshrined. The Lone Star Cobra certainly deserves it.
Re: Curry finally enshrined
Maybe, but he managed to catch Milton at the right time. Even though I don't think he should be in the Hall, by today's standards he makes it, and that is okay.
Re: Curry finally enshrined
Curry did enough to earn enshrinement.
Re: Curry finally enshrined
meh, he was a boarderline case, fair to be inducted but not some long overdue entry
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9436
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Curry finally enshrined
One of my favorite fighters.Brian Seneca wrote: ↑06 Jun 2019, 13:30 I know some may disagree with me, but I feel Donald Curry had to wait too long to be induced into the hall of fame. I know he was SUPPOSED to be the next Leonard and beat Hagler. But from 83-86 was there a better welterweight? I still feel he beats Honeyghan 10 out of 10 times is could make weight comfortably. The night he beat McCrory he was electrifying. I don’t know if Leonard beats him on that night. Was ahead and hurt McCallum before he got careless. If Ray Mancini and Barry McGuigan both of whom I admired are enshrined. The Lone Star Cobra certainly deserves it.
His prime may have been short but during that prime he gives any welter in history a tough fight
Re: Curry finally enshrined
that slip inside the jab and left hook vs milt was picture perfect
-
Brian Seneca
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 85
- Joined: 06 Jun 2019, 13:19
Re: Curry finally enshrined
I get what you are saying. But my point is Mancini and McGuigan accomplished even LESS than Curry and didn’t have he overall skills. Out of the three Mancini faced a legend (Arguello) and lost. His reign was shorter than Curry and was never undisputed. Pedroza was a great fighter but on the decline when McGuigan beat him and although he faced stern competition I feel Azumah would have beaten him. Curry unified the title (I know the IBF awarded him their inaugural belt) and didn’t win it on a lucky punch or something. Aside from Leonard and Hearns I think he is the best welterweight of the 1980’s.
-
Roars Like Me
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1763
- Joined: 14 Feb 2006, 10:43
Re: Curry finally enshrined
I agree, I loved watching him, a real talent. He was flashy but not in a bad way for me. Fast hands, punch power. What's not to like. Fabulous fighter.
Re: Curry finally enshrined
A few years back we did a thing where we picked a team of boxers one in each division with the same letter starting their surname.
I think the C's did very well and in h2h match ups curry was picked often. In his prime at welter he was some fighter.
quote="Brian Seneca" post_id=5177442 time=1559842242 user_id=353319]
I know some may disagree with me, but I feel Donald Curry had to wait too long to be induced into the hall of fame. I know he was SUPPOSED to be the next Leonard and beat Hagler. But from 83-86 was there a better welterweight? I still feel he beats Honeyghan 10 out of 10 times is could make weight comfortably. The night he beat McCrory he was electrifying. I don’t know if Leonard beats him on that night. Was ahead and hurt McCallum before he got careless. If Ray Mancini and Barry McGuigan both of whom I admired are enshrined. The Lone Star Cobra certainly deserves it.
[/quote]
I think the C's did very well and in h2h match ups curry was picked often. In his prime at welter he was some fighter.
quote="Brian Seneca" post_id=5177442 time=1559842242 user_id=353319]
I know some may disagree with me, but I feel Donald Curry had to wait too long to be induced into the hall of fame. I know he was SUPPOSED to be the next Leonard and beat Hagler. But from 83-86 was there a better welterweight? I still feel he beats Honeyghan 10 out of 10 times is could make weight comfortably. The night he beat McCrory he was electrifying. I don’t know if Leonard beats him on that night. Was ahead and hurt McCallum before he got careless. If Ray Mancini and Barry McGuigan both of whom I admired are enshrined. The Lone Star Cobra certainly deserves it.
[/quote]
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Curry finally enshrined
With guys like vitali and gatti in he's overdue for sure. Not that I go by previous mistakes as a barometer but looking at his resume compared to theirs combined he's more deserving.Brian Seneca wrote: ↑07 Jun 2019, 07:22 I get what you are saying. But my point is Mancini and McGuigan accomplished even LESS than Curry and didn’t have he overall skills. Out of the three Mancini faced a legend (Arguello) and lost. His reign was shorter than Curry and was never undisputed. Pedroza was a great fighter but on the decline when McGuigan beat him and although he faced stern competition I feel Azumah would have beaten him. Curry unified the title (I know the IBF awarded him their inaugural belt) and didn’t win it on a lucky punch or something. Aside from Leonard and Hearns I think he is the best welterweight of the 1980’s.