Curry finally enshrined

Post Reply
Brian Seneca
Super Featherweight
Posts: 85
Joined: 06 Jun 2019, 13:19

Curry finally enshrined

Post by Brian Seneca »

I know some may disagree with me, but I feel Donald Curry had to wait too long to be induced into the hall of fame. I know he was SUPPOSED to be the next Leonard and beat Hagler. But from 83-86 was there a better welterweight? I still feel he beats Honeyghan 10 out of 10 times is could make weight comfortably. The night he beat McCrory he was electrifying. I don’t know if Leonard beats him on that night. Was ahead and hurt McCallum before he got careless. If Ray Mancini and Barry McGuigan both of whom I admired are enshrined. The Lone Star Cobra certainly deserves it.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7142
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Curry finally enshrined

Post by Nile4000 »

Maybe, but he managed to catch Milton at the right time. Even though I don't think he should be in the Hall, by today's standards he makes it, and that is okay.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Curry finally enshrined

Post by oogiebe »

Curry did enough to earn enshrinement.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Curry finally enshrined

Post by jamamb »

meh, he was a boarderline case, fair to be inducted but not some long overdue entry
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Curry finally enshrined

Post by oogiebe »

jamamb wrote: 06 Jun 2019, 16:45 meh, he was a boarderline case, fair to be inducted but not some long overdue entry
Oh agreed. Wasn't a slam dunk by any means.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Curry finally enshrined

Post by tiny_acres »

Brian Seneca wrote: 06 Jun 2019, 13:30 I know some may disagree with me, but I feel Donald Curry had to wait too long to be induced into the hall of fame. I know he was SUPPOSED to be the next Leonard and beat Hagler. But from 83-86 was there a better welterweight? I still feel he beats Honeyghan 10 out of 10 times is could make weight comfortably. The night he beat McCrory he was electrifying. I don’t know if Leonard beats him on that night. Was ahead and hurt McCallum before he got careless. If Ray Mancini and Barry McGuigan both of whom I admired are enshrined. The Lone Star Cobra certainly deserves it.
One of my favorite fighters.
His prime may have been short but during that prime he gives any welter in history a tough fight
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Curry finally enshrined

Post by jamamb »

that slip inside the jab and left hook vs milt was picture perfect
Brian Seneca
Super Featherweight
Posts: 85
Joined: 06 Jun 2019, 13:19

Re: Curry finally enshrined

Post by Brian Seneca »

oogiebe wrote: 06 Jun 2019, 16:47 Oh agreed. Wasn't a slam dunk by any means.
I get what you are saying. But my point is Mancini and McGuigan accomplished even LESS than Curry and didn’t have he overall skills. Out of the three Mancini faced a legend (Arguello) and lost. His reign was shorter than Curry and was never undisputed. Pedroza was a great fighter but on the decline when McGuigan beat him and although he faced stern competition I feel Azumah would have beaten him. Curry unified the title (I know the IBF awarded him their inaugural belt) and didn’t win it on a lucky punch or something. Aside from Leonard and Hearns I think he is the best welterweight of the 1980’s.
Roars Like Me
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1763
Joined: 14 Feb 2006, 10:43

Re: Curry finally enshrined

Post by Roars Like Me »

I agree, I loved watching him, a real talent. He was flashy but not in a bad way for me. Fast hands, punch power. What's not to like. Fabulous fighter.
cfang
Middleweight
Posts: 946
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 16:50

Re: Curry finally enshrined

Post by cfang »

A few years back we did a thing where we picked a team of boxers one in each division with the same letter starting their surname.

I think the C's did very well and in h2h match ups curry was picked often. In his prime at welter he was some fighter.


quote="Brian Seneca" post_id=5177442 time=1559842242 user_id=353319]
I know some may disagree with me, but I feel Donald Curry had to wait too long to be induced into the hall of fame. I know he was SUPPOSED to be the next Leonard and beat Hagler. But from 83-86 was there a better welterweight? I still feel he beats Honeyghan 10 out of 10 times is could make weight comfortably. The night he beat McCrory he was electrifying. I don’t know if Leonard beats him on that night. Was ahead and hurt McCallum before he got careless. If Ray Mancini and Barry McGuigan both of whom I admired are enshrined. The Lone Star Cobra certainly deserves it.
[/quote]
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Curry finally enshrined

Post by Onetimeonly »

jamamb wrote: 06 Jun 2019, 16:45 meh, he was a boarderline case, fair to be inducted but not some long overdue entry
Agreed, he was a favorite of mine at the time but I struggle to see him beating honeyghan 10 times out of 10.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Curry finally enshrined

Post by Onetimeonly »

Brian Seneca wrote: 07 Jun 2019, 07:22 I get what you are saying. But my point is Mancini and McGuigan accomplished even LESS than Curry and didn’t have he overall skills. Out of the three Mancini faced a legend (Arguello) and lost. His reign was shorter than Curry and was never undisputed. Pedroza was a great fighter but on the decline when McGuigan beat him and although he faced stern competition I feel Azumah would have beaten him. Curry unified the title (I know the IBF awarded him their inaugural belt) and didn’t win it on a lucky punch or something. Aside from Leonard and Hearns I think he is the best welterweight of the 1980’s.
With guys like vitali and gatti in he's overdue for sure. Not that I go by previous mistakes as a barometer but looking at his resume compared to theirs combined he's more deserving.
Post Reply