Fielding was better than Rolls
Fielding was better than Rolls
Fielding was in the top-15 of the 168 division
The fight was in 168 pounds, not catchweight
Canelo fought against him 3 months later of the rematch vs GGG.
A lot of people was talking sh.it about this fight.
Rolls was not in the top-70 of the 160
Rolls is 35 years old.
Only had 1 fight of 10 rounds.
He never fought against a top-50 fighter
NOBODY IS TALKINH SH.IT ABOUT THIS FIGHT.
The hate against Canelo is too much
The fight was in 168 pounds, not catchweight
Canelo fought against him 3 months later of the rematch vs GGG.
A lot of people was talking sh.it about this fight.
Rolls was not in the top-70 of the 160
Rolls is 35 years old.
Only had 1 fight of 10 rounds.
He never fought against a top-50 fighter
NOBODY IS TALKINH SH.IT ABOUT THIS FIGHT.
The hate against Canelo is too much
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9436
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
I haven't seen too many defend GGG for taking this fight
Pretty much anyone said Rolls had zero chance and GGG needed a better opponent
Pretty much anyone said Rolls had zero chance and GGG needed a better opponent
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
bizarre thread, they were both weak ass fights and pretty much no one (well maybe boxing rocks lol) said otherwise, pretty funny that anyone feels the need to defend one being better then the other
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
I have said multiple times that GGG vs Rolls is a boring mismatch. Nobody disagreed with me.
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
A lot of fans enjoyed the brutal K.O and they are celebrating the win…
False, Fielding was better tan Rolls, that's a fact, not my opinión, Rocky was younger, top-15 of the 168, way bigger tan Canelo .
Rolls was not in top-75.
This fight was one of the worst mismatch ever
And GGG's career is full of fighters like Roll
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
no one is rating rolls, it was widely hailed as a huge mismatch, both were weak ass fights and too sh!t for really anyone except you i guess to care who was better
ya gggs career is full of soft touches, but who gives a f@ck who was better btwn rolls and fielding, this is iron frost stuff
ya gggs career is full of soft touches, but who gives a f@ck who was better btwn rolls and fielding, this is iron frost stuff
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
It's a fact, it does not matter what you can say, Fielding was better than Rolls.jamamb wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 00:08 no one is rating rolls, it was widely hailed as a huge mismatch, both were weak ass fights and too sh!t for really anyone except you i guess to care who was better
ya gggs career is full of soft touches, but who gives a f@ck who was better btwn rolls and fielding, this is iron frost stuff
The point is GGG always has the press in his side, nobody is talking about the tremendous mismatch, they are celebrating the big K.O.
When Canelo fought against Fielding, all the press and fans were talking sh.it, look the comments in YouTube or Instagram, nobody is talking sh.it about GGG cherrypick.
I was fan of GGG but this guy has a lot of sh.it in his career
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
hardly seen anyone celebrating, seen waay more ppl call it a crappy mismatch, pretty much no one thinks it was some big win or adds to anyones resume, both awful fights
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
Man, this fórum is too small but look this comment:
????Thomastearns wrote: ↑08 Jun 2019, 08:28 I'm impressed with what I've seen of Steve Rolls so far but unfortunately for him it looks like GGG is, shock horror, actually improving.
Now, read the comments in YT or Instagram, all the fans of GGG are celebrating and calling out Canelo.
GGG is a diva, man, and he is a master of cherry picks.
He did the same against Murray.
But he was not able to K.O the only two good rivals in his career (Jacobs and Canelo)
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
It would only be a fact if fielding beat rolle. That would be a tight fight. With all due respect, you're gay.
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
Rolls record was not impressive but i thought he put up a good fight and was holding his own until the knockout which i thought was very spectacular. GGG in reality has won every single fight.
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
And Callum Smith who is the REAL WBA Super Middleweight Champ finished Rocky in one round its a joke the way Golden Boy get away with these fights
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101191
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
Rolls put up a better fight than Fielding. If I HAD TO watch one of them again, it would be the GGG fight.
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
Right on!ClivePatrickLyons wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 04:08 And Callum Smith who is the REAL WBA Super Middleweight Champ finished Rocky in one round its a joke the way Golden Boy get away with these fights
It pisses me off all the talk of Canelo being a SMW champ from beating Fielding
I like Fielding, he still has plenty of really good domestic tear ups ahead, but he is not a champion, he is a good domestic top #3 on the UK scene- and top #3 because Groves retired.
-
jonnyyorkshu
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 449
- Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
The op needs some sudocrem
Re: Fielding was better than Rolls
There should be special conferences for Gingerhead and Fury fans to compare trolling notes at.