Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
At their best at heavyweight, would Morrison swarm over the elusive Young with his body punches and a left hook to take a 15 round decision despite being unable to knock him out.? Or would Young use his jab, movement and counter punches to decision Morrison in 15 rounds like Young did to Ali, where people felt Young was robbed, upsetting George Foreman and Ron Lyle (twice), drew with Earnie Shavers in their rematch and against Ken Norton, where half of the people felt Young was robbed also? What do you guys think?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16895
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
Young by wiiiiiiiiiide decision.
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
Young by wide decision.Too much skilled boxer for Tommy.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
I like Morrison here.
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
Young would be more likely to outbox Morrison, unless Tommy got to him with some clean bombs.
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
Morrison always does well when he's facing a guy who can't punch. Let's not forget that Morrison also had the ability to box really well.
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
If we're talking Jimmy Young from 1974-1977, Tommy Morrison doesn't have much of a shot beating him. If Shavers could only manage a draw, Foreman lost a decision, as did Ron Lyle, Ali had to be gifted a decision, and Norton arguably was also gifted a decision.... No way is Morrison winning.
Now Young from 1978-1990, Morrison absolutely knocks the snot out of him. If Cooney, Ocasio, Tubbs, Tucker, Page, Dokes, etc could do it so could Morrison.
Now Young from 1978-1990, Morrison absolutely knocks the snot out of him. If Cooney, Ocasio, Tubbs, Tucker, Page, Dokes, etc could do it so could Morrison.
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
Actually I won't take Lyle and Shavers bouts as factors in this particular case, cause Morrison was a better boxer, than those two. But obviously a schooling of young Foreman and very close Ali and Norton fights tell a lot.HomicideHenry wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 11:37 If we're talking Jimmy Young from 1974-1977, Tommy Morrison doesn't have much of a shot beating him. If Shavers could only manage a draw, Foreman lost a decision, as did Ron Lyle, Ali had to be gifted a decision, and Norton arguably was also gifted a decision.... No way is Morrison winning.
Now Young from 1978-1990, Morrison absolutely knocks the snot out of him. If Cooney, Ocasio, Tubbs, Tucker, Page, Dokes, etc could do it so could Morrison.
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
Ron Lyle was in my view a good boxer. Outside of his power, he could put combinations together and he could set up trap's. He wasn't just a banger. From memory, he was beating Ali on the scorecards before getting stopped.
Shavers was just mind blowing in power. Outside of that he wasn't all that good. He had stamina issues. He was prone to cuts. He could be out fought or out boxed, as Quarry and Holmes shown. But all he needed was one shot more times than not. If you could survive the first few rounds you had a helluva chance.
Shavers was just mind blowing in power. Outside of that he wasn't all that good. He had stamina issues. He was prone to cuts. He could be out fought or out boxed, as Quarry and Holmes shown. But all he needed was one shot more times than not. If you could survive the first few rounds you had a helluva chance.
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
Lyle was good, but still he was more of a puncher, than a boxer. Ali was toying with him for the majority of the fight, Quarry outclassed him.HomicideHenry wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 12:03 Ron Lyle was in my view a good boxer. Outside of his power, he could put combinations together and he could set up trap's. He wasn't just a banger. From memory, he was beating Ali on the scorecards before getting stopped.
Shavers was just mind blowing in power. Outside of that he wasn't all that good. He had stamina issues. He was prone to cuts. He could be out fought or out boxed, as Quarry and Holmes shown. But all he needed was one shot more times than not. If you could survive the first few rounds you had a helluva chance.
And yes, Shavers was even more linked to the puncher's status.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
Young survives getting caught a couple of time's to win a clear un dec 
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
You could be right. It was better to move against such fast and vicious puncher Tommy was.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 17:40 Tommy was fast and strong. I don't think laying on the ropes would work out well for Jimmy.
-
Cojimar 1946
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 05:00
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
I think Morrison is pretty overrated. Not only did he lose whenever he stepped up in competition but he frequently struggled with inferior opposition.
Were talking about a guy who couldn't do better than draw with Ross Purrity (while getting decked twice)
who lost to Michael Bentt.
who got dropped multiple times by a shot Carl Williams.
Do people think Jimmy Young loses to Michael Bentt and Ross Purrity?
Were talking about a guy who couldn't do better than draw with Ross Purrity (while getting decked twice)
who lost to Michael Bentt.
who got dropped multiple times by a shot Carl Williams.
Do people think Jimmy Young loses to Michael Bentt and Ross Purrity?
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
He was masterful and stuck to a game plan against Foreman. He had some really good performances. Young was overrated.Cojimar 1946 wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 14:19 Morrison was basically a gatekeeper. When he stepped up he lost badly. What is there on his resume to suggest he poses any sort of threat to Young?
-
Cojimar 1946
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 05:00
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
Not against quality opposition. I hardly think outboxing that version of Foreman tells us much. Axel Schultz outboxed Foreman only to get robbed by the judges. Does Axel Schultz also beat Jimmy Young?
Jimmy Young has quality wins and during his prime nothing comparable to the Purrity and Bentt debacles
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
To be forthright, I saw Young during the 70's and really hated him, so I admit I may be biased. His ducking inside the ropes to avoid punishment really irked me.Cojimar 1946 wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 14:31 Not against quality opposition. I hardly think outboxing that version of Foreman tells us much. Axel Schultz outboxed Foreman only to get robbed by the judges. Does Axel Schultz also beat Jimmy Young?
Jimmy Young has quality wins and during his prime nothing comparable to the Purrity and Bentt debacles
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
i dont think tommy gets rated high enough to be overrated tbh, most ppl know he was athletically gifted with some explosivness to his speed and power, but very flawed overallCojimar 1946 wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 14:19 I think Morrison is pretty overrated. Not only did he lose whenever he stepped up in competition but he frequently struggled with inferior opposition.
Were talking about a guy who couldn't do better than draw with Ross Purrity (while getting decked twice)
who lost to Michael Bentt.
who got dropped multiple times by a shot Carl Williams.
Do people think Jimmy Young loses to Michael Bentt and Ross Purrity?
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
He's underrated. Where as cooney who Tommy was better then, is overly romanticized. Both were vulnerable but Morrison brought more to the table and accomplished.
-
Cojimar 1946
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 05:00
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
Are Ross Purrity and Michael Bentt also underrated in your opinion? I'm just wondering, given what they both did to MorrisonOnetimeonly wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 14:49 He's underrated. Where as cooney who Tommy was better then, is overly romanticized. Both were vulnerable but Morrison brought more to the table and accomplished.
I would say Morrison was at about the same level as Ross Purrity, Axel Schultz, and Frans Botha.
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
Bentt actually had potential and ability. He just didn't really love the game. Like Buster Douglas. "I'm a fighter not an athlete," type of mentality.
Purity, I think is somewhat underrated. He wasn't as horrible as people made him out to be. Sure his greatest attribute was toughness, but he was a very well conditioned man who could bang back. He was a spoiler, sorta like Bert Cooper. Maybe not as good, but not too far off.
Purity, I think is somewhat underrated. He wasn't as horrible as people made him out to be. Sure his greatest attribute was toughness, but he was a very well conditioned man who could bang back. He was a spoiler, sorta like Bert Cooper. Maybe not as good, but not too far off.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
Wlad knows Ross didn't suck. Cooper was much better and much less dedicated.HomicideHenry wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 16:22 Bentt actually had potential and ability. He just didn't really love the game. Like Buster Douglas. "I'm a fighter not an athlete," type of mentality.
Purity, I think is somewhat underrated. He wasn't as horrible as people made him out to be. Sure his greatest attribute was toughness, but he was a very well conditioned man who could bang back. He was a spoiler, sorta like Bert Cooper. Maybe not as good, but not too far off.
-
Cojimar 1946
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 05:00
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
Jimmy Young proved he could compete with the top dogs of his era. He beat Foreman and Lyle and lost a highly controversial decision to Ken Norton that many thought he deserved to win. There is a pretty big contrast with a guy who got blown out by Bentt and struggled with the likes of Purrity.HomicideHenry wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 16:22 Bentt actually had potential and ability. He just didn't really love the game. Like Buster Douglas. "I'm a fighter not an athlete," type of mentality.
Purity, I think is somewhat underrated. He wasn't as horrible as people made him out to be. Sure his greatest attribute was toughness, but he was a very well conditioned man who could bang back. He was a spoiler, sorta like Bert Cooper. Maybe not as good, but not too far off.
You would basically be arguing that the journeymen of the 1990s are as good as the very best of the 1970s.
Last edited by Cojimar 1946 on 11 Jun 2019, 19:01, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Heavyweights: Tommy Morrison vs Jimmy Young
LOL! That he did!Onetimeonly wrote: ↑11 Jun 2019, 16:56 Wlad knows Ross didn't suck. Cooper was much better and much less dedicated.
-
Cojimar 1946
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 05:00