Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post Reply

Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Yes
62
65%
No
33
35%
 
Total votes: 95

ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by ValMar »

I mean - Yes !
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by dagilechia »

At least
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by dagilechia »

ValMar wrote: 15 Jun 2019, 18:27 I mean - Yes !
Only the result of "should robert and adelaide byrd be put in jail (as well as the businessman who are behind mr. Deer policeman and wbss)?" Would be more obvious.

Look how happy Briedis was, like it was no controversy there and like Glowacki was the one who intentionally fouled.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by ValMar »

dagilechia wrote: 15 Jun 2019, 18:28At least
I think it is impossible now to demand a DQ, but NC would be proper decision.

BTW, for me, it should have been a DQ.
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by boxing_rocks »

Briedis should be beheaded and Glowaki should be declared a national hero and the best ever.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by ValMar »

boxing_rocks wrote: 15 Jun 2019, 18:39 Briedis should be beheaded and Glowaki should be declared a national hero and the best ever.
Briedis should have been DQ-ed, and old Byrd should have been arrested.
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by boxing_rocks »

ValMar wrote: 15 Jun 2019, 18:43 Briedis should have been DQ-ed, and old Byrd should have been arrested.
Glowaki should have been DQ'ed first then.
greg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5317
Joined: 23 Mar 2007, 07:44

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by greg »

..of course and fukking ban them Nevada State Athletic Commission dream team from officiating at least abroad if you can't do that back at home.. :witzend:
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by dagilechia »

boxing_rocks wrote: 15 Jun 2019, 18:44 Glowaki should have been DQ'ed first then.
You know less about boxing than casuals then.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by oogiebe »

dagilechia wrote: 15 Jun 2019, 18:50 You know less about boxing than casuals then.
Take it easy, brother. You're way too emotional right now. Take a breath.
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by dagilechia »

oogiebe wrote: 15 Jun 2019, 18:51 Take it easy, brother. You're way too emotional right now. Take a breath.
It's annoying that casuals who knows boxing only from tv, streams and boxing newsites (sorry if im wrong) suggest that my opinion on what happened in this fight is only because i am Polish. I get emotiona because of that because Glowacki is one of my fav fighters, but i would think the same if it was an Eskimo knocked out by an Khmer.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by oogiebe »

dagilechia wrote: 15 Jun 2019, 18:55 It's annoying that casuals who knows boxing only from tv, streams and boxing newsites (sorry if im wrong) suggest that my opinion on what happened in this fight is only because i am Polish. I get emotiona because of that because Glowacki is one of my fav fighters, but i would think the same if it was an Eskimo knocked out by an Khmer.
Only one poster mentioned the Polish thing. Don't let it get to you. I'd bet when the dust settles, we'll see an overturned decision and a rematch ordered. It was just too obvious that the official lost control inside the ring.
armageto
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5260
Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by armageto »

I don't think it is. If anything blame Byrd for not hearing the bell. Glowacki cotinued to fight after the bell, should Briedis just stop? The elbow was dirty, but at the same time Glowacki hit Briedis in the back of the head, clearly, plus the ref said break. A lot of fuckery happened in this fight, but Briedis to me should keep the win, fight Dorticos, and then rematch Glowacki.
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by dagilechia »

oogiebe wrote: 15 Jun 2019, 18:57 Only one poster mentioned the Polish thing. Don't let it get to you. I'd bet when the dust settles, we'll see an overturned decision and a rematch ordered. It was just too obvious that the official lost control inside the ring.
The "Glowacki should be declared a national hero" comment in this topic was an obvious attack on me and a suggestion that i am biased due to my nationality.
greg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5317
Joined: 23 Mar 2007, 07:44

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by greg »

..can't remember offhand when I saw last such a nasty elbow punch after the ref said break, who knows: it could have been a determining factor ...then again this dinosaur of a referee..obviously out of his depths .. :witzend:
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by boxing_rocks »

dagilechia wrote: 15 Jun 2019, 19:01 The "Glowacki should be declared a national hero" comment in this topic was an obvious attack on me and a suggestion that i am biased due to my nationality.
What I meant by that is that you present things like there is a hero and a villain, while they were both dirty, and Glowaki may have started it.
vostok
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 75
Joined: 06 Mar 2007, 07:05

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by vostok »

I voted "yes"..

A "no contest" is the only fair way to make this right.
And I don't like the behavior of briedis after the fight.

However;

Nothing would've changed the inevitable outcome of this fight I think..
Briedis is better, and he deserves to be in the final with Dorticos.. imho
Lennox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1083
Joined: 26 May 2002, 12:35

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by Lennox »

Yes
3132DW
Middleweight
Posts: 1435
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 03:27

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by 3132DW »

ValMar wrote: 15 Jun 2019, 18:33 I think it is impossible now to demand a DQ, but NC would be proper decision.

BTW, for me, it should have been a DQ.
Same here....should have been DQ - as it was so blatant and right in front of referee (who was truly awful)
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by dagilechia »

vostok wrote: 15 Jun 2019, 19:24 I voted "yes"..

A "no contest" is the only fair way to make this right.
And I don't like the behavior of briedis after the fight.

However;

Nothing would've changed the inevitable outcome of this fight I think..
Briedis is better, and he deserves to be in the final with Dorticos.. imho
Glowacki won the first round though and the result wasnt obvious before the elbow punch
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by SenorPipino »

Always let the official's handling of the fight stand.

Don't overturn anything.

I suspect the result will remain in favor of Breidis although a rematch will undoubtedly be ordered.

Glowacki started the shenanigans with that illegal cracking shot to the back of Briedis' head.

Briedis got dirty in return (which is what a fighter should do when fouled) and took over. Glowacki paid the price for his initial foul tactic.
Contendeh
Welterweight
Posts: 515
Joined: 12 Jun 2016, 10:30

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by Contendeh »

Totally fine with an elbow to the jaw after an intentional shot to the back of the head.

Jaws heal, brain bleeds end careers.
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by dagilechia »

SenorPipino wrote: 15 Jun 2019, 19:42 Always let the official's handling of the fight stand.

Don't overturn anything.

I suspect the result will remain in favor of Breidis although a rematch will undoubtedly be ordered.

Glowacki started the shenanigans with that illegal cracking shot to the back of Briedis' head.

Briedis got dirty in return (which is what a fighter should do when fouled) and took over. Glowacki paid the price for his initial foul tactic.
What? They should not. Tyson should get DQ'd vs Holyfield, Briedis should be DQ'd vs Glowacki.
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by dagilechia »

Contendeh wrote: 15 Jun 2019, 19:52 Totally fine with an elbow to the jaw after an intentional shot to the back of the head.

Jaws heal, brain bleeds end careers.
It did not looked intentional though. It looked like one of the thousands of unintentional fouls.
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?

Post by dagilechia »

Btw - Breidis team went to the ring during the fight - it is a DQ.
Post Reply