Hearn says rematch clause triggered

Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28510
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Hearn says rematch clause triggered

Post by Coco »

Onetimeonly wrote: 19 Jun 2019, 16:48 No, it was a mandatory. The Klitschko's were brutal with that poo. Vitali wanted Hayes first born son.
There was a rematch clause there yeah?
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Hearn says rematch clause triggered

Post by Onetimeonly »

Coco wrote: 19 Jun 2019, 16:55 There was a rematch clause there yeah?
Yup
stellar
Super Lightweight
Posts: 247
Joined: 19 Nov 2016, 07:00

Re: Hearn says rematch clause triggered

Post by stellar »

Coco wrote: 19 Jun 2019, 08:47 Was Klit v Fury a voluntary? I can't remember


from wbo or wba.urcite it was a mandatory defense. i think of wbo it was.wlado that fight generally did not want and Fury was obligatory for chisora when fury in a box with Hammer, so he knew that Klicko had to box with him and Klicko on voluntary jenningsa.sorry my english :zzz:
Post Reply