Dillian Whyte could be in danger of being pushed down the WBC Ratings if insults continue

[oogiebe]

Do you put effort into being annoying, or does it just come naturally to you?

A fighters commerical value is only as much as someone is willing to pay, DAZN didnt give a poo about Whyte in the US. They wanted an american fighter hence why Miller was picked, Do keep up.

EO is a delusionary c$nt. Don't waste your time unless you are having fun with him. Something not right in the head.

[Nondescript]

We’re not talking about the amateurs. Whyte has earned the right to refuse to be exploited.

Yeah because being offered £4 million is being exploited

Noone would even give a shit about Whyte if it wasnt for Joshua. He was built up on Joshua's undercards. Before joining matchroom, he was fighting scrubs for peanuts and some of his fights wernt even on tv.

[Enlightened-One]

Do you put effort into being annoying, or does it just come naturally to you?

A fighters commerical value is only as much as someone is willing to pay, DAZN didnt give a poo about Whyte in the US. They wanted an american fighter hence why Miller was picked, Do keep up.

You’re annoyed because I know more about the subject matter than you do and you also know (as well as the rest of the forum, I might add) that I’m always able to back-up my claims with evidence.

Others can’t l, but I can.

If that annoys you, then tread more carefully. Don’t engage with arguments with people more knowledgeable than yourself.

[Nondescript]

You’re annoyed because I know more about the subject matter than you do and you also know (as well as the rest of the forum, I might add) that I’m always able to back-up my claims with evidence.

Others can’t l, but I can.

If that annoys you, then tread more carefully. Don’t engage with arguments with people more knowledgeable than yourself.

- no, you're a Narcissist, there's a difference. A lot of your claims are your opinions.

[oogiebe]

- no, you're a Narcissist, there's a different. A lot of your claims are your opinions.

Hey! That's the word I use to describe EO. Get your own! LMAO!

[Nondescript]

Hey! That's the word I use to describe EO. Get your own! LMAO!

He argues like he's being paid to do so. Its very strange.

[Enlightened-One]

EO is a delusionary c$nt. Don't waste your time unless you are having fun with him. Something not right in the head.

You’re offended because you can’t refute my claims.

I always back-up my words, but you can’t.

It’s kind of funny seeing cheerleading others who fail to undermine my claims.

[ewenhay]

You’re annoyed because I know more about the subject matter than you do and you also know (as well as the rest of the forum, I might add) that I’m always able to back-up my claims with evidence.

Others can’t l, but I can.

If that annoys you, then tread more carefully. Don’t engage with arguments with people more knowledgeable than yourself.

I hope you are sitting down as the following statement is going to come as a shock to you.

Just because something is on Google doesn't make it factual

[Nondescript]

You’re offended because you can’t refute my claims.

I always back-up my words, but you can’t.

It’s kind of funny seeing cheerleading others who fail to undermine my claims.

You saying a fighter has a right to not be exploited (in regards to being offered £4 million for a world title fight) is an opinion, its not a fact.

[Enlightened-One]

He argues like he's being paid to do so. Its very strange.

I argue with FACTS!

I follow boxing very closely, more than most.

It’s easy to prove others wrong when they don’t appreciate the sport as much as I do and they choose to possess derogatory opinions based on ignorance, since they flatly refuse to lift a finger to validate their own weird claims.

[oogiebe]

He argues like he's being paid to do so. Its very strange.

He doesn't add value to the forum. He thinks he's the 'great debater' and sometimes someone falls into his trap of his narcissistic feeding frenzy, by replying to him in good faith. Something is 'off' with this one. It's a shame, because every once in a while he'll actually make a decent point. But when he gets hyper focused on some miniscule and most times irrelevant point it's difficult not to ignore him.

[Nondescript]

He doesn't add value to the forum. He thinks he's the 'great debater' and sometimes someone falls into his trap of his narcissistic feeding frenzy, by replying to him in good faith. Something is 'off' with this one. It's a shame, because every once in a while he'll actually make a decent point. But when he gets hyper focused on some miniscule and most times irrelevant point it's difficult not to ignore him.

True.

[ewenhay]

I argue with FACTS!

I follow boxing very closely, more than most.

It’s easy to prove others wrong when they don’t appreciate the sport as much as I do and they choose to possess derogatory opinions based on ignorance, since they flatly refuse to lift a finger to validate their own weird claims.

You don't know what a fact is.

[oogiebe]

I hope you are sitting down as the following statement is going to come as a shock to you.

Just because something is on Google doesn't make it factual

*GASP!*

[Enlightened-One]

You saying a fighter has a right to not be exploited (in regards to being offered £4 million for a world title fight) is an opinion, its not a fact.

You’re saying that Pulev and Miller deserve to be ahead of him in the world title shot queue and they also deserve to be paid millions more too.

[Nondescript]

You’re saying that Pulev and Miller deserve to be ahead of him in the world title shot queue and they also deserve to be paid millions more too.

Where did i say that though? You're now claiming ive made statements that i havent even made

[Enlightened-One]

You don't know what a fact is.

Pick one single claim I’ve made and provide counter evidence.

Please educate me.

You won’t and can’t do this because you’re too lazy and if you weren’t, you’d be scared to discover me being right!

[ewenhay]

Pick one single claim I’ve made and provide counter evidence.

Please educate me.

You won’t and can’t do this because you’re too lazy and if you weren’t, you’d be scared to discover me being right!

You type a word or phrase into a search engine then believe everything that is listed in the search results is a 'fact'

You then pass this off as extensive 'research' even though you make no effort to verify the truth of anything listed in the Google search results.

There are hundreds of examples of you doing this. Almost daily in fact. You've got yourself into bother for this on at least 2 threads today alone.

[oogiebe]

You type a word or phrase into a search engine then believe everything that is listed in the search results is a 'fact'

You then pass this off as extensive 'research' even though you make no effort to verify the truth of anything listed in the Google search results.

There are hundreds of examples of you doing this. Almost daily in fact. You've got yourself into bother for this on at least 2 threads today alone.

Truth!

[Enlightened-One]

You type a word or phrase into a search engine then believe everything that is listed in the search results is a 'fact'

You then pass this off as extensive 'research' even though you make no effort to verify the truth of anything listed in the Google search results.

There are hundreds of examples of you doing this. Almost daily in fact. You've got yourself into bother for this on at least 2 threads today alone.

Pick one single claim I’ve made and provide counter evidence.

Please educate me.

You won’t and can’t do this because you’re too lazy and if you weren’t, you’d be scared to discover me being right!

We’re not talking about some sort of religious deity. So stop being lazy and fûckîng prove me wrong!

[ewenhay]

Pick one single claim I’ve made and provide counter evidence.

Please educate me.

You won’t and can’t do this because you’re too lazy and if you weren’t, you’d be scared to discover me being right!

We’re not talking about some sort of religious deity. So stop being lazy and fûckîng prove me wrong!

There are hundreds but here is one from less than an hour ago to get us started.

You said on another thread that it is a fact that professional boxers are in the gym training 365 days per year.

When it is clearly not a fact. But in fact is complete pish

[oogiebe]

Pick one single claim I’ve made and provide counter evidence.

Please educate me.

You won’t and can’t do this because you’re too lazy and if you weren’t, you’d be scared to discover me being right!

We’re not talking about some sort of religious deity. So stop being lazy and fûckîng prove me wrong!

Prove it to who? You? You'd never believe it anyway, or you'll re-spin it into what you think is in your favor. No one on this forum takes you seriously when you go into hyperdrive. You're better when you're calm and make short points that make sense.

[Enlightened-One]

Prove it to who? You? You'd never believe it anyway, or you'll re-spin it into what you think is in your favor. No one on this forum takes you seriously when you go into hyperdrive. You're better when you're calm and make short points that make sense.

Your words translates to “I quit!”

You won’t even try to defend your own stance or provide evidence to undermine mine, because you know you’re wrong!

[Impractical Poster]

For as long as there are multiple promotions and organizations, there will always be problems. Boxing is a drag.

[ewenhay]

For as long as there are multiple topics and threads , there will always be problems. EO is a drag.

Fixed that for you