So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by apollo creed »

We Belove Canelo terms of the leeching:

1. The Franchise Champion will be designated as WBC Emeritus Champion once he retires from boxing.

2. The Franchise Champion will proudly represent the WBC in every single fight as a reigning WBC champion, regardless of any specific conditions or titles being associated with all future fights. WBC rules and regulations will govern under the traditional conditions of boxing in the Franchise champion fights. WBC will approve through the franchise champion promoter every opponent scheduled to fight.

3. Franchise Champion agrees to participate in a minimum of two social responsibility events every year, organized and in conjunction with the WBC.

4. The WBC may recognize a WBC champion in the division or divisions where the Franchise champion currently competes.

5. The WBC may award a Diamond Championship belt in those fights in which the Franchise Champion engages. If the Franchise Champion loses, the winner will receive the Diamond belt and may be considered as mandatory contender of the division.


wbc still wants to milk Canelo but he could dump them if he wants.
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by ewenhay »

I've read no 5 a few times and it still doesn't make any sense to me

No 2 and no 4 are hilarious
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by apollo creed »

ewenhay wrote: 27 Jun 2019, 14:28 I've read no 5 a few times and it still doesn't make any sense to me

No 2 and no 4 are hilarious
As long as Canelo is making big money, wbc wants a share of it. :OhYes:
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by ewenhay »

apollo creed wrote: 27 Jun 2019, 14:46 As long as Canelo is making big money, wbc wants a share of it. :OhYes:
It's a lifetime award. Wbc belt holder forever and can fight whoever he wants at whatever weight without losing the belt even if he loses.
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by apollo creed »

ewenhay wrote: 27 Jun 2019, 15:09 It's a lifetime award. Wbc belt holder forever and can fight whoever he wants at whatever weight without losing the belt even if he loses.
"The Franchise Champion will proudly represent the WBC in every single fight as a reigning WBC champion, regardless of any specific conditions or titles being associated with all future fights. WBC rules and regulations will govern under the traditional conditions of boxing in the Franchise champion fights."

This looks to you as NO fees involved? lol
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by ewenhay »

apollo creed wrote: 27 Jun 2019, 16:15 "The Franchise Champion will proudly represent the WBC in every single fight as a reigning WBC champion, regardless of any specific conditions or titles being associated with all future fights. WBC rules and regulations will govern under the traditional conditions of boxing in the Franchise champion fights."

This looks to you as NO fees involved? lol
Oh he definitely has to pay for the privilege
Perseus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3185
Joined: 26 Jul 2007, 03:58

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by Perseus »

DAZN should do everyone a favor and ban WBC participation in any form from it's events.
As should every other platform that shows boxing.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by SenorPipino »

Perseus wrote: 28 Jun 2019, 09:09 DAZN should do everyone a favor and ban WBC participation in any form from it's events.
As should every other platform that shows boxing.
Ridiculous.

The WBC is probably the most fabled of the sanctioning bodies.

You can do away with all the other organizations for all I care, but the WBC is the body that probably has the highest degree of recognition in the sport.

So many great champions have represented that organization. Legends. It's been the force among sanctioning bodies for over 50 years.

DAZN (and any other network) would be signing its own death warrant if it foolishly banned WBC participation from its telecasts.

I doubt the boxing public would appreciate such misguided spite. They want to see the top fighters. They're not concerned with any petty quarrels over belts, rankings and such.
Heretic
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2046
Joined: 28 Oct 2012, 07:18

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by Heretic »

WBC has done it again... Out of all the shit orgs they are officially the worst.

I hope Canelo dumps the meaningless trinket.

They are making total fornicating mockery of the whole sport :evil:
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by oogiebe »

Does the belt depict Sulaiman puckering up Canelo's butt cheeks?
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101199
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

oogiebe wrote: 29 Jun 2019, 10:17 Does the belt depict Sulaiman puckering up Canelo's butt cheeks?
Doesn’t need to. We already know..

We Blow Canelo
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by oogiebe »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 29 Jun 2019, 11:03 Doesn’t need to. We already know..

We Blow Canelo
:lol:
greg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5311
Joined: 23 Mar 2007, 07:44

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by greg »

..I wonder if being a PED user is a prerequisite for such a great honor? :maybe:
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by oogiebe »

greg wrote: 29 Jun 2019, 11:27 ..I wonder if being a PED user is a prerequisite for such a great honor? :maybe:
Maybe the Franchise is BALCO? :maybe:
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101199
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

greg wrote: 29 Jun 2019, 11:27 ..I wonder if being a PED user is a prerequisite for such a great honor? :maybe:
From when the positive test came out, Sulaiman was literally on his cöck! Backed him all the way. Kinda a way to get Canelo to forgive the WBC.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by SenorPipino »

greg wrote: 29 Jun 2019, 11:27 ..I wonder if being a PED user is a prerequisite for such a great honor? :maybe:
If that's the case Fury would have won the decision over Wilder.
Paci
Middleweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 09:49

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by Paci »

Makes no sense, and the rules are just plain dumb.

Well, then again the WBC is what it is, even worse then the WBA. Wow, just wow.

Im going with the Boxrec and The Ring-rating. I don't care for this belts anymore. Might get the fighters some extra money, but don't care really.
chucktaylor
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 535
Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 18:02

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by chucktaylor »

This is staggeringly lame! Their delusion in thinking anyone will find this cool is amazing to me. They are now the Wackest Boxing Council.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by tiny_acres »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 29 Jun 2019, 11:03 Doesn’t need to. We already know..

We Blow Canelo
:bow: :bow:
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by apollo creed »

What is interesting is neither Canelo or ODLH didn't say nothing official about this situation.
Deleted_Scenes
Middleweight
Posts: 633
Joined: 29 Oct 2013, 17:02

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by Deleted_Scenes »

ewenhay wrote: 27 Jun 2019, 14:28 I've read no 5 a few times and it still doesn't make any sense to me
It's ridiculous. If Canelo loses, he keeps his franchise belt and the winner gets the diamond belt instead, and MAYBE a shot at Charlo (who holds a lower status than Canelo).

So basically, whoever beats Canelo would only be considered 3rd best in the division, according to the WBC. Should the WBA slot Ruiz into their rankings just below Charr too?
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by apollo creed »

Deleted_Scenes wrote: 30 Jun 2019, 08:29 It's ridiculous. If Canelo loses, he keeps his franchise belt and the winner gets the diamond belt instead, and MAYBE a shot at Charlo (who holds a lower status than Canelo).

So basically, whoever beats Canelo would only be considered 3rd best in the division, according to the WBC. Should the WBA slot Ruiz into their rankings just below Charr too?
I think Canelo doesn't even care. He's bigger than those belts. He could fight only under The Ring belt and that's it.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by tiny_acres »

apollo creed wrote: 30 Jun 2019, 08:53 I think Canelo doesn't even care. He's bigger than those belts. He could fight only under The Ring belt and that's it.
If I was Canelo or Oscar that's what I'd do.
No sanctioning fees no bullshit.
Throw the belts away once you are recognized as the true champ of your division
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by SenorPipino »

tiny_acres wrote: 30 Jun 2019, 09:56 If I was Canelo or Oscar that's what I'd do.
No sanctioning fees no bullshit.
Throw the belts away once you are recognized as the true champ of your division
That makes sense to hardcore fans. But casuals are still impressed by seeing an actual belt around a fighter's waist.

Promoters and networks know this. That's why they constantly regurgitate the tale that Fury is the lineal champ. He holds no belt but it makes it more impressive to say that he owns some mythic crown.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: So the 'Franchise' Champion is WBC 's best title

Post by tiny_acres »

SenorPipino wrote: 30 Jun 2019, 10:12 That makes sense to hardcore fans. But casuals are still impressed by seeing an actual belt around a fighter's waist.

Promoters and networks know this. That's why they constantly regurgitate the tale that Fury is the lineal champ. He holds no belt but it makes it more impressive to say that he owns some mythic crown.
Doesn't the ring still hand out belts?
Post Reply