Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
i agree, to me its a 50-50 ish type of match up. they both do certain things better then the other
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
No, Charlo is no Sulecki. He would get inside and hurt Andrade.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Exactly, Sulecki doesn't have lights out power, and Andrade was still not attacking him. BJS has balls, while Andrade doesn't.Nondescript wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 13:06 I'm not gonna defend Andrade against Sulecki as it was a terrible fight to watch.
That said though, I think Sulecki is a better all around fighter than lemieux. He doesn't possess the lights out power that David does, but if you look at his Sulecki's fight with Jacobs, he actually pushed Jacobs more than he did Andrade, and Jacobs is a proven top level fighter.
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Yeah he nailed it pretty damn well.Nondescript wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 13:13 Haha.
Me and Datsue haven't always seen eye to eye over the years, but he's a smart guy and that's a pretty spot on assessment.
-
Nondescript
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 3489
- Joined: 07 Sep 2018, 07:50
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Well I see what you're saying there. I just think that Lemieux is such a terrible boxer though, that quite often his foot work isn't good enough to get him in position to land the huge shots.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 13:47 Exactly, Sulecki doesn't have lights out power, and Andrade was still not attacking him. BJS has balls, while Andrade doesn't.
Plus he has like t-rex arms.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
-
Nondescript
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 3489
- Joined: 07 Sep 2018, 07:50
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Is Korobov really better than Andrade though?!
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
I think Andrade would be a stylistically nightmare for Charlo. Ugly match up style.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
is jack culcay really better then charlo?
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Is vanes martirosyan a bigger puncher than charlo? Talk about an overreaction. Last week sulecki was better than andrade and now charlo couldn't land a punch? I got news for ya, charlo would knock sulecki out cold.
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
yeah same as he was a stylistical nightmare for Sulęcki. Andrade would win by wide decision after a snoozefest. it would look similar to all 3 of his MW bouts.apollo creed wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 13:51 I think Andrade would be a stylistically nightmare for Charlo. Ugly match up style.
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Sulęcki would be competetive against Charlo, just like vs Jacobs. Andrade's style was a nightmare for Maciej, Charlo's style wouldn't though.
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Andrade would be a very difficult opponent for Golovkin while i think that Canelo should defeat him much more easily. styles make fights.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
He definitely is, which is why Andrade ducked him.
-
Nondescript
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 3489
- Joined: 07 Sep 2018, 07:50
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Is Korobov better than BJS do you think?
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
You thought sulecki should be favored over andrade a few days ago. He has nothing to offer charlo either. Lol, pump the sulecki brakes. He's bang average.dagilechia wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 14:40 Sulęcki would be competetive against Charlo, just like vs Jacobs. Andrade's style was a nightmare for Maciej, Charlo's style wouldn't though.
Last edited by Onetimeonly on 01 Jul 2019, 15:06, edited 1 time in total.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Not sure. Korobov is getting old.
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
yeah and i was wrong. I have underestimated Andrade, probably because he fought so mediocre opposition recently. Andrade beats Charlo with ease, Charlo-Sulęcki would be close. Also, I'd favour Andrade over Jacobs.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 14:59 You thought sulecki should be favored over andrade a few days ago. He has nothing to offer charlo either. Lol, pump the sulecki brakes. He's bang average.
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Saunders is a cheater though, he arguably lost to Akavov, he looked very mediocre vs Monroe too, then he suddenly outclassed Lemieux and got caught before Andrade fight. i think that he's not the same without peds.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
charlo would bomb out sulecki
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
maybe, Jacobs didn't though so i wouldn't be so sure.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
As many fighters, Saunders severely lacks motivation when he fights weak opposition. That is why he looked bad in some of his fights.dagilechia wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 15:13 Saunders is a cheater though, he arguably lost to Akavov, he looked very mediocre vs Monroe too, then he suddenly outclassed Lemieux and got caught before Andrade fight. i think that he's not the same without peds.
I think that almost all fighters on top level use some kinds of PEDs. BJS was just careless, because what he used was allowed by Britich boxing authorities.