The reason I ask is because Andrade was more than willing to fight BJS and then obviously Saunders ended up failing a drug test.
Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
-
Nondescript
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 3489
- Joined: 07 Sep 2018, 07:50
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Yeah , Andrade had no problem. BJS screwed it.Nondescript wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 15:40 The reason I ask is because Andrade was more than willing to fight BJS and then obviously Saunders ended up failing a drug test.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
IDK. Maybe Hearn told Andrade that he has to fight BJS if he wants higher purses.Nondescript wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 15:40 The reason I ask is because Andrade was more than willing to fight BJS and then obviously Saunders ended up failing a drug test.
-
SenorPipino
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6055
- Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Andrade outboxes Charlo, who doesn't appear to be anything terribly special.
Charlo has been a pro about 11 years and he still doesn't appear seasoned.
Andrade might put viewers to sleep but he's effective. Talented. Charlo would be lost for 12 rounds.
Charlo has been a pro about 11 years and he still doesn't appear seasoned.
Andrade might put viewers to sleep but he's effective. Talented. Charlo would be lost for 12 rounds.
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Andrade style is strange and fights like he is scared maybe even very scared to be tagged even against the polish guy the other night who aint no power puncher I cannot see him beating GGG or Canelo and id back Jermall Charlo to defeat him.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Andrade will never be fun to watch but I think his style is a nightmare for anyone at Middleweight. He beats Charlo.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
154-pound boxing and 160-pound boxing is actually the same sport. It's not like they were playing baseball at 154 pounds.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Opponents with good footwork would just need to get inside where Andrade is vulnerable. I can't say for sure whether Charlo can do that, but even Vanes could.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
I'd favor Andrade and heavily. I'm not real impressed with either Charlo and really see them looking helpless against a guy like Andrade. Andrade does have a ameaturish style though, but he's really fast and sharp defensively.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
They can fight and we will see
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
We have to see if andrade is as effective against better competition. He's certainly not come close to anything like jermalls demolition of jrock. The most impressive thing about charlo to me is his patience behind his jab. 50/50 to me.