It was you both times.dagilechia wrote: ↑11 Jul 2019, 18:07he responded to my post. and i didn't said what you suggest i/someone did.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑11 Jul 2019, 17:28
In response to a stupid comment. The dumbest comment here was without kds wilder would have definitely lost, duh. Fury fought great, he didn't win. Get over it.
top heavy at the moment
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: top heavy at the moment
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: top heavy at the moment
you can´t read thenOnetimeonly wrote: ↑11 Jul 2019, 20:32It was you both times.dagilechia wrote: ↑11 Jul 2019, 18:07
he responded to my post. and i didn't said what you suggest i/someone did.![]()
i have never made the ''without kds wilder would have definitely lost'' that you are accusing me of.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: top heavy at the moment
I read quite well, son. Now you're whining about what you may or may not have said in a thread you're once again filling up with child tears? Do you even like boxing?dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 04:06you can´t read then
i have never made the ''without kds wilder would have definitely lost'' that you are accusing me of.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: top heavy at the moment
Here you go, pumpkin. Evidently I read much better than you think.dagilechia wrote: ↑10 Jul 2019, 14:11also, nobody believes that Wilder was winning without KD's. one of the official scorecards tells he was. This scorecard is as legit as the draw scorecard in FMJ-Canelo. What does that say about the judging in this fight? Very likely this stupid card changed the result of this fight, 8 or 9 out of 10 other judges would have Fury 114-112 or 115-111 (of course if they were fair).gilgamesh wrote: ↑10 Jul 2019, 12:28
The difference between Wilder/Fury and Canelo/Floyd is this.
Some people DO legitiimately believe Wilder vs Fury is a draw..lots in fact. NOBODY, and I mean NOBODY believes Canelo/Floyd was a draw, and the official judge who ruled Floyd/Canelo a draw instantly became a laughing stock who was ran out of the sport almost immediately after that bout.
The two fights weren't comparable.
Wilder dropped Fury twice, and had his moments in other rounds. Canelo barely landed 1 solid punch all night. Not sure he even did land 1 to be honest. A good one that is.
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: top heavy at the moment
Ok, you can't read then.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 07:46Here you go, pumpkin. Evidently I read much better than you think.dagilechia wrote: ↑10 Jul 2019, 14:11
also, nobody believes that Wilder was winning without KD's. one of the official scorecards tells he was. This scorecard is as legit as the draw scorecard in FMJ-Canelo. What does that say about the judging in this fight? Very likely this stupid card changed the result of this fight, 8 or 9 out of 10 other judges would have Fury 114-112 or 115-111 (of course if they were fair).
.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: top heavy at the moment
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 07:57Ok, you can't read then.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 07:46
Here you go, pumpkin. Evidently I read much better than you think.
.
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: top heavy at the moment
You have missed the point of my post, that's it.
Re: top heavy at the moment
Not sure what the point of all this is, but... without KDs, Wilder would have definitely lost.
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: top heavy at the moment
i agree that Wilder would clearly lost without the kd's, i guess that nobody denies that. but my point was - the 115-111 Wilder card was almost as bad as the 114-114 card in FMJ-Canelo.
Last edited by dagilechia on 12 Jul 2019, 09:42, edited 1 time in total.
Re: top heavy at the moment
Heh heh. I get it. I mostly agree. That card probably gave him 3 to 5 more rounds than he deserved.
Re: top heavy at the moment
You are like a woodpecker without a beak.dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 09:38 i agree that Wilder would clearly lost without the kd's, i guess that nobody denies that. but my point was - the 115-111 Wilder card was almost as bad as the 114-114 card in FMJ-Canelo.
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: top heavy at the moment
okironbeard wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 09:54You are like a woodpecker without a beak.dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 09:38 i agree that Wilder would clearly lost without the kd's, i guess that nobody denies that. but my point was - the 115-111 Wilder card was almost as bad as the 114-114 card in FMJ-Canelo.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: top heavy at the moment
Your post was stupid, in every way.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: top heavy at the moment
Like I said, duh. May as well say without jabs fury definitely would have lost. Comparing this fight to a shutout is retarded. I certainly wouldn't give wilder 7 RDS but with the lack of action throughout and judges different and poorer views it certainly doesn't scream corruption. Thinking one right hand fury evaded landed could tip several if those abysmal RDS.
Re: top heavy at the moment
I had it 115-111 real time. There were a minimum of 8 rounds that could have gone either way. A draw was entirely appropriate.
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: top heavy at the moment
so it must fit well in between your posts
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: top heavy at the moment
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: top heavy at the moment
I think Fury's got the right skillset to dominate ruiz in a fairly boring comfortable win. He knows how to keep the fight at range.JohnReed wrote: ↑10 Jul 2019, 21:55 I think that Andy Ruiz can really fight, and I wouldn't be surprised if he turns out to be the top dog over the long haul. The dude covers up really well, and his time and counterpunching ability are excellent. To top it off, Ruiz can hit pretty hard, and he's got the aggressive tenacity of a bulldog. Let's not overlook his size and durability either.
It seems to me that Wilder has had some trouble with aggressive opponents who successfully carry the fight to him. He's showed flashes of weaknesses fighting off of his backfoot. That makes me think that Ruiz could surprise a lot of people and get the better of Wilder.
As for the AJ rematch, I honestly believe that Ruiz has already gotten him beat. I'd be surprised if AJ successfully comes back from that loss, because it wasn't some fluke punch that stopped him. AJ was hurt and outpunched early, then he was controlled -- practically dominated -- over the next few rounds before being finished off. That tells us that AJ must know what it feels like not to be able to use his boxing ability to keep Ruiz away, or to use his combination punching ability to puncture Andy's guard and turn the tide. So, AJ was beaten mentally and physically, over time too. That kind of loss, I think, breaks a top fighter's ego.
I remember the great welterweight upset from 1976, in which Carlos Palomino outpunched, outboxed, and thoroughly outfought John H. Stracey, a 3-1 favorite, en route to scoring a 12th round TKO in London. Stracey had an automatic rematch clause, but he didn't take it because he couldn't overcome the psychological effects of the thorough loss to Palomino. Maybe I'm wrong, but I sense the that AJ is now in the same situation as Stracey.
Tyson Fury is probably the toughest fight out there for Ruiz, and likely the only guy who can beat him.
Unless Joshua is able to fight quite differently, I think he's mainly got a punchers chance of hitting Ruiz hard enough to keep him down this time.
It's also possible though, that Ruiz fought the fight of his life, and won't produce form like that again.
Re: top heavy at the moment
Nah, this wasn't Buster Douglas performing way over his head. Ruiz fought his fight and kicked AJ's ass. Simple as that. He'll do it again in the rematch so long as he remains focused.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:34I think Fury's got the right skillset to dominate ruiz in a fairly boring comfortable win. He knows how to keep the fight at range.JohnReed wrote: ↑10 Jul 2019, 21:55 I think that Andy Ruiz can really fight, and I wouldn't be surprised if he turns out to be the top dog over the long haul. The dude covers up really well, and his time and counterpunching ability are excellent. To top it off, Ruiz can hit pretty hard, and he's got the aggressive tenacity of a bulldog. Let's not overlook his size and durability either.
It seems to me that Wilder has had some trouble with aggressive opponents who successfully carry the fight to him. He's showed flashes of weaknesses fighting off of his backfoot. That makes me think that Ruiz could surprise a lot of people and get the better of Wilder.
As for the AJ rematch, I honestly believe that Ruiz has already gotten him beat. I'd be surprised if AJ successfully comes back from that loss, because it wasn't some fluke punch that stopped him. AJ was hurt and outpunched early, then he was controlled -- practically dominated -- over the next few rounds before being finished off. That tells us that AJ must know what it feels like not to be able to use his boxing ability to keep Ruiz away, or to use his combination punching ability to puncture Andy's guard and turn the tide. So, AJ was beaten mentally and physically, over time too. That kind of loss, I think, breaks a top fighter's ego.
I remember the great welterweight upset from 1976, in which Carlos Palomino outpunched, outboxed, and thoroughly outfought John H. Stracey, a 3-1 favorite, en route to scoring a 12th round TKO in London. Stracey had an automatic rematch clause, but he didn't take it because he couldn't overcome the psychological effects of the thorough loss to Palomino. Maybe I'm wrong, but I sense the that AJ is now in the same situation as Stracey.
Tyson Fury is probably the toughest fight out there for Ruiz, and likely the only guy who can beat him.
Unless Joshua is able to fight quite differently, I think he's mainly got a punchers chance of hitting Ruiz hard enough to keep him down this time.
It's also possible though, that Ruiz fought the fight of his life, and won't produce form like that again.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: top heavy at the moment
There were many rounds where so few shots were landed, that it was hard to score.
I scored it and I think I had it for Fury by 114-112, in the close rounds, I felt Fury was dictating the fight even though there wasn't much in it in terms of punches landed.
Fury is his own worst enemy though, if you land so few punches per round, you always risk losing rounds you maybe just edged, especially if the judges view your performance as negative.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: top heavy at the moment
Yeah, maybe, I've not watched enough of Ruiz.oogiebe wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:37Nah, this wasn't Buster Douglas performing way over his head. Ruiz fought his fight and kicked AJ's ass. Simple as that. He'll do it again in the rematch so long as he remains focused.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:34
I think Fury's got the right skillset to dominate ruiz in a fairly boring comfortable win. He knows how to keep the fight at range.
Unless Joshua is able to fight quite differently, I think he's mainly got a punchers chance of hitting Ruiz hard enough to keep him down this time.
It's also possible though, that Ruiz fought the fight of his life, and won't produce form like that again.
The focus is the potential stumbling block too, like you say.
Re: top heavy at the moment
Yeah, Ruiz is getting way more attention then ever before. Got paid way more money than ever before too.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:40Yeah, maybe, I've not watched enough of Ruiz.
The focus is the potential stumbling block too, like you say.
Re: top heavy at the moment
100% fair assessment.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:39There were many rounds where so few shots were landed, that it was hard to score.
I scored it and I think I had it for Fury by 114-112, in the close rounds, I felt Fury was dictating the fight even though there wasn't much in it in terms of punches landed.
Fury is his own worst enemy though, if you land so few punches per round, you always risk losing rounds you maybe just edged, especially if the judges view your performance as negative.