Pacman, the living legend, HOF'er, truly a one of a kind! Should he retire as a king?

[caldo2025]

There’s only 2 things left for Manny to get out of his system.

But his #1 rule should be to forget about fighting Crawford or Spence Jr. forget about both of em. He has nothing bc to prove as he already got rid of one of three young lions.

#1 Lure that juicehead Juan Manuel Marquez our of retirement to exact his revenge. Not likely bc JMM, that pussy of pussy fighters took his ball and went home. Go drink your piss Roidboy.

#2. THE REMATCH: This is it! This is all there is to get back inside that ring for. Floyd was there for a reason last night and there has to be some behind the scene factor involved with that Snake of s judge Moretti scoring the fight in Mannys favor. Floyd’s behind it all boys. Mark my words, May 2020 Floyd vs Manny II. It’s the only thing that makes sense

Hoooold on. You're far too big of a pussy to be calling Juan Manuel Marquez a pussy. You have no right to say this.

Who the F likes JMM enough to post something stupid like this? Yes, JMM meets the criteria for pussiness. Manny gives this dope a million tries to finally beat him, like a true sportsman. The steroid junky lands one lucky punch FINALLY and won’t even consider giving Manny the rematch he had been asking for. That’s a pussy in any neighborhood Boy so if you don’t get that then you’re probably one of those trust fund kids who doesn’t know what men are supposed to act like.

[ironbeard]

Troll incarnate.

Manny fought JMM four times for his own benefit. The Planquiao was the perfect conclusion to their drama.

[Enlightened-One]

To be fair, I’m entitled to provide a hostile response to someone that insults me without provocation and also accuses me of lying.

Check IKSRTFO’s recent responses to my posts in this thread.

I understand.

Instead of being Mr Irrefutable all the time , start respecting some of the views of others. Most normal people will reciprocate that respect.

I am respectful at all times, but only retaliate when provoked.

The next time you see me arguing with someone in another thread, check beforehand whether I initiated the exchange of harsh words. You’ll be surprised.

The thing is, certain fighters are considered as being immune from criticism or being portrayed in a less than favourable light.

So whenever someone recites a fact that they can’t challenge, they resort to using insults to undermine the arguer rather than their argument. Insults is their sole debating tactic, whereas my weapon of choice is the truth.

This happens often that it has become bizarrely comical.

Case in point, people became outraged when I said Manny Pacquiao had decade long tax issues with both the US and Philippine governments.

I guarantee you this will happen again the next time I quote an unappealing fact about a fan-favourite boxer.

[lazboy]

Not even 72 hours after his historic win, EO is spreading disparaging comments about Manny Pacquiao

These things which he is reciting are well known to fans, in particular his debt, which has made national news.
The timing of the reciting is extremely poor and deliberate. What a performance by Manny, what a fight, it was a special event for boxing fans. We are celebrating Manny – this is the time to celebrate him.

And then there’s EO. Clearly showing an inferiority complex, among other things. He has a track record of targeting fan favourite boxers such as Golovkin, Kovalev, Crawford and Pac-man. Of course, he should feel inferior to these men. EO is endlessly online and endlessly provoking online arguments, that is the definition of a loser.

Given his track record, mods should remove this person. Again, not even 72 hours after PAC-Mans historic win, EO is provoking disharmony in the forum and disrespecting the legendary fighter. This is not the right time for this nor the place regarding the OP thread, anyone with a level of social intelligence can see that. Let us celebrate Manny in peace, without pages of ‘off the rails’ arguments that see no end.

EO is not able to have a mature discussion when disagreed with – this is irrefutable. He therefore doesn’t belong in a forum where the purpose is to have discussions and the topics are generally controversial and speculative. Ban him .

[oogiebe]

Not even 72 hours after his historic win, EO is spreading disparaging comments about Manny Pacquiao

These things which he is reciting are well known to fans, in particular his debt, which has made national news.
The timing of the reciting is extremely poor and deliberate. What a performance by Manny, what a fight, it was a special event for boxing fans. We are celebrating Manny – this is the time to celebrate him.

And then there’s EO. Clearly showing an inferiority complex, among other things. He has a track record of targeting fan favourite boxers such as Golovkin, Kovalev, Crawford and Pac-man. Of course, he should feel inferior to these men. EO is endlessly online and endlessly provoking online arguments, that is the definition of a loser.

Given his track record, mods should remove this person. Again, not even 72 hours after PAC-Mans historic win, EO is provoking disharmony in the forum and disrespecting the legendary fighter. This is not the right time for this, anyone with a level of social intelligence can see that. Let us celebrate Manny in peace, without pages of ‘off the rails’ arguments that see no end.

EO is not able to have a mature discussion when disagreed with – this is irrefutable. He therefore doesn’t belong in a forum where the purpose is to have discussions and the topics are generally controversial and speculative. Ban him .

He's off the rails.

[lazboy]

Not even 72 hours after his historic win, EO is spreading disparaging comments about Manny Pacquiao

These things which he is reciting are well known to fans, in particular his debt, which has made national news.
The timing of the reciting is extremely poor and deliberate. What a performance by Manny, what a fight, it was a special event for boxing fans. We are celebrating Manny – this is the time to celebrate him.

And then there’s EO. Clearly showing an inferiority complex, among other things. He has a track record of targeting fan favourite boxers such as Golovkin, Kovalev, Crawford and Pac-man. Of course, he should feel inferior to these men. EO is endlessly online and endlessly provoking online arguments, that is the definition of a loser.

Given his track record, mods should remove this person. Again, not even 72 hours after PAC-Mans historic win, EO is provoking disharmony in the forum and disrespecting the legendary fighter. This is not the right time for this, anyone with a level of social intelligence can see that. Let us celebrate Manny in peace, without pages of ‘off the rails’ arguments that see no end.

EO is not able to have a mature discussion when disagreed with – this is irrefutable. He therefore doesn’t belong in a forum where the purpose is to have discussions and the topics are generally controversial and speculative. Ban him .

He's off the rails.

Mate. I just came on to this forum a few minutes ago. I'm still feeling pretty amazed and happy at what a great fight it was. I've never been a big Manny fan to be honest but the fight was special. I come on here and there's already a page of unnecessary arguments because EO has the audacity to critisicise Manny in a thread full of people celebrating him. Of course this was going to start arguments - that's his attention seeking purpose and its pathetic and not ok. Start your own thread - start your own forum website. Stop raining on peoples parade. He needs to go.

[oogiebe]

He's off the rails.

Mate. I just came on to this forum a few minutes ago. I'm still feeling pretty amazed and happy at what a great fight it was. I've never been a big Manny fan to be honest but the fight was special. I come on here and there's already a page of unnecessary arguments because EO has the audacity to critisicise Manny in a thread full of people celebrating him. Of course this was going to start arguments - that's his attention seeking purpose and its pathetic and not ok. Start your own thread - start your own forum website. Stop raining on peoples parade. He needs to go.

You'll get no argument from me. Sometimes I find him hilarious and sometimes infuriating. He's a train wreck that I can't turn away from. He's 100% ass stink.

[Enlightened-One]

Mate. I just came on to this forum a few minutes ago. I'm still feeling pretty amazed and happy at what a great fight it was. I've never been a big Manny fan to be honest but the fight was special. I come on here and there's already a page of unnecessary arguments because EO has the audacity to critisicise Manny in a thread full of people celebrating him. Of course this was going to start arguments - that's his attention seeking purpose and its pathetic and not ok. Start your own thread - start your own forum website. Stop raining on peoples parade. He needs to go.

Seriously!?!

You sincerely believe that someone should receive an immediate and permanent ban from the forum simply because they proposed the notion that Manny Pacquiao is unlikely to retire after beating Keith Thurman, due to his sizeable tax burden?

Is reminding people of Manny’s financial situation deemed as being such an unreasonably disparaging and offensive comment that it’s compelled you to aggressively demand the forum moderators ban me?

You need to toughen up buddy! Real-world facts don’t care about feelings!

[lazboy]

Mate. I just came on to this forum a few minutes ago. I'm still feeling pretty amazed and happy at what a great fight it was. I've never been a big Manny fan to be honest but the fight was special. I come on here and there's already a page of unnecessary arguments because EO has the audacity to critisicise Manny in a thread full of people celebrating him. Of course this was going to start arguments - that's his attention seeking purpose and its pathetic and not ok. Start your own thread - start your own forum website. Stop raining on peoples parade. He needs to go.

Seriously!?!

You sincerely believe that someone should receive an immediate and permanent ban from the forum simply because they proposed the notion that Manny Pacquiao is unlikely to retire after beating Keith Thurman, due to his sizeable tax burden?

Is reminding people of Manny’s financial situation deemed as being such an unreasonably disparaging and offensive comment that it’s compelled you to aggressively demand the forum moderators ban me?

You need to toughen up buddy! Real-world facts don’t care about feelings!

I'm happy with how tough I am and I don't need to prove it in a online virtual world like some....

Also your comprehension is seriously poor or it's just a dishonest attempt to distract whoever may be still reading your dribble. My reasons are outlined in the post immediately following yours on page 4. Perhaps you need to re-read or perhaps my reasoning is just beyond your scope of understanding. Either you are too stupid to understand how provocative your are and how inappropriate your comments are at this time or you are being dishonest. Either way someone like you doesn't belong here. Start your own forum and stop ruining this one. It may generate some interest and may be lucrative for you. I do find that highly unlikely - due to your limited social skills.

[Impractical Poster]

I understand.

Instead of being Mr Irrefutable all the time , start respecting some of the views of others. Most normal people will reciprocate that respect.

I am respectful at all times, but only retaliate when provoked.

The next time you see me arguing with someone in another thread, check beforehand whether I initiated the exchange of harsh words. You’ll be surprised.

The thing is, certain fighters are considered as being immune from criticism or being portrayed in a less than favourable light.

So whenever someone recites a fact that they can’t challenge, they resort to using insults to undermine the arguer rather than their argument. Insults is their sole debating tactic, whereas my weapon of choice is the truth.

This happens often that it has become bizarrely comical.

Case in point, people became outraged when I said Manny Pacquiao had decade long tax issues with both the US and Philippine governments.

I guarantee you this will happen again the next time I quote an unappealing fact about a fan-favourite boxer.

I understand. I think it's the way people perceive your tact when you are displaying your knowledge. You are clearly a smart guy and know your stuff. But, in my opinion, you can come off a bit pompous about the subjects you feel you are more knowledgeable about. I understand also that this is the internet, and a lot of people get snippy easily, especially when their facts are proven to be flawed. In my eyes, are the forum know-it-all. I apologize for the times where I may have poked at you. You have been a consistent contributor to the forum, and I think we should all appreciate that.

All that being said, not every discussion should end in a live or die debate. I'd just let things slide. If you know you'r right and have shown proof, let it go. If these guys don't accept it, that's on them looking silly.

[lazboy]

I am respectful at all times, but only retaliate when provoked.

I understand. I think it's the way people perceive your tact when you are displaying your knowledge. You are clearly a smart guy and know your stuff. But, in my opinion, you can come off a bit pompous about the subjects you feel you are more knowledgeable about. I understand also that this is the internet, and a lot of people get snippy easily, especially when their facts are proven to be flawed. In my eyes, are the forum know-it-all. I apologize for the times where I may have poked at you. You have been a consistent contributor to the forum, and I think we should all appreciate that.

All that being said, not every discussion should end in a live or die debate. I'd just let things slide. If you know you'r right and have shown proof, let it go. If these guys don't accept it, that's on them looking silly.

In a thread celebrating Manny, not 72 hours after his historic performance he is unnecessary reciting generally distasteful things about the man, implying PED use and financial problems. These are distasteful. They also may well be true but forum has already gone over these topics ad nauseam. EO was reciting this prior to the fight - if memory serves me it was a point of discussion around the L Matthyse fight. We have heard it. He's chosen to bring it up again and at this time.

I've quoted him.

I am respectful at all times, but only retaliate when provoked.

Do you not see that he has deliberately posted distasteful comments, that have been repeated numerous times in an attempt to get a response? It was a provocation. Ask him why he felt the need to post this, at this particular time, in this thread when he had already raised it numerous time. And then he claims he is the innocent party. That when a poster has gotten his back up about his post, he is the one who has been provoked and is only retaliating. This is the pattern.

[Enlightened-One]

I am respectful at all times, but only retaliate when provoked.

The next time you see me arguing with someone in another thread, check beforehand whether I initiated the exchange of harsh words. You’ll be surprised.

The thing is, certain fighters are considered as being immune from criticism or being portrayed in a less than favourable light.

So whenever someone recites a fact that they can’t challenge, they resort to using insults to undermine the arguer rather than their argument. Insults is their sole debating tactic, whereas my weapon of choice is the truth.

This happens often that it has become bizarrely comical.

Case in point, people became outraged when I said Manny Pacquiao had decade long tax issues with both the US and Philippine governments.

I guarantee you this will happen again the next time I quote an unappealing fact about a fan-favourite boxer.

I understand. I think it's the way people perceive your tact when you are displaying your knowledge. You are clearly a smart guy and know your stuff. But, in my opinion, you can come off a bit pompous about the subjects you feel you are more knowledgeable about. I understand also that this is the internet, and a lot of people get snippy easily, especially when their facts are proven to be flawed. In my eyes, are the forum know-it-all. I apologize for the times where I may have poked at you. You have been a consistent contributor to the forum, and I think we should all appreciate that.

All that being said, not every discussion should end in a live or die debate. I'd just let things slide. If you know you'r right and have shown proof, let it go. If these guys don't accept it, that's on them looking silly.

I’ll try to take that feedback onboard and attempt to walk away from discussions more often in the future.

In regards to me occasionally being pompous, it’s almost always triggered by someone attacking me beforehand.

Anyway, I’ll try to be less combative in the future, but I can’t guarantee that I’ll always be able to bite my tongue and remain silent.

[lazboy]

I understand. I think it's the way people perceive your tact when you are displaying your knowledge. You are clearly a smart guy and know your stuff. But, in my opinion, you can come off a bit pompous about the subjects you feel you are more knowledgeable about. I understand also that this is the internet, and a lot of people get snippy easily, especially when their facts are proven to be flawed. In my eyes, are the forum know-it-all. I apologize for the times where I may have poked at you. You have been a consistent contributor to the forum, and I think we should all appreciate that.

All that being said, not every discussion should end in a live or die debate. I'd just let things slide. If you know you'r right and have shown proof, let it go. If these guys don't accept it, that's on them looking silly.

I’ll try to take that feedback onboard and attempt to walk away from discussions more often in the future.

In regards to me occasionally being pompous, it’s almost always triggered by someone attacking me beforehand.

Anyway, I’ll try to be less combative in the future, but I can’t guarantee that I’ll always be able to bite my tongue and remain silent.

Always the victim, always someone else's fault. Pathetic!

[Enlightened-One]

I understand. I think it's the way people perceive your tact when you are displaying your knowledge. You are clearly a smart guy and know your stuff. But, in my opinion, you can come off a bit pompous about the subjects you feel you are more knowledgeable about. I understand also that this is the internet, and a lot of people get snippy easily, especially when their facts are proven to be flawed. In my eyes, are the forum know-it-all. I apologize for the times where I may have poked at you. You have been a consistent contributor to the forum, and I think we should all appreciate that.

All that being said, not every discussion should end in a live or die debate. I'd just let things slide. If you know you'r right and have shown proof, let it go. If these guys don't accept it, that's on them looking silly.

In a thread celebrating Manny, not 72 hours after his historic performance he is unnecessary reciting generally distasteful things about the man, implying PED use and financial problems. These are distasteful. They also may well be true but forum has already gone over these topics ad nauseam. EO was reciting this prior to the fight - if memory serves me it was a point of discussion around the L Matthyse fight. We have heard it. He's chosen to bring it up again and at this time.

I've quoted him.

I am respectful at all times, but only retaliate when provoked.

Do you not see that he has deliberately posted distasteful comments, that have been repeated numerous times in an attempt to get a response? It was a provocation. Ask him why he felt the need to post this, at this particular time, in this thread when he had already raised it numerous time. And then he claims he is the innocent party. That when a poster has gotten his back up about his post, he is the one who has been provoked and is only retaliating. This is the pattern.

Rather than make sweeping vague statements, quote every single factually-inaccurate and allegedly derogatory post I submitted in this thread about Manny Pacquiao.

Provide the forum and its moderators proof that my alleged wholly inappropriate conduct warrants a permanent ban from the forum.

It should be an easy thing to do based on the severity of the claims you’ve made about me “always” being offensive.

Some people that posted comments in this thread sincerely believe that I’ve lied about Manny Pacquiao, but you and I both know that I’ve simply stated facts.

[lazboy]

In a thread celebrating Manny, not 72 hours after his historic performance he is unnecessary reciting generally distasteful things about the man, implying PED use and financial problems. These are distasteful. They also may well be true but forum has already gone over these topics ad nauseam. EO was reciting this prior to the fight - if memory serves me it was a point of discussion around the L Matthyse fight. We have heard it. He's chosen to bring it up again and at this time.

I've quoted him.

Do you not see that he has deliberately posted distasteful comments, that have been repeated numerous times in an attempt to get a response? It was a provocation. Ask him why he felt the need to post this, at this particular time, in this thread when he had already raised it numerous time. And then he claims he is the innocent party. That when a poster has gotten his back up about his post, he is the one who has been provoked and is only retaliating. This is the pattern.

Rather than make sweeping vague statements, quote every single factually-inaccurate and allegedly derogatory post I submitted in this thread about Manny Pacquiao.

Provide the forum and its moderators proof that my alleged wholly inappropriate conduct warrants a permanent ban from the forum.

It should be an easy thing to do based on the severity of the claims you’ve made about me “always” being offensive.

Why are you so silly that you're not comprehending things. Implying that Manny is a ped cheat and in debt are distasteful comments and provocative. Look at page 3 of this thread for your comment. I've explained now numerous times that these things may well be true - based on limited new paper articles and based on lack of testing rather than positive drug tests. Why then would it be necessary for me to quote 'every single factually-inaccurate post.' Are you no able to comprehend that distasteful comments about a sport legends finances and implication that they are a drug cheat, true or not, following a historic performance, in a thread celebrating the man, would be provocative? I'm shocked at your stupidity if you are not able to comprehend this.

[oogiebe]

Rather than make sweeping vague statements, quote every single factually-inaccurate and allegedly derogatory post I submitted in this thread about Manny Pacquiao.

Provide the forum and its moderators proof that my alleged wholly inappropriate conduct warrants a permanent ban from the forum.

It should be an easy thing to do based on the severity of the claims you’ve made about me “always” being offensive.

Why are you so silly that you're not comprehending things. Implying that Manny is a ped cheat and in debt are distasteful comments and provocative. Look at page 3 of this thread for your comment. I've explained now numerous times that these things may well be true - based on limited new paper articles and based on lack of testing rather than positive drug tests. Why then would it be necessary for me to quote 'every single factually-inaccurate post.' Are you no able to comprehend that distasteful comments about a sport legends finances and implication that they are a drug cheat, true or not, following a historic performance, in a thread celebrating the man, would be provocative? I'm shocked at your stupidity if you are not able to comprehend this.

You are wasting your time. Fergus has been this way as far back as time itself.

[Enlightened-One]

Rather than make sweeping vague statements, quote every single factually-inaccurate and allegedly derogatory post I submitted in this thread about Manny Pacquiao.

Provide the forum and its moderators proof that my alleged wholly inappropriate conduct warrants a permanent ban from the forum.

It should be an easy thing to do based on the severity of the claims you’ve made about me “always” being offensive.

Why are you so silly that you're not comprehending things. Implying that Manny is a ped cheat and in debt are distasteful comments and provocative. Look at page 3 of this thread for your comment. I've explained now numerous times that these things may well be true - based on limited new paper articles and based on lack of testing rather than positive drug tests. Why then would it be necessary for me to quote 'every single factually-inaccurate post.' Are you no able to comprehend that distasteful comments about a sport legends finances and implication that they are a drug cheat, true or not, following a historic performance, in a thread celebrating the man, would be provocative? I'm shocked at your stupidity if you are not able to comprehend this.

First of all, you didn’t quote my entire post, which contained my explanation for the context of me addressing those that claimed I’d lied, when all I did was quote facts.

Why did you do this? Are you scared to admit that those that criticise me are wrong?

Second, backup your claims by providing proof of my inappropriate conduct!

Rather than make sweeping vague statements, quote every single factually-inaccurate and allegedly derogatory post I submitted in this thread about Manny Pacquiao.

This is the second time I’ve asked you to do this, but you’ve failed to deliver a single shred of evidence.

[lazboy]

Why are you so silly that you're not comprehending things. Implying that Manny is a ped cheat and in debt are distasteful comments and provocative. Look at page 3 of this thread for your comment. I've explained now numerous times that these things may well be true - based on limited new paper articles and based on lack of testing rather than positive drug tests. Why then would it be necessary for me to quote 'every single factually-inaccurate post.' Are you no able to comprehend that distasteful comments about a sport legends finances and implication that they are a drug cheat, true or not, following a historic performance, in a thread celebrating the man, would be provocative? I'm shocked at your stupidity if you are not able to comprehend this.

First of all, you didn’t quote my entire post, which contained my explanation for the context of me addressing those that claimed I’d lied, when all I did was quote facts.

Why did you fo this? Are you scared to admit that those that criticise me are wrong?

Second, backup your claims by providing proof of my inappropriate conduct!

Rather than make sweeping vague statements, quote every single factually-inaccurate and allegedly derogatory post I submitted in this thread about Manny Pacquiao.

This is the second time I’ve asked you to do this, but you’ve failed to deliver a single shred of evidence.

OMG you are an imbecile. Why do I need to [/quote] quote every single factually-inaccurate [/quote]????!!!!

A comment doesn't need to be "factually-inaccurate" to be provocative. Imagine if I was given the opportunity to speak at Mike Tyson induction to the Hall of Fame and I introduced Mike. "This is Mike Tyson, boxer and convicted rapist". LMAO! You don't think that would elicit a negative reaction from people in the audience? It's still "factually accurate".

LOL!!!!!!!!!

I'm done. There's much better things to do with my time. I'm going to end on a quote from Billy Madison as I don't have the Apollo Creed description of you at hand.

Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

P.S I'm sorry I have wasted peoples time who have read this, no more from me, thank you.

[Enlightened-One]

OMG you are an imbecile. Why do I need to quote every single factually-inaccurate quote????!!!!

A comment doesn't need to be "factually-inaccurate" to be provocative. Imagine if I was given the opportunity to speak at Mike Tyson induction to the Hall of Fame and I introduced Mike. "This is Mike Tyson, boxer and convicted rapist". LMAO! You don't think that would elicit a negative reaction from people in the audience? It's still "factually accurate".

LOL!!!!!!!!!

I'm done. There's much better things to do with my time. I'm going to end on a quote from Billy Madison as I don't have the Apollo Creed description of you at hand.

Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

P.S I'm sorry I have wasted peoples time who have read this, no more from me, thank you.

So in other words, those that accused me of lying about Manny Pacquiao are wrong and you’re unable to provide a single shred of evidence to prove my alleged inappropriate conduct.

Thanks for the easy victory buddy, it’s appreciated!

[oogiebe]

OMG you are an imbecile. Why do I need to quote every single factually-inaccurate quote????!!!!

A comment doesn't need to be "factually-inaccurate" to be provocative. Imagine if I was given the opportunity to speak at Mike Tyson induction to the Hall of Fame and I introduced Mike. "This is Mike Tyson, boxer and convicted rapist". LMAO! You don't think that would elicit a negative reaction from people in the audience? It's still "factually accurate".

LOL!!!!!!!!!

I'm done. There's much better things to do with my time. I'm going to end on a quote from Billy Madison as I don't have the Apollo Creed description of you at hand.

Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

P.S I'm sorry I have wasted peoples time who have read this, no more from me, thank you.

So in other words, those that accused me of lying about Manny Pacquiao are wrong and you’re unable to provide a single shred of evidence to prove my alleged inappropriate conduct.

Thanks for the easy victory buddy, it’s appreciated!

You sure spend a lot of time wasting it.

[candyslim]

Why are you so silly that you're not comprehending things. Implying that Manny is a ped cheat and in debt are distasteful comments and provocative. Look at page 3 of this thread for your comment. I've explained now numerous times that these things may well be true - based on limited new paper articles and based on lack of testing rather than positive drug tests. Why then would it be necessary for me to quote 'every single factually-inaccurate post.' Are you no able to comprehend that distasteful comments about a sport legends finances and implication that they are a drug cheat, true or not, following a historic performance, in a thread celebrating the man, would be provocative? I'm shocked at your stupidity if you are not able to comprehend this.

You are wasting your time. Fergus has been this way as far back as time itself.

Stone the crows ! ... just how old is he?

[Evander]

Pacquiao is a truly great fighter no question about it.
I didn't think he would beat Thurman, in fact I thought Thurman would stop him.
Manny has had a great career no ifs ands or buts about it, sounds like he intends to box on and I can only imagine he's going to box one of the two big name Welterweights in Spence and Crawford next.

[Lackeos]

Hoooold on. You're far too big of a pussy to be calling Juan Manuel Marquez a pussy. You have no right to say this.

Who the F likes JMM enough to post something stupid like this? Yes, JMM meets the criteria for pussiness. Manny gives this dope a million tries to finally beat him, like a true sportsman. The steroid junky lands one lucky punch FINALLY and won’t even consider giving Manny the rematch he had been asking for. That’s a pussy in any neighborhood Boy so if you don’t get that then you’re probably one of those trust fund kids who doesn’t know what men are supposed to act like.

A completely cowardly pussy like you has no right to say this about a courageous warrior like Marquez. Here's one thing I get for sure: that you're a total f*cking coward.

[Enlightened-One]

“I find it real ironic how every time Pacquiao’s name is brought up in the media, my name is always attached to it. This man’s entire legacy and career has been built off its association with my name and it’s about time you all stop using my brand for clout chasing and clickbait and let that man’s name hold weight of its own. For years, all you heard was that ” Floyd is afraid of Manny Pacquiao”. But what’s funny is, when we finally fought, I won so easily that everyone had to eat their words! All of the so called boxing experts, critics and jealous American “fan base” either went mute and ran for cover or made every excuse in the world as to why I should give Manny Pacquiao a rematch. My take on all this bullshit is that y’all are just upset that I broke Rocky Marciano’s record and hate the fact that a Black, high school dropout outsmarted you all by beating all odds and retiring undefeated while maintaining all my faculties simply by making smart choices and even smarter investments. Ultimately, I will always have the last laugh.”

“Let’s stick to the facts! Bob Arum is no longer your promoter, so when it comes to @mayweatherpromotions & PBC events I’m the HNIC!
Bottom line, I make more money than you; I beat you, then I signed you! I was only at your fight supervising you, my employee, as any real BOSS would do. You made $10Million for 12 rounds, when I just made $9M in under 3 minutes playing around in an exhibition with a pizza delivery guy! I beat you mentally, physically and financially!
Remember, you fight cause you have to, I fight when I want to!”

[Ezzard]

That's brilliant. Floyd has such a fragile sense of his own masculinity.