WHY THE STEP AWAY FROM USER-FRIENDLY, COMPLETE BOXING RECORDS?

Post Reply
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

WHY THE STEP AWAY FROM USER-FRIENDLY, COMPLETE BOXING RECORDS?

Post by Best Coast »

I am genuinely puzzled as to why BoxRec has taken a step BACK from user-friendly, complete boxing records. Hopefully it is just a temporary oversight/glitch that will be corrected soon. Boxer's records now conspicuously omit the number of rounds for each bout that was previously shown in the past. None of the current records show the number of rounds that ANY of a boxer's fights lasted.

Records used to show W UD 10, L TKO 8, L UD 12, etc. NOW records just show W UD, L TKO, L UD, etc.

This kind of user-unfriendly, semi-complete record is very puzzling for a statistical juggernaut like BoxRec.


Example: KEVIN JOHNSON https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/173416

Anyone know when this massive oversight might be corrected?

Thanks! :TU:
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: WHY THE STEP AWAY FROM USER-FRIENDLY, COMPLETE BOXING RECORDS?

Post by oogiebe »

Best Coast wrote: 24 Jul 2019, 20:44 I am genuinely puzzled as to why BoxRec has taken a step BACK from user-friendly, complete boxing records. Hopefully it is just a temporary oversight/glitch that will be corrected soon. Boxer's records now conspicuously omit the number of rounds for each bout that was previously shown in the past. None of the current records show the number of rounds that ANY of a boxer's fights lasted.

Records used to show W UD 10, L TKO 8, L UD 12, etc. NOW records just show W UD, L TKO, L UD, etc.

This kind of user-unfriendly, semi-complete record is very puzzling for a statistical juggernaut like BoxRec.


Example: KEVIN JOHNSON https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/173416

Anyone know when this massive oversight might be corrected?

Thanks! :TU:
Check if you aren't logged in because it shows what you say is missing. KO 8/12 UD 12/12, etc.
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: WHY THE STEP AWAY FROM USER-FRIENDLY, COMPLETE BOXING RECORDS?

Post by Best Coast »

Thanks amigo!! I was already logged in to make comments but apparently was not logged in to get complete records. That has never happened before so from now on, apparently I'll have to be logged in 2 different places!! :doh:
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: WHY THE STEP AWAY FROM USER-FRIENDLY, COMPLETE BOXING RECORDS?

Post by oogiebe »

Best Coast wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 03:27 Thanks amigo!! I was already logged in to make comments but apparently was not logged in to get complete records. That has never happened before so from now on, apparently I'll have to be logged in 2 different places!! :doh:
I only knew that because I did the same thing! Glad to help! :TU:
Post Reply