Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by candyslim »

FFS Dillian not again !

To get popped once might be regarded as a misfortune. To get popped twice ... words fail me. :doh:

I'd like to believe it's all a big misunderstanding, then again I'd like to believe I'm going to be a healthy centurion complete with all my faculties.
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by ewenhay »

candyslim wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 13:43 FFS Dillian not again !

To get popped once might be regarded as a misfortune. To get popped twice ... words fail me. :doh:

I'd like to believe it's all a big misunderstanding, then again I'd like to believe I'm going to be a healthy centurion complete with all my faculties.
Stupid boy. You'd think after failing a test before and all the recent nonsense with Miller that he would learn a lesson.

Still speculation re the substance though so I'll reserve full judgement until then.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46364
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by gilgamesh »

I don't really care, I just wish that they'd get their sh*t straight with this. It's either against the rules, and people get so severely punished they stop. or it's not and everybody is allowed to do it. Quit straddling the fence, and basically encouraging all the fighters who are close to world level to think it's worth the risk to roll the dice.
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by ewenhay »

gilgamesh wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 13:59 I don't really care, I just wish that they'd get their sh*t straight with this. It's either against the rules, and people get so severely punished they stop. or it's not and everybody is allowed to do it. Quit straddling the fence, and basically encouraging all the fighters who are close to world level to think it's worth the risk to roll the dice.
Agreed. I'd go for zero tolerance. Safer that way
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by candyslim »

@Ewenhay:

Yeah shouldn't go off half-cocked I suppose, but I'm a vociferous Whyte fan and I wouldn't want anyone thinking my absence from this thread meant I was ok with fighters I'm particularly fond of, failing drug tests coz I aint.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101284
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

B0xingScene has now confirmed that the substances were epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone, two metabolites of the banned drug Dianabol.

A metabolite is a byproduct of the body breaking down or metabolizing a drug into a different substance. When a drug is leaving the user's system, it leaves these intermediate end products.

Dianabol is an anabolic steroid that is taken orally (often in tablet form). It was developed in 1955 to treat hypogonadism but is no longer used medically and is no longer legally available in many countries, including the United States. It can still be purchased in the United Kingdom and is often used as a performance enhancing drug (particularly by bodybuilders). Among its many side effects, it can cause serious liver damage.

The amount of epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone found in Whyte's "A" sample was very small. It could have been ingested as part of a supplement rather than the direct ingestion of Dianabol tablets. But the WADA standard for epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone is qualitative, not quantitative. In order words, any amount of epimethandienone or hydroxymethandienone in an athlete's system is a violation of the WADA code.

It's now widely understood that the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association (VADA) under the leadership of Dr. Margaret Goodman offers the most comprehensive, fairly administered PED testing in boxing. The powers that be in the sport should act now in conjunction with VADA to put teeth in PED enforcement.

Matchroom Boxing in concert with Sky Sports and DAZN, Queensberry Promotions in concert with BT Sport, Top Rank in concert with ESPN, Premier Boxing Champions in concert with Showtime and Fox, all promoters and networks, should take the following stand: In order to fight under our promotional banner and on our network, fighters will be required to submit to year-round VADA testing. A small percentage of each TV license fee will be used to fund the program.

Alternatively, promoters, TV executives, and fighters can continue to play Russian roulette with a second bullet labeled "PEDs" inserted the chamber of each gun that is pointed at a fighter's brain.
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by ewenhay »

candyslim wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 14:02 @Ewenhay:

Yeah shouldn't go off half-cocked I suppose, but I'm a vociferous Whyte fan and I wouldn't want anyone thinking my absence from this thread meant I was ok with fighters I'm particularly fond of, failing drug tests coz I aint.
Same here. Last night I was praising him in another thread just before the news was announced!
cormack
Super Featherweight
Posts: 2965
Joined: 30 May 2019, 07:13

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by cormack »

tiny_acres wrote: 24 Jul 2019, 18:33 :lol: :lol: :lol: no fvckin wbc mandatory shot now
:lol: :lol: :lol:
dont really matter as based on whytes performance last week he wud get battered by any of the other top fighters.

its a pity he was knocking AJ for juicing a few months ago tho !
twit
dickbelden
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 767
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:45

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by dickbelden »

DIL WHYTE tested positive for DIANABOL ! https://www.BS.com/dillian-why ... es--141198
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by candyslim »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 14:06 B0xingScene has now confirmed that the substances were epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone, two metabolites of the banned drug Dianabol.

A metabolite is a byproduct of the body breaking down or metabolizing a drug into a different substance. When a drug is leaving the user's system, it leaves these intermediate end products.

Dianabol is an anabolic steroid that is taken orally (often in tablet form). It was developed in 1955 to treat hypogonadism but is no longer used medically and is no longer legally available in many countries, including the United States. It can still be purchased in the United Kingdom and is often used as a performance enhancing drug (particularly by bodybuilders). Among its many side effects, it can cause serious liver damage.

The amount of epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone found in Whyte's "A" sample was very small. It could have been ingested as part of a supplement rather than the direct ingestion of Dianabol tablets. But the WADA standard for epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone is qualitative, not quantitative. In order words, any amount of epimethandienone or hydroxymethandienone in an athlete's system is a violation of the WADA code.

It's now widely understood that the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association (VADA) under the leadership of Dr. Margaret Goodman offers the most comprehensive, fairly administered PED testing in boxing. The powers that be in the sport should act now in conjunction with VADA to put teeth in PED enforcement.

Matchroom Boxing in concert with Sky Sports and DAZN, Queensberry Promotions in concert with BT Sport, Top Rank in concert with ESPN, Premier Boxing Champions in concert with Showtime and Fox, all promoters and networks, should take the following stand: In order to fight under our promotional banner and on our network, fighters will be required to submit to year-round VADA testing. A small percentage of each TV license fee will be used to fund the program.

Alternatively, promoters, TV executives, and fighters can continue to play Russian roulette with a second bullet labeled "PEDs" inserted the chamber of each gun that is pointed at a fighter's brain.
Hypogonadism ? You gotta be kidding, yes of course you're kidding. Mind you if that was a genuine medical condition meaning hugely enlarged balls it might explain a lot about his career choices :lol: :TU:

Now I'm going to go check it it out and discover that's a kosher affliction aren't I ? :oops:
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by candyslim »

I did and it is, but it isn't what I suggested, which I guess would be more likely hypergonadism rather than hypo.
dickbelden
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 767
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:45

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by dickbelden »

candyslim wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 14:28 I did and it is, but it isn't what I suggested, which I guess would be more likely hypergonadism rather than hypo.
hypogonadism= low testosterone production.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by oogiebe »

dickbelden wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 14:38
candyslim wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 14:28 I did and it is, but it isn't what I suggested, which I guess would be more likely hypergonadism rather than hypo.
hypogonadism= low testosterone production.
So it's a testosterone enhancer. Figures. Makes sense.
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by candyslim »

Indeed it does. Bloody worked didn't it? Now Dillian has to transport his bollocks in a wheelbarrow. :lol:

Sorry. Not a laughing matter I know that. Shame on me :shame:
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by oogiebe »

candyslim wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 14:46 Indeed it does. Bloody worked didn't it? Now Dillian has to transport his bollocks in a wheelbarrow. :lol:

Sorry. Not a laughing matter I know that. Shame on me :shame:
LOL! He's gone and thrown it all away.
greg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5317
Joined: 23 Mar 2007, 07:44

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by greg »

candyslim wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 14:46 Indeed it does. Bloody worked didn't it? Now Dillian has to transport his bollocks in a wheelbarrow. :lol:

Sorry. Not a laughing matter I know that. Shame on me :shame:
...that‘s fine with me...the cheats deserve to be laughed at.. :TU:
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by candyslim »

oogiebe wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 14:50
candyslim wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 14:46 Indeed it does. Bloody worked didn't it? Now Dillian has to transport his bollocks in a wheelbarrow. :lol:

Sorry. Not a laughing matter I know that. Shame on me :shame:
LOL! He's gone and thrown it all away.
Yeah, he's probably four years away from a title shot now instead of just the two.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by oogiebe »

candyslim wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 15:05
oogiebe wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 14:50

LOL! He's gone and thrown it all away.
Yeah, he's probably four years away from a title shot now instead of just the two.
:lol: He'll be lucky if it's four.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9440
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by tiny_acres »

oogiebe wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 15:05
candyslim wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 15:05

Yeah, he's probably four years away from a title shot now instead of just the two.
:lol: He'll be lucky if it's four.
Could be as many as 8 years
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by candyslim »

That's right. He doesn't have Stiverne's or Ortiz's connections.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by Onetimeonly »

Jeez, thought slim was progressing mildly, but no. Right back to wilder. :lol:
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by oogiebe »

Onetimeonly wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 15:15 Jeez, thought slim was progressing mildly, but no. Right back to wilder. :lol:
I guess it makes him feel better. THere are scores of similar postings and worse all over youtube. "Wilder spiked his water."
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39240
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by margaret thatcher »

tbf wilders the guy who he was angling to get a shot at, so hes relevant, and then this is like the 4th guy who was gonna challenge dw but then failed for the fight. of course pov and wawrzyk didnt get shots while stive and ort still did
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9440
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by tiny_acres »

candyslim wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 14:02 @Ewenhay:

Yeah shouldn't go off half-cocked I suppose, but I'm a vociferous Whyte fan and I wouldn't want anyone thinking my absence from this thread meant I was ok with fighters I'm particularly fond of, failing drug tests coz I aint.
Glad to see you are fair and honest .
I've been reading too much conspiracy crap from his fans today
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46364
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

Post by gilgamesh »

margaret thatcher wrote: 25 Jul 2019, 15:18 tbf wilders the guy who he was angling to get a shot at, so hes relevant, and then this is like the 4th guy who was gonna challenge dw but then failed for the fight. of course pov and wawrzyk didnt get shots while stive and ort still did
Testing positive is apparently alright as long as you're under the PBC banner I guess.

That being said, I don't give a sh*t really, and Whyte's failure in no way reflects on Wilder to me. Wilder's comments on the matter mean nothing to me either, as he's not the authority on the issue.
Post Reply