Middleweights : Thomas Hearns vs. Michael Nunn

[Woldemar]

Your opinions,please.

[goose 5]

Very nice match ! Nunn gets to Hearns late and stops him. Maybe Hearns would win a decision in a ten round bout.

[paddy chavez]

Nobody out boxes hearns, Leonard couldn't Virgil hill couldn't and Nunn couldn't it could be a chess match or a one round blast out but hearns wins.

[elmersalsa]

Both fighters were 6'1" in height. I lean on The Hitman by decision.

[Noxy]

Great match - Hearns wins it. I lean towards points.

[Nile4000]

If they fought around 1989, Nunn by SD.

[zuru]

I think Hearns wins by decision or ko. Hearns was beaten by SRL,(the 1st time 2nd I thought he won),but most of his other losses were against big strong fighters and Nunn isn't that. Hearns was just as fast and equal in reach i think but much harder puncher and I think Hearns takes Nunns punches but Nun cant take his.

[Noxy]

Hearns beats Nunn. Hearns is an ATG so would be expected to beat an elite operator like ‘Second to’.

[Seamus]

If it's 88 Nunn is a bad matchup for Hearns. He's a fast lanky Southpaw with better reflexes than the Hitman by then. Nunn by KO in 4 or 5 rds.

[elmersalsa]

Hearns' middleweight best years were from 1981-87. He fought at middleweight sometimes when he was a Welterweight and Super Super Welterweight.

I still lean with Hearns to beat Nunn by decision. That if is the Hearns of early 80s.

[Evander]

Hearns inside 11