What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
AJ could use a tune up, get his confidence back and
Fury would school Ruiz
And we're right back where we started before the coke break.
I know this won't happen but still.
Fury would school Ruiz
And we're right back where we started before the coke break.
I know this won't happen but still.
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
If Fury had a ny confidence at ALL, he would be fighting someone with a pulse.
Wilder scrambled his brain in their fight. Why would Fury DUCK a rematch for a fuckong year otherwise? Fighting tomatoe cans? Wtf.
Wilder is fighting someone dangerous, thst deserves a rematch.
Fury is staying safe until he can cash out vs Wilder.
Wilder scrambled his brain in their fight. Why would Fury DUCK a rematch for a fuckong year otherwise? Fighting tomatoe cans? Wtf.
Wilder is fighting someone dangerous, thst deserves a rematch.
Fury is staying safe until he can cash out vs Wilder.
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
TFKoB clearly stated that he wants Fury.Bandog wrote: ↑15 Aug 2019, 23:20 If Fury had a ny confidence at ALL, he would be fighting someone with a pulse.
Wilder scrambled his brain in their fight. Why would Fury DUCK a rematch for a fuckong year otherwise? Fighting tomatoe cans? Wtf.
Wilder is fighting someone dangerous, thst deserves a rematch.
Fury is staying safe until he can cash out vs Wilder.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
The calibre of Tyson Fury's opposition is due to politics.
Top Rank/Queensberry/ESPN/BT have a weak stable of heavyweights and those fighters that are free agents are usually journeymen of borderline fringe contenders.
It's challenging to make fights between Top Rank/Queensberry/ESPN/BT vs. Matchroom/GBP/DAZN/SKY vs. PBC/Showtime/Fox.
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
I disagree. “The caliber of Tyson Fury’s opposition is” NOT “due to politics.” It is the simple risk / reward equation.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑16 Aug 2019, 06:57The calibre of Tyson Fury's opposition is due to politics.
Top Rank/Queensberry/ESPN/BT have a weak stable of heavyweights and those fighters that are free agents are usually journeymen of borderline fringe contenders.
It's challenging to make fights between Top Rank/Queensberry/ESPN/BT vs. Matchroom/GBP/DAZN/SKY vs. PBC/Showtime/Fox.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
He never had a drug ban.
-
polecateddy
- Heavyweight

Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
He had a back dated 2 year ban (or period of ineligibility as UKAD phrased it) from 13 December 2015 for elevated levels of the banned anabolic steroid of choice, Nandrolone. The positive test was from Feb 2015. Hughie Fury was also banned. They blamed eating uncastrated wild boar or some such nonsense.
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
I always found that wording a bit odd, wild Boar live in the wild (as their name suggests), obviously they have not been castrated.polecateddy wrote: ↑16 Aug 2019, 08:38 He had a back dated 2 year ban (or period of ineligibility as UKAD phrased it) from 13 December 2015 for elevated levels of the banned anabolic steroid of choice, Nandrolone. The positive test was from Feb 2015. Hughie Fury was also banned. They blamed eating uncastrated wild boar or some such nonsense.
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
He happily accepted a backdated two year ban. He’s a proven juicer and has admitted it by accepting the ban.
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
I get your point, but what if Fury would fight at least a semi legitimate opponent with some credentials, say like Lucas Brown or someone, and Ruiz and Joshua would stop bickering. Meanwhile Joshua is losing weight like crazy, maybe getting down to almost cruiser weight, like Wilder. Boxing is nuts, but like Mick Foley the wrestler said, the real world is even nuttier and much faker (like the whole Epstein business for instance!).
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
He did take off for two years and did coke and ate everything (I guess on opposite days).
I didn't say anything about a ban.
-
polecateddy
- Heavyweight

Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
Lucas Browne is shot to pieces, and Joshua is going to be nowhere near 200 pounds.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
Yeah, who wouldn't? Point being, it never kept him from fighting. Hell, he won the title when he should have been 'banned'.lillywhite14 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2019, 15:29He happily accepted a backdated two year ban. He’s a proven juicer and has admitted it by accepting the ban.
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
Ilya Muromets wrote: ↑16 Aug 2019, 15:38
I get your point, but what if Fury would fight at least a semi legitimate opponent with some credentials, say like Lucas Brown or someone, and Ruiz and Joshua would stop bickering. Meanwhile Joshua is losing weight like crazy, maybe getting down to almost cruiser weight, like Wilder. Boxing is nuts, but like Mick Foley the wrestler said, the real world is even nuttier and much faker (like the whole Epstein business for instance!).
Even Wallin would knock him out inside 3 rounds. Allen destroyed him and Sokołowski should win by 60-53, 59-54 type of decision. Browne was always overrated, bum beater with no skills + a cheater.
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
dagilechia wrote: ↑17 Aug 2019, 03:22Ilya Muromets wrote: ↑16 Aug 2019, 15:38
I get your point, but what if Fury would fight at least a semi legitimate opponent with some credentials, say like Lucas Brown or someone, and Ruiz and Joshua would stop bickering. Meanwhile Joshua is losing weight like crazy, maybe getting down to almost cruiser weight, like Wilder. Boxing is nuts, but like Mick Foley the wrestler said, the real world is even nuttier and much faker (like the whole Epstein business for instance!).
Even Wallin would knock him out inside 3 rounds. Allen destroyed him and Sokołowski should win by 60-53, 59-54 type of decision. Browne was always overrated, bum beater with no skills + a cheater.
Browne has fought top level opponents, Wallin nothing even near to top level. They forget now that Browne had won his first 25 fights in a row, including beating Toney. He;s only lost twice. Also he's very big. It would be a much more legitimate stay active fight for Fury than Wallin.
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
Then Sokołowski who is 7-15 or so would be even more legitimate as he recently proved to be clearly better than Browne. So i disagree with you, Wallin is terrible but Browne is even worse. Beating ancient Toney years ago doesn't mean a lot.Ilya Muromets wrote: ↑17 Aug 2019, 13:32dagilechia wrote: ↑17 Aug 2019, 03:22
Even Wallin would knock him out inside 3 rounds. Allen destroyed him and Sokołowski should win by 60-53, 59-54 type of decision. Browne was always overrated, bum beater with no skills + a cheater.
Browne has fought top level opponents, Wallin nothing even near to top level. They forget now that Browne had won his first 25 fights in a row, including beating Toney. He;s only lost twice. Also he's very big. It would be a much more legitimate stay active fight for Fury than Wallin.
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
dagilechia wrote: ↑17 Aug 2019, 13:57Then Sokołowski who is 7-15 or so would be even more legitimate as he recently proved to be clearly better than Browne. So i disagree with you, Wallin is terrible but Browne is even worse. Beating ancient Toney years ago doesn't mean a lot.Ilya Muromets wrote: ↑17 Aug 2019, 13:32
Browne has fought top level opponents, Wallin nothing even near to top level. They forget now that Browne had won his first 25 fights in a row, including beating Toney. He;s only lost twice. Also he's very big. It would be a much more legitimate stay active fight for Fury than Wallin.
How so? I didn't see that fight in March but it says that Browne won a narrow points decision in an only six round fight, but was knocked down once. It must surely have been meant to be a nothing tuneup comeback fight for Browne and a shocker that he was knocked down by the much smaller Polish guy with the losing record. Was the Polish guy robbed by the judges, the usual in boxing?
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
Soko was robbed. To me he clearly won that fight.Ilya Muromets wrote: ↑17 Aug 2019, 14:14dagilechia wrote: ↑17 Aug 2019, 13:57
Then Sokołowski who is 7-15 or so would be even more legitimate as he recently proved to be clearly better than Browne. So i disagree with you, Wallin is terrible but Browne is even worse. Beating ancient Toney years ago doesn't mean a lot.
How so? I didn't see that fight in March but it says that Browne won a narrow points decision in an only six round fight, but was knocked down once. It must surely have been meant to be a nothing tuneup comeback fight for Browne and a shocker that he was knocked down by the much smaller Polish guy with the losing record. Was the Polish guy robbed by the judges, the usual in boxing?
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: What if Fury and AJ swapped opponents.
It was at worst 58-55 for Sokołowski. Clear robbery. But the judges couldnt give the decision to him because Browne already had a scheduled fight vs Allen.Ilya Muromets wrote: ↑17 Aug 2019, 14:14dagilechia wrote: ↑17 Aug 2019, 13:57
Then Sokołowski who is 7-15 or so would be even more legitimate as he recently proved to be clearly better than Browne. So i disagree with you, Wallin is terrible but Browne is even worse. Beating ancient Toney years ago doesn't mean a lot.
How so? I didn't see that fight in March but it says that Browne won a narrow points decision in an only six round fight, but was knocked down once. It must surely have been meant to be a nothing tuneup comeback fight for Browne and a shocker that he was knocked down by the much smaller Polish guy with the losing record. Was the Polish guy robbed by the judges, the usual in boxing?