Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by Ilya Muromets »

I figured it was just a matter of time before we got transvestite ring card creatures (is that pronoun OK?) here in the US.
Tony1244
Cruiserweight
Posts: 24624
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by Tony1244 »

gilgamesh wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 11:47
dagilechia wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 11:15

in this world everything is reverse, ''idiotic'' means ''wise'', and ''progressive'' means ''regressive''. all this PC, LGBTQABC+, gender etc BS isn't progressive or modern. a dude in a dress and high heels isn't modern or progressive, for example. feminazis aren't too. they're jus frustrated.

funny when people say '' it's XXI century FFS!!!''. so i prefer to get back the XIX century then.
All you gotta do is not go along with the bullsh*t. For instance you'll never hear me say "He's a member of the LGBTQ community"...I'd just say "He's gay"

I'm gonna talk all day when I could say the same goddamn thing in two words :lol:
I hate the word community when used like the black community or gay community.
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by Ilya Muromets »

dagilechia wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 11:15
Boxing Prospect wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 10:44 A Chinese card a couple of weeks ago had a topless fella... China showing progressiveness!

in this world everything is reverse,
''idiotic'' means ''wise'', and ''progressive'' means ''regressive''. all this PC, LGBTQABC+, gender etc BS isn't progressive or modern. a dude in a dress and high heels isn't modern or progressive, for example. feminazis aren't too. they're jus frustrated.

funny when people say '' it's XXI century FFS!!!''. so i prefer to get back the XIX century then.

Me, I prefer the Pleistocene ice age -but actually the 18th century - the so-called French revolution - that was the beginning of the end.

In the 1970's some places had topless ring girls.

War is peace.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39201
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by margaret thatcher »

Ilya Muromets wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 12:25 I figured it was just a matter of time before we got transvestite ring card creatures (is that pronoun OK?) here in the US.
I know you'll be celebrating that :yay:

Maybe even they'll get tranny interviewers, so that your boy Kuby will have a tranny to kiss instead of Jenny Sushi. OMG I know you'd love that :OhYes:
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by dagilechia »

Ilya Muromets wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 12:54
dagilechia wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 11:15

in this world everything is reverse,
''idiotic'' means ''wise'', and ''progressive'' means ''regressive''. all this PC, LGBTQABC+, gender etc BS isn't progressive or modern. a dude in a dress and high heels isn't modern or progressive, for example. feminazis aren't too. they're jus frustrated.

funny when people say '' it's XXI century FFS!!!''. so i prefer to get back the XIX century then.

Me, I prefer the Pleistocene ice age -but actually the 18th century - the so-called French revolution - that was the beginning of the end.

In the 1970's some places had topless ring girls.

War is peace.
you are right about the French revolution in 18th century - it was the beginning.

the next wave was in 20th century, when the post-WW2 generation grew up (the revolution of 1968)

all this BS is just a wave of a marxist revolution, a communist revolution carried in accordance with the Gramsci's doctrine. all those politically correct morons, LGBTQABC...+ weirdos, ''gender studies doctors'', feminazis etc are the new proletaryat. It's a social engineering, a surgery on a live body of western societies, the goal is to change people's mind, to create the new specimen of the ''homo'', similar to the previously proposed ''homo sovieticus''.
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by Ilya Muromets »

margaret thatcher wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 12:55
Ilya Muromets wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 12:25 I figured it was just a matter of time before we got transvestite ring card creatures (is that pronoun OK?) here in the US.
I know you'll be celebrating that :yay:

Maybe even they'll get tranny interviewers, so that your boy Kuby will have a tranny to kiss instead of Jenny Sushi. OMG I know you'd love that :OhYes:


You are confusing Bulgarians with Americans, a common error since both countries are on the same planet.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16381
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Feminism, helping women by taking away their freedom to choose employment and earn money, all righty then. :TU:
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by Ilya Muromets »

dagilechia wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 13:01
Ilya Muromets wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 12:54


Me, I prefer the Pleistocene ice age -but actually the 18th century - the so-called French revolution - that was the beginning of the end.

In the 1970's some places had topless ring girls.

War is peace.
you are right about the French revolution in 18th century - it was the beginning.

the next wave was in 20th century, when the post-WW2 generation grew up (the revolution of 1968)

all this BS is just a wave of a marxist revolution, a communist revolution carried in accordance with the Gramsci's doctrine. all those politically correct morons, LGBTQABC...+ weirdos, ''gender studies doctors'', feminazis etc are the new proletaryat. It's a social engineering, a surgery on a live body of western societies, the goal is to change people's mind, to create the new specimen of the ''homo'', similar to the previously proposed ''homo sovieticus''.


Even worse! But this is not the place to talk about such things. Just boxing here.

And speaking of that, when does the Povetkin (he looks chubby) and the Lomachenko fights start?
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39201
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by margaret thatcher »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 13:05 Feminism, helping women by taking away their freedom to choose employment and earn money, all righty then. :TU:
Ya, this was really my first thought on it. These ladies are free to chose what they do. Very unlikely that they are being forced into. I'm sure there are lots of women who would love this type of thing anyway --- the fancy makeup, the attention,the money---it could be a fun thing for a lot of them. I imagine a lot of them use the money to help pay for studies and other stuff like that too.
Thomastearns
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2401
Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 11:11

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by Thomastearns »

In these times of engineered social Darwinism the relentlessly sexless liberal nazis seem to have the upper hand. You can bet your life these proposals didn’t come from the boxing fans.

You might say it’s only media driven but that doesn’t make it any less of a pernicious circle of increasing frustration leading to repression leading to frustration and back to further repression.

Of course, nothing is ultimately changed by these censorious crimes against nature, it’s just driven further underground...
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by dagilechia »

taking away the easy and well-paid job for beautiful woman... and who's idea is that? i guess it's a idea of 'girls' like her:

Image

and her:

Image
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by dagilechia »

Ilya Muromets wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 13:06
dagilechia wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 13:01
you are right about the French revolution in 18th century - it was the beginning.

the next wave was in 20th century, when the post-WW2 generation grew up (the revolution of 1968)

all this BS is just a wave of a marxist revolution, a communist revolution carried in accordance with the Gramsci's doctrine. all those politically correct morons, LGBTQABC...+ weirdos, ''gender studies doctors'', feminazis etc are the new proletaryat. It's a social engineering, a surgery on a live body of western societies, the goal is to change people's mind, to create the new specimen of the ''homo'', similar to the previously proposed ''homo sovieticus''.


Even worse! But this is not the place to talk about such things. Just boxing here.

And speaking of that, when does the Povetkin (he looks chubby) and the Lomachenko fights start?
Povetkin vs Hughie starts around 4:30PM-5:00PM, NY time
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by Ilya Muromets »

dagilechia wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 13:13

Povetkin vs Hughie starts around 4:30PM-5:00PM, NY time


Lomachenko fight comes after it I suppose.
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by dagilechia »

Ilya Muromets wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 13:24
dagilechia wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 13:13

Povetkin vs Hughie starts around 4:30PM-5:00PM, NY time


Lomachenko fight comes after it I suppose.
yes you are right :TU:
Tony1244
Cruiserweight
Posts: 24624
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by Tony1244 »

I'm not going to repost the pics of the "women" Dag put up for obvious reasons :OhYes: but I don't dislike them for being ugly or the style they chose, I dislike them for being envious idiots.

Just because they're ugly, it doesn't mean they should take rights away from hot women. That would be like a guy saying I can't box or play football, so I don't want guys who can box or play football to be able to box or play football . Am I right, or am I right? :OhYes:
Last edited by Tony1244 on 31 Aug 2019, 15:01, edited 1 time in total.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46235
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by gilgamesh »

Tony1244 wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 14:30 I'm not going to repost the pics of the "women" Dag put up for obvious reasons :OhYes: but I don't dislike them for being ugly or the style they chose, I dislike them for being envious idiots.

Just because they're ugly, it doesn't mean they should take rights away from hot women. That would be like a guy saying I can't box or play football, so I don't want guys who can box or play football to be able to it. Am I right, or am I right? :OhYes:
I mean when you put it that way I'm not that keen on Athletics come to think of it :lol:

:D
Tony1244
Cruiserweight
Posts: 24624
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by Tony1244 »

gilgamesh wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 14:32
Tony1244 wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 14:30 I'm not going to repost the pics of the "women" Dag put up for obvious reasons :OhYes: but I don't dislike them for being ugly or the style they chose, I dislike them for being envious idiots.

Just because they're ugly, it doesn't mean they should take rights away from hot women. That would be like a guy saying I can't box or play football, so I don't want guys who can box or play football to be able to it. Am I right, or am I right? :OhYes:
I mean when you put it that way I'm not that keen on Athletics come to think of it :lol:

:D
Maybe it's because I'm partying a bit too much for the fights today, but not sure what you mean by that. :maybe:
Tony1244
Cruiserweight
Posts: 24624
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by Tony1244 »

gilgamesh wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 11:47
dagilechia wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 11:15

in this world everything is reverse, ''idiotic'' means ''wise'', and ''progressive'' means ''regressive''. all this PC, LGBTQABC+, gender etc BS isn't progressive or modern. a dude in a dress and high heels isn't modern or progressive, for example. feminazis aren't too. they're jus frustrated.

funny when people say '' it's XXI century FFS!!!''. so i prefer to get back the XIX century then.
All you gotta do is not go along with the bullsh*t. For instance you'll never hear me say "He's a member of the LGBTQ community"...I'd just say "He's gay"

I'm gonna talk all day when I could say the same goddamn thing in two words :lol:
Oh what I meant by "do it," I didn't mean be a ring card person, I meant it would be like a guy saying, "I'm jealous of athletes so I don't want any more athletic events."
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46235
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by gilgamesh »

Tony1244 wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 14:35
gilgamesh wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 14:32

I mean when you put it that way I'm not that keen on Athletics come to think of it :lol:

:D
Maybe it's because I'm partying a bit too much for the fights today, but not sure what you mean by that. :maybe:
It was meant to be a joke at my expense. Like "Hey...I'm not good at sports. F*ck sports!" :lol:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46235
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by gilgamesh »

Tony1244 wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 14:37
gilgamesh wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 11:47

All you gotta do is not go along with the bullsh*t. For instance you'll never hear me say "He's a member of the LGBTQ community"...I'd just say "He's gay"

I'm gonna talk all day when I could say the same goddamn thing in two words :lol:
Oh what I meant by "do it," I didn't mean be a ring card person, I meant it would be like a guy saying, "I'm jealous of athletes so I don't want any more athletic events."
Yeah, my comment here was just on P.C. culture in general, and how I don't take it too seriously nor cave in to it.

To be honest the only place it's even expected of you is like on the internet. When you're just talking to people you can say whatever the f*ck you want a lot of the time.

Which is the way I prefer my internetting to be. I don't act no different online than I'd act in person. Which can be attested to by at least one person...for better or worse I suppose. :lol:
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by dagilechia »

Tony1244 wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 14:30 I'm not going to repost the pics of the "women" Dag put up for obvious reasons :OhYes: but I don't dislike them for being ugly or the style they chose, I dislike them for being envious idiots.

Just because they're ugly, it doesn't mean they should take rights away from hot women. That would be like a guy saying I can't box or play football, so I don't want guys who can box or play football to be able to it. Am I right, or am I right? :OhYes:
at least they shouldn't do that in shorts! 22 men in shorts watched by thousands of women at the stadium...so sexist thing this football isn't it?! Men are not a thing!!!

and boxing? ugh... what a sexist sport is that... those half naked males, they must feel so embarassed and discriminated... what's even worse in this sports? Men can fight topless while women can't!!! what a sexism and discrimination! I think we should liberate the female athletes breasts! If males have such a right then girls should too. Girls power!!!
Tony1244
Cruiserweight
Posts: 24624
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by Tony1244 »

gilgamesh wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 14:40
Tony1244 wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 14:37

Oh what I meant by "do it," I didn't mean be a ring card person, I meant it would be like a guy saying, "I'm jealous of athletes so I don't want any more athletic events."
Yeah, my comment here was just on P.C. culture in general, and how I don't take it too seriously nor cave in to it.

To be honest the only place it's even expected of you is like on the internet. When you're just talking to people you can say whatever the f*ck you want a lot of the time.

Which is the way I prefer my internetting to be. I don't act no different online than I'd act in person. Which can be attested to by at least one person...for better or worse I suppose. :lol:

I can't say that. :lol: I'll diss religion online. I don't do that in "real life."
Tony1244
Cruiserweight
Posts: 24624
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by Tony1244 »

dagilechia wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 14:41
Tony1244 wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 14:30 I'm not going to repost the pics of the "women" Dag put up for obvious reasons :OhYes: but I don't dislike them for being ugly or the style they chose, I dislike them for being envious idiots.

Just because they're ugly, it doesn't mean they should take rights away from hot women. That would be like a guy saying I can't box or play football, so I don't want guys who can box or play football to be able to it. Am I right, or am I right? :OhYes:
at least they shouldn't do that in shorts! 22 men in shorts watched by thousands of women at the stadium...so sexist thing this football isn't it?! Men are not a thing!!!

and boxing? ugh... what a sexist sport is that... those half naked males, they must feel so embarassed and discriminated... what's even worse in this sports? Men can fight topless while women can't!!! what a sexism and discrimination! I think we should liberate the female athletes breasts! If males have such a right then girls should too. Girls power!!!
Sorry, I obviously wrote it very poorly. I'll correct it. Here is the revised version

That would be like a guy saying I can't box or play football,[/b] so I don't want guys who can box or play football to be able to do their sport because I can't do it.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46235
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by gilgamesh »

Tony1244 wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 14:44
gilgamesh wrote: 31 Aug 2019, 14:40

Yeah, my comment here was just on P.C. culture in general, and how I don't take it too seriously nor cave in to it.

To be honest the only place it's even expected of you is like on the internet. When you're just talking to people you can say whatever the f*ck you want a lot of the time.

Which is the way I prefer my internetting to be. I don't act no different online than I'd act in person. Which can be attested to by at least one person...for better or worse I suppose. :lol:

I can't say that. :lol: I'll diss religion online. I don't do that in "real life."
I've been known to do it. Though I do a lot less of it these days. Both online, and in real life. I feel like I've made my feelings well known on the subject, and feel no further need to pursue 98% of the time these days. Every now and again something will come up that stirs it back up again for a moment.
snake33
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 351
Joined: 12 Dec 2004, 07:31

Re: Ring card girls to be replaced with 'fight progress managers'

Post by snake33 »

This is stupid. Change the ring girls clothing, don't fire them.
Ring guys is gay. (Not that there's anything wrong with that.)
but not holding ring cards.
Post Reply