The best fighter without the belt (since 2000) ?

Post Reply
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

The best fighter without the belt (since 2000) ?

Post by ValMar »

I don't mean the secondary belts.

IMHO, Solis had the best potential.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: The best fighter without the belt (since 2000) ?

Post by DrDuke »

Povetkin, if not to count all paper versions of the major belts he had.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39240
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: The best fighter without the belt (since 2000) ?

Post by margaret thatcher »

Lucas Matthyse and Andre Dirrell are up there
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: The best fighter without the belt (since 2000) ?

Post by dagilechia »

Povetkin
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: The best fighter without the belt (since 2000) ?

Post by Enlightened-One »

Dimirty Bivol didn’t technically “WIN” a world title. I appreciate he “HAS A BELT”, but it was given to him.

And I feel Dillian Whyte’s resume in the pro ranks is better than many world heavyweight champs from the last two decades or so.

Martin Murray was pretty unfortunate, as was Matthew Macklin.

Micky Ward and David Tua?

Rocky Juarez?
Perseus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3188
Joined: 26 Jul 2007, 03:58

Re: The best fighter without the belt (since 2000) ?

Post by Perseus »

Eric Harding and Howard Eastman maybe?
Post Reply