The difference being that he fought everyone he could realistically could have done. The only fight could have been made was Calzaghe, but Joe considered Froch beneath him, I'd have expected Joe to win, but it's not really Carl's fault that fight didn't materialise.Roco wrote: ↑07 Sep 2019, 10:31If Froch had been active during the time of Toney, Jones jnr, McCallum etc. he too would have not being considered the best. The best of Froch day was not as good as the best from Benn and Eubanks day.Steveh583 wrote: ↑06 Sep 2019, 18:28
When did froch ever not fancy a fight?
Too big. Too strong. Too long. People forget that Benn and eubank (god bless them) we're basically world-class domestics. At no point could any of them really claim to be the best in Britain, let alone the world. (Both avoided Graham, Watson bested both in reality, Collins in their winter years). Carl mixed it with the best of the best (of his day) and more times than not came out on top. At no stage could they be considered in the best two of their division. Remember guys like Toney, rjj, Nunn, McCallum, I could list a host and other's if I wasn't pissed. they are both my favourites but they are overrated and romanticized because of the rivalry.
Benn and Eubank unfortunately didn't.
I'd have given Eubank a very good chance against Carl, he was a cagey sod, and tough as they come, Benn I think would have been ground down, unless he managed to get Carl early in the fight.,