Warrington turned down Santa Cruz fight in States

Post Reply
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Warrington turned down Santa Cruz fight in States

Post by BigDoofus »

According to his promoter at 1.48



"Chump change" he claimed.
I wonder what he's getting for fighting the world's no.118 on Saturday?
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 6023
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Warrington turned down Santa Cruz fight in States

Post by joshj909 »

"highest available contender"
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Warrington turned down Santa Cruz fight in States

Post by maley1984 »

joshj909 wrote: 10 Oct 2019, 06:43 "highest available contender"


He was or is ranked 4th with the ibf
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13417
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Warrington turned down Santa Cruz fight in States

Post by jameswilson »

maley1984 wrote: 10 Oct 2019, 07:14
joshj909 wrote: 10 Oct 2019, 06:43 "highest available contender"


He was or is ranked 4th with the ibf
And we all know that age old saying.

‘If you rank your boxers according to the IBF ratings you won’t go far wrong!!’
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 6023
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Warrington turned down Santa Cruz fight in States

Post by joshj909 »

maley1984 wrote: 10 Oct 2019, 07:14
joshj909 wrote: 10 Oct 2019, 06:43 "highest available contender"


He was or is ranked 4th with the ibf
Tepora is ranked third and is without a scheduled fight. The statement is still untrue.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Warrington turned down Santa Cruz fight in States

Post by BigDoofus »

I've seen countless interviews with Warrington and his father and they keep saying that Santa Cruz didn't want the fight. I wonder why they never mentioned that they turned the fight down?
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Warrington turned down Santa Cruz fight in States

Post by maley1984 »

joshj909 wrote: 10 Oct 2019, 09:32
maley1984 wrote: 10 Oct 2019, 07:14



He was or is ranked 4th with the ibf
Tepora is ranked third and is without a scheduled fight. The statement is still untrue.


Not when the fight was made he wasnt
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39345
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Warrington turned down Santa Cruz fight in States

Post by margaret thatcher »

That loss to Josh sting?
mark a h
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 117
Joined: 29 Sep 2011, 09:17

Re: Warrington turned down Santa Cruz fight in States

Post by mark a h »

Doofus is always trolling Josh.
The Frenchman was the 2nd highest ranked with the ibf when the fight was made.
He had the no4 spit but two of the three spots above him were vacant.

There's nothing wrong with this fight.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Warrington turned down Santa Cruz fight in States

Post by BigDoofus »

mark a h wrote: 11 Oct 2019, 07:35 There's nothing wrong with this fight.
:doh:
Warrington claimed he was heading for Vegas. Instead he's fighting the world's no.118 in his hometown.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Warrington turned down Santa Cruz fight in States

Post by mullenman »

Warrington card tonight is just bloody awful
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Warrington turned down Santa Cruz fight in States

Post by BigDoofus »

For months we'd been told that Josh wants to fight in America but none of the champions want to know.
First his promoter said that he was offered the Santa Cruz fight and now his father confirms that they were offered the Gary Russell fight : (from 2.33)

Post Reply