If Canelo wins he is p4p #1

[RonnyJ]

langford was good for his time, but far to unathletic and stiff for todays standard. usyk, tyson, ali, holmes, holyfield etc. much more versatile than him.

How have managed to evaluate Sam Langford’s pugilistic talents, when there is either a distinct lack of video material of his bouts, with those snippets that are available are often so fuzzy that it’s difficult to watch the action clearly?

If you’re such an expert on Sam Langord, then it should be very easy for you to answer the following questions?

• How many Sam Langford fights are freely available to watch online?
• When did you first watch Sam Langford?
• What are some of your favourite Sam Langford fights?
• What is Sam Langford’s fighting style?.
• Which opponents did Sam Langford face that impressed you the most?

I love asking questioning to those people who critique fighters that competed a century ago or more.

you possess the talent to make everything more complicated than it is. the videos show enough to evaluate him. he is slow, robotic, simply aint a fluid boxer. his footwork and balance is just poor. he is lightyears away from a prime mike tyson.

he attacked a lot, left himself open, throwing wild hooks, often having no foot balance, cause of his aggressive uncontrolled style. falling on the ground, no balance. overrated boxer, like most of the past. except robinson, he was lightyears ahead of his time.

[boxing_rocks]

when u take the nostalgia glasses off

Yep, they need to do that.