Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
-
bigman1968
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 672
- Joined: 24 Jul 2014, 03:45
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
If AJ thinking about legacy and how he'll be remembered, and not only about money - he need third fight!
Actually he need KO in third fight.
On the other hand, Hearn will do everything to avoid it....
Actually he need KO in third fight.
On the other hand, Hearn will do everything to avoid it....
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39238
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
Nah, no one will care about AJ not getting a 2nd win over him in the longrun, boxing fans are mostly short sighted and will just see that Josh won the last fight widely as he was expected to initially . No Lewis-Rah 3 or Mcall 3 was needed
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
Or maybe Ruiz needs to prove he actually wants to win by training properly and get his far arse in shape.bigman1968 wrote: ↑10 Dec 2019, 07:11 If AJ thinking about legacy and how he'll be remembered, and not only about money - he need third fight!
Actually he need KO in third fight.
On the other hand, Hearn will do everything to avoid it....
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39238
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
He's already beat many opponents better than Ruiz anyway, and now has dominated Ruiz. It means pretty much nothing for legacy
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
No need because Lewis obliterated Rahman in the rematch and McCall lost his mind.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑10 Dec 2019, 14:36 Nah, no one will care about AJ not getting a 2nd win over him in the longrun, boxing fans are mostly short sighted and will just see that Josh won the last fight widely as he was expected to initially . No Lewis-Rah 3 or Mcall 3 was needed
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39238
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
Ya, and AJ 11-1'd bigboi, total easy win and dominance. AJ has bigger fish now and has already beat Andy and several guys better than Andy. Who even wants to see it now anyway, there are better fights and fresh new opponents.
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
Yeah, like Pulev; Charr; Whyte; maybe Usyk. Mouth watering.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑10 Dec 2019, 15:07 Ya, and AJ 11-1'd bigboi, total easy win and dominance. AJ has bigger fish now and has already beat Andy and several guys better than Andy. Who even wants to see it now anyway, there are better fights and fresh new opponents.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39238
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
Better than fatboi being blanked again, I agree 
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
Of course you do.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39238
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
Ya, because I am rationale and reasonable, and actually want the better fights and not fatboi losing every round again, and not the same f@cking matchup for 3 fights straight
But nah, it's not like Whyte-AJ was a cracking fight the first time, and nah no one would be interested in Usyk-AJ. And ya, because Charr is totally going to happen right
But nah, it's not like Whyte-AJ was a cracking fight the first time, and nah no one would be interested in Usyk-AJ. And ya, because Charr is totally going to happen right
Last edited by margaret thatcher on 10 Dec 2019, 15:22, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
By the way. I voted "no." I want AJ to face Wilder/Fury winner and wouldn't mind AJ taking on Luis Ortiz or Usyk. The rest are just win column fodder.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39238
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
Lol so we agree then on 'No', 'of course' we do 
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
Yup. Just rasin' a ruckus. Ruiz would need to prove over the course of several fights that he can actually get into and stay in shape. That's my reason. Not because AJ was able to sidestep Jabba The Hut in the ring for 12 rounds. BTW, those opponents I mentioned were uttered by Eddeh. The great and honest factual communicator.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39238
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
Usyk, Whyte, Pulev I can all see, Charr ain't gonna happen
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
Usyk and Whyte make for a good lead up. Pulev is an obligation that sucks.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑10 Dec 2019, 15:26 Usyk, Whyte, Pulev I can all see, Charr ain't gonna happen
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
Hell no, I'd be shocked if Ruiz ever won another meaningful fight.
-
marvelous marv
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1184
- Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 12:41
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
Fighting Ruiz a third time would only be means to delay more meaningful fights.
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
If Whyte is reinstated as #1 WBC contender, a fight with AJ with the Silver belt on the line makes sense.oogiebe wrote: ↑10 Dec 2019, 15:33Usyk and Whyte make for a good lead up. Pulev is an obligation that sucks.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑10 Dec 2019, 15:26 Usyk, Whyte, Pulev I can all see, Charr ain't gonna happen
What better way to fight Wilder, than become his mandatory. Of course Eddie would have to eventually force legal action on the WBC, then it would go to negations, that would fail, then more legal threats to the WBC to force a purse bid, then that drags on for another 6 months, so late 2021?
Re: Is there a need in Joshua-Ruiz III?
Please no.
He might listen to his trainer a little bit more.
He's more interested in the buffet than boxing.
He might listen to his trainer a little bit more.
He's more interested in the buffet than boxing.