Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack - December 28, 2019

For RBR threads only
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by boxing_rocks »

ValMar wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 11:59 The majority of comments is not realistic. Davis was solid, very solid. He lost one round, maybe two. Did you expected victory by 1 round KO ? Gamboa has passed his prime, LW is not his natural weight division, surely, but during his prime he has been one of the best fighters (below the LWW) I have seen in the last decade.
Teofimo would stop Gamboa early. So would Berchelt. I haven't seen enough Haney fights, but I suspect he would too.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by gilgamesh »

Onetimeonly wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 06:02
gilgamesh wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 05:12

Loma may do plenty of wrong in April. It may be too early for Lopez, but he's certainly a dangerous young guy, and he may well knock him off the throne right now. I look forward to that one.
Me too, though I don't see loma on any throne.
He's certainly on the Lightweight throne.
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7434
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by jujigatame »

Gamboa is well past his prime but he's not quite as finished as Paulie was making it out. He beat Jason Sosa in 2017 and Roman Martinez a few months ago. He's probably better than anyone Haney has fought so far.

That said, Davis had a really poor workrate in the middle rounds and I hope he's not going the Broner route of making little pit stops at each weight class while he slowly eats himself out of contendership. It's funny that all these guys idolize Floyd but none of them have the discipline he had to maintain his weight and become the top guy at every single weight class he fought in.

Is Davis vs. Haney a possibility now, or do TMT guys have a policy of not fighting each other?
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by ValMar »

Cent0089 wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 12:33
ValMar wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 11:59 The majority of comments is not realistic. Davis was solid, very solid. He lost one round, maybe two. Did you expected victory by 1 round KO ? Gamboa has passed his prime, LW is not his natural weight division, surely, but during his prime he has been one of the best fighters (below the LWW) I have seen in the last decade.
Agree. Too bad Gamboa is past his prime. He was beast once upon a time.
Yes, he was.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by ValMar »

gilgamesh wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 12:53
Onetimeonly wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 06:02

Me too, though I don't see loma on any throne.
He's certainly on the Lightweight throne.
:TU:
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by DrDuke »

Gamboa looked relatively good, his major problem remained in his chin. He tried to box, but he wasn't very effective. His wasn't willing to trade punches. Davis had a good lead in this fight. However, I expected Davis to score an actual KO.

Jack started slow in his trademark fashion, but still overall he outboxed Pascal quite clearly. I don't know, how could that Pascal score be made.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by ValMar »

boxing_rocks wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 12:41
ValMar wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 11:59 The majority of comments is not realistic. Davis was solid, very solid. He lost one round, maybe two. Did you expected victory by 1 round KO ? Gamboa has passed his prime, LW is not his natural weight division, surely, but during his prime he has been one of the best fighters (below the LWW) I have seen in the last decade.
Teofimo would stop Gamboa early. So would Berchelt. I haven't seen enough Haney fights, but I suspect he would too.
Could, should, would.................
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by boxing_rocks »

36-37 year old Pascal and Jack looked younger yesterday than Davis.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by ValMar »

I can not understand a lot of posters here. Davis (yesterday) was not excellent, but he was very well, surely.
His opponent was very experienced and skillful. BTW, I feel sorry for Gamboa (Rigondaux, Ortiz, and partly Dorticos, too).
All of these Cubans had a great potential, but their respective resumes and earnings are not so great. Simply, they had been mismanaged. Unfortunately.
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3474
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by Cent0089 »

DrDuke wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 13:06 Gamboa looked relatively good, his major problem remained in his chin. He tried to box, but he wasn't very effective. His wasn't willing to trade punches. Davis had a good lead in this fight. However, I expected Davis to score an actual KO.

Jack started slow in his trademark fashion, but still overall he outboxed Pascal quite clearly. I don't know, how could that Pascal score be made.
His chin is OK IMO. His defense not so much. Overall, his boxing skills has faded at age of 38. Plus, Davis is beast
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by gilgamesh »

boxing_rocks wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 13:14 36-37 year old Pascal and Jack looked younger yesterday than Davis.
Younger, no. More disciplined, yes.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by gilgamesh »

ValMar wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 13:31 I can not understand a lot of posters here. Davis (yesterday) was not excellent, but he was very well, surely.
His opponent was very experienced and skillful. BTW, I feel sorry for Gamboa (Rigondaux, Ortiz, and partly Dorticos, too).
All of these Cubans had a great potential, but their respective resumes and earnings are not so great. Simply, they had been mismanaged. Unfortunately.
The problem for Cuban boxers if they don't have a built in audience in America like other Latin fighters. They're just not as easy to promote. There are a lot of Mexicans and Puerto Ricans exposed to Boxing on U.S. television. Cubans, not as many.

And the Ethnic background, and support system therein seems to play a big part in the chances a fighter gets, and how hard he's promoted.

Not that we don't see plenty of great fighters that aren't from these countries. It's just easier for promoters when they already have a large built in fanbase.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by ValMar »

gilgamesh wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 13:51
ValMar wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 13:31 I can not understand a lot of posters here. Davis (yesterday) was not excellent, but he was very well, surely.
His opponent was very experienced and skillful. BTW, I feel sorry for Gamboa (Rigondaux, Ortiz, and partly Dorticos, too).
All of these Cubans had a great potential, but their respective resumes and earnings are not so great. Simply, they had been mismanaged. Unfortunately.
The problem for Cuban boxers if they don't have a built in audience in America like other Latin fighters. They're just not as easy to promote. There are a lot of Mexicans and Puerto Ricans exposed to Boxing on U.S. television. Cubans, not as many.

And the Ethnic background, and support system therein seems to play a big part in the chances a fighter gets, and how hard he's promoted.

Not that we don't see plenty of great fighters that aren't from these countries. It's just easier for promoters when they already have a large built in fanbase.
I am sure you are right. What do you consider as a worse for boxing, generally speaking, the promoters or the judges/referees ?
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by gilgamesh »

ValMar wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 14:05
gilgamesh wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 13:51

The problem for Cuban boxers if they don't have a built in audience in America like other Latin fighters. They're just not as easy to promote. There are a lot of Mexicans and Puerto Ricans exposed to Boxing on U.S. television. Cubans, not as many.

And the Ethnic background, and support system therein seems to play a big part in the chances a fighter gets, and how hard he's promoted.

Not that we don't see plenty of great fighters that aren't from these countries. It's just easier for promoters when they already have a large built in fanbase.
I am sure you are right. What do you consider as a worse for boxing, generally speaking, the promoters or the judges/referees ?
If there are corrupt judges/referees who do you think paid 'em off?

That being said I've also seen my fair share of what would appear to be simply an incompetent judge or referee as in, it was a small time fight, and I can't imagine anyone would've bothered to put the fix in on it, and the score or officiating is still WAY off the mark anyway.

Corruption and stupidity. Sometimes it's hard to tell which is which, which is why either/or should be handled the same.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39205
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by margaret thatcher »

I'd think Dort has been earning far better than most top CWs traditionally have. After the tournament he should hook up with PBC or something and fight at HW.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by ValMar »

gilgamesh wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 14:06
ValMar wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 14:05

I am sure you are right. What do you consider as a worse for boxing, generally speaking, the promoters or the judges/referees ?
If there are corrupt judges/referees who do you think paid 'em off?

That being said I've also seen my fair share of what would appear to be simply an incompetent judge or referee as in, it was a small time fight, and I can't imagine anyone would've bothered to put the fix in on it, and the score or officiating is still WAY off the mark anyway.

Corruption and stupidity. Sometimes it's hard to tell which is which, which is why either/or should be handled the same.
:TU:
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by ValMar »

margaret thatcher wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 14:07 I'd think Dort has been earning far better than most top CWs traditionally have. After the tournament he should hook up with PBC or something and fight at HW.
I like him, but I doubt he can be successful at HW.

We are off topic, definitely.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by Onetimeonly »

gilgamesh wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 12:53
Onetimeonly wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 06:02

Me too, though I don't see loma on any throne.
He's certainly on the Lightweight throne.
:lol:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by gilgamesh »

Onetimeonly wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 14:19
gilgamesh wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 12:53

He's certainly on the Lightweight throne.
:lol:
You think he's not?
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by ValMar »

Onetimeonly wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 14:19
gilgamesh wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 12:53

He's certainly on the Lightweight throne.
:lol:
:oo
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39205
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by margaret thatcher »

Based on what is he LW king?
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by gilgamesh »

margaret thatcher wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 14:33 Based on what is he LW king?
Beating the Champ that was considered the man to beat in the division.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by Onetimeonly »

gilgamesh wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 14:30
Onetimeonly wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 14:19

:lol:
You think he's not?
Obviously not, that's why I said it. Semantics really, I'd rate him first but no I don't think he's the best and he definitely hasn't faced the best the division has to offer.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by ValMar »

margaret thatcher wrote: 29 Dec 2019, 14:33 Based on what is he LW king?
:oo :confused:
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39205
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Round-by-Round: Davis vs. Gamboa | Pascal vs. Jack- December 28, 2019

Post by margaret thatcher »

Oh, right. I am sincerely and deeply sorry for my treason to King Loma. He has my undying support from this day and will never be questioned again.
Post Reply